Car comparison

BMW Z4 (E89) 35ivsWiesmann Roadster MF3 3.2i 24V

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW Z4 (E89)

35i

306 hp2979 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedRoadster2009-2013
VS

Wiesmann Roadster MF3

3.2i 24V

325 hp3246 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedRoadster2005-2014

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.2i 24V

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.9 s
  • Most powerful
    325 hp
    242 kW
  • Lightest
    1,180 kg
    2,601 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    275 hp/t
    205 kW/t
    3.6 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    57/100
  • Best performance score
    69/100

BMW Z4 (E89) 35i

  • Fastest top speed
    265 km/h
    165 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    9.0 L/100 km
    26.1 mpg US
    31.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    611 km
    380 mi
  • Best economy score
    83/100
  • Best practicality score
    32/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWZ4 (E89)35iWiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V
Power
306hp228kW
325hp242kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,600kg3,527lb
1,180kg2,601lb
Gross weight
1,855kg4,090lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
255 km/h
158 mph
To 99% top speed
67.9s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
51.7s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.1s
4.9s
0-200 km/h
17.6s
Calculated
16.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.9s
Calculated
4.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK
11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
12.6L/100 km18.7mpg US22.4mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
13.2s
Calculated
12.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
191hp/t143kW/t87hp/1000 lb
Calculated
275hp/t205kW/t125hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
250Nm/t167lb-ft/ton
Calculated
297Nm/t198lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
611km380mi
Calculated
545km339mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,979cc182cu in
3,246cc198cu in
Length
4,239mm167in
3,860mm152in
Width
1,790mm70in
1,750mm69in
Height
1,291mm51in
1,160mm46in
Wheelbase
2,496mm98in
2,990mm118in
Front track
1,511mm59in
1,450mm57in
Rear track
1,559mm61in
1,520mm60in
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
2
Fuel tank
55L
60L
CO2 emissions
210g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW Z4 (E89) 35iWiesmann Roadster MF3 3.2i 24VPowerTorque
  • BMW Z4 (E89) 35i: Power / Torque
  • Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.2i 24V: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMWZ4 (E89)35i5,800 rpm1,300-5,000 rpm6,050 rpm
WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V7,400 rpm4,900 rpm7,650 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWZ4 (E89)35iWiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.9 s
4.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.1 s
4.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
17.6 s
16.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
255 km/h
158 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.2 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
5.8 s
5.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.7 s
8.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.1 s
10.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.2 s
12.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
176 km/h
109 mph
182 km/h
113 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWZ4 (E89)35i
306 hp
228 kW
WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V
325 hp
242 kW

Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.2i 24V has 19 hp more than BMW Z4 (E89) 35i.

The biggest power difference is between BMW Z4 (E89) 35i and Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.2i 24V: 19 hp (14 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWZ4 (E89)35i
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWZ4 (E89)35i
1,600 kg
3,527 lb
WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V
1,180 kg
2,601 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWZ4 (E89)35i
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V
255 km/h
158 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWZ4 (E89)35i5.1 s
WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V4.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.2i 24V and BMW Z4 (E89) 35i: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWZ4 (E89)35i
9.0 L/100 km
26.1 mpg US
31.4 mpg UK
WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V
11.0 L/100 km
21.4 mpg US
25.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW Z4 (E89) 35i and Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.2i 24V: 2.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWZ4 (E89)35i
191 hp/t
143 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp
WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V
275 hp/t
205 kW/t
3.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWZ4 (E89)35i
611 km
380 mi
WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V
545 km
339 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWZ4 (E89)35i
306 hp
228 kW
5.1 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V
325 hp
242 kW
4.9 s
255 km/h
158 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWZ4 (E89)35i
Power
306 hp
228 kW
0-100 km/h5.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,239 mm
166.9 in
Height
1,291 mm
50.8 in
WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V
Power
325 hp
242 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
255 km/h
158 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
3,860 mm
152.0 in
Height
1,160 mm
45.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMWZ4 (E89)35i
Power
306 hp
228 kW
0-100 km/h5.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
9.0 L/100 km
26.1 mpg US
31.4 mpg UK
WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V
Power
325 hp
242 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
255 km/h
158 mph
11.0 L/100 km
21.4 mpg US
25.7 mpg UK

BMW Z4 (E89) 35i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMWZ4 (E89)35i
9.0 L/100 km
26.1 mpg US
31.4 mpg UK
5.1 s
WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V
11.0 L/100 km
21.4 mpg US
25.7 mpg UK
4.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMWZ4 (E89)35i
191 hp/t
143 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp
9.0 L/100 km
26.1 mpg US
31.4 mpg UK
WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V
275 hp/t
205 kW/t
3.6 kg/hp
11.0 L/100 km
21.4 mpg US
25.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWZ4 (E89)35iWiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V
Power
306 hp
228 kW
325 hp
242 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.1 s
4.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
255 km/h
158 mph
Lightness
1,600 kg
3,527 lb
1,180 kg
2,601 lb
Fuel consumption
9.0 L/100 km
26.1 mpg US
31.4 mpg UK
11.0 L/100 km
21.4 mpg US
25.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,239 mm
166.9 in
Height
1,291 mm
50.8 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
3,860 mm
152.0 in
Height
1,160 mm
45.7 in
Range score
611 km
380 mi
545 km
339 mi
CO2 score
210 g/km
-
Power-to-weight score
191 hp/t
143 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp
275 hp/t
205 kW/t
3.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW Z4 (E89) 35iWiesmann Roadster MF3 3.2i 24V
Consumption9 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK11 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km15.75 LC100 km19.25 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi25.35 LC100 mi30.98 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,350 L357 US gal297 UK gal1,650 L436 US gal363 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,363 LC/year2,888 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW Z4 (E89) 35i

  • Has 50 Nm more
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 66 km (41 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest

Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.2i 24V

  • Has 19 hp more
  • Is 420 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 84 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW Z4 (E89) 35i
Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.2i 24V
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

BMW Z4 (E89) 35i vs Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.2i 24V - car comparison - FastVsFaster