TVR Griffith
Car comparison
TVR Griffith 5.0vsBMW Z8 (E52) 4.9
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW Z8 (E52)
4.9
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
TVR Griffith 5.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.5 s
- Fastest top speed271 km/h168 mph
- Lightest1,060 kg2,337 lb
- Best power-to-weight321 hp/t239 kW/t3.1 kg/hp
- Largest trunk310 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score75/100
- Best practicality score34/100
BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9
- Most powerful400 hp298 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Best economy score68/100
Specification comparison
| Model | TVRGriffith5.0 | BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340hp254kW | 400hp298kW |
| Torque | 481Nm355lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,060kg2,337lb | 1,660kg3,660lb |
| Gross weight | 1,280kg2,822lb | 1,900kg4,189lb |
| Top speed | 271 km/h 168 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 48.7s99% target: 268 km/h / 167 mph Calculated | 59.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.5s | 4.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.6s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.3s Calculated | 4.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 14.5L/100 km16.2mpg US19.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 21.1L/100 km11.1mpg US13.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.4s Calculated | 12.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 321hp/t239kW/t145hp/1000 lb Calculated | 241hp/t180kW/t109hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 454Nm/t304lb-ft/ton Calculated | 301Nm/t202lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 503km313mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,997cc305cu in | 4,941cc302cu in |
| Length | 4,050mm159in | 4,400mm173in |
| Width | 1,760mm69in | 1,830mm72in |
| Height | 1,180mm46in | 1,317mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,282mm90in | 2,505mm99in |
| Front track | 1,460mm57in | 1,550mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,470mm58in | 1,570mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 310L | 203L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 57L | 73L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- TVR Griffith 5.0: Power / Torque
- BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| TVRGriffith5.0 | 5,250 rpm | 3,750 rpm | 5,500 rpm |
| BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 | 6,600 rpm | 3,800 rpm | 6,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | TVRGriffith5.0 | BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.3 s | 4.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.5 s | 4.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.6 s | 16.3 s |
| Top speed | 271 km/h 168 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.2 s | 8.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.5 s | 10.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.4 s | 12.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 192 km/h 119 mph | 180 km/h 112 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TVRGriffith5.0 | 340 hp 254 kW |
| BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 | 400 hp 298 kW |
BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9 has 60 hp more than TVR Griffith 5.0.
The biggest power difference is between TVR Griffith 5.0 and BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9: 60 hp (45 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TVRGriffith5.0 | 481 Nm 355 lb-ft |
| BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TVRGriffith5.0 | 1,060 kg 2,337 lb |
| BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TVRGriffith5.0 | 271 km/h 168 mph |
| BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TVRGriffith5.0 | 4.5 s |
| BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 | 4.7 s |
Although BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9 has more power, TVR Griffith 5.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between TVR Griffith 5.0 and BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9: 0.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TVRGriffith5.0 | 321 hp/t 239 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp |
| BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 | 241 hp/t 180 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| TVRGriffith5.0 | 340 hp 254 kW | 4.5 s | 271 km/h 168 mph |
| BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 | 400 hp 298 kW | 4.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TVRGriffith5.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | TVRGriffith5.0 | BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp 254 kW | 400 hp 298 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 481 Nm 355 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.5 s | 4.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 271 km/h 168 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,060 kg 2,337 lb | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 14.5 L/100 km 16.2 mpg US 19.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 503 km 313 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 310 L 10.9 cu ft | 203 L 7.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 321 hp/t 239 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp | 241 hp/t 180 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.5 L/100 km16.2 mpg US19.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 25.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 40.84 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,175 L575 US gal478 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,806 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
TVR Griffith 5.0
- Is 600 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 80 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 107 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9
- Has 60 hp more
- Has 19 Nm more
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























