BMW Z4 (E89)
Car comparison
BMW Z4 (E89) 35ivsWiesmann Roadster MF3 3.2i 24V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonWiesmann Roadster MF3
3.2i 24V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.2i 24V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Most powerful325 hp242 kW
- Lightest1,180 kg2,601 lb
- Best power-to-weight275 hp/t205 kW/t3.6 kg/hp
- Best overall score57/100
- Best performance score69/100
BMW Z4 (E89) 35i
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.0 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range611 km380 mi
- Best economy score83/100
- Best practicality score32/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWZ4 (E89)35i | WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 306hp228kW | 325hp242kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,600kg3,527lb | 1,180kg2,601lb |
| Gross weight | 1,855kg4,090lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 255 km/h 158 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 67.9s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 51.7s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.1s | 4.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.6s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.9s Calculated | 4.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.6L/100 km18.7mpg US22.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.2s Calculated | 12.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 191hp/t143kW/t87hp/1000 lb Calculated | 275hp/t205kW/t125hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 250Nm/t167lb-ft/ton Calculated | 297Nm/t198lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 611km380mi Calculated | 545km339mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,979cc182cu in | 3,246cc198cu in |
| Length | 4,239mm167in | 3,860mm152in |
| Width | 1,790mm70in | 1,750mm69in |
| Height | 1,291mm51in | 1,160mm46in |
| Wheelbase | 2,496mm98in | 2,990mm118in |
| Front track | 1,511mm59in | 1,450mm57in |
| Rear track | 1,559mm61in | 1,520mm60in |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 210g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW Z4 (E89) 35i: Power / Torque
- Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.2i 24V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 5,800 rpm | 1,300-5,000 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V | 7,400 rpm | 4,900 rpm | 7,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWZ4 (E89)35i | WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.9 s | 4.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.1 s | 4.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.6 s | 16.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 255 km/h 158 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.7 s | 8.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.1 s | 10.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.2 s | 12.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 176 km/h 109 mph | 182 km/h 113 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 306 hp 228 kW |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V | 325 hp 242 kW |
Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.2i 24V has 19 hp more than BMW Z4 (E89) 35i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW Z4 (E89) 35i and Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.2i 24V: 19 hp (14 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V | 1,180 kg 2,601 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V | 255 km/h 158 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 5.1 s |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V | 4.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.2i 24V and BMW Z4 (E89) 35i: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW Z4 (E89) 35i and Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.2i 24V: 2.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 191 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V | 275 hp/t 205 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 611 km 380 mi |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V | 545 km 339 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 306 hp 228 kW | 5.1 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V | 325 hp 242 kW | 4.9 s | 255 km/h 158 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i |
| 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V |
| 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW Z4 (E89) 35i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | 5.1 s |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 191 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V | 275 hp/t 205 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWZ4 (E89)35i | WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 306 hp 228 kW | 325 hp 242 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.1 s | 4.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 255 km/h 158 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb | 1,180 kg 2,601 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 611 km 380 mi | 545 km 339 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 210 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 191 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 275 hp/t 205 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW Z4 (E89) 35i | Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.2i 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK | 11 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.75 LC100 km | 19.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.35 LC100 mi | 30.98 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,350 L357 US gal297 UK gal | 1,650 L436 US gal363 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,363 LC/year | 2,888 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW Z4 (E89) 35i
- Has 50 Nm more
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 66 km (41 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.2i 24V
- Has 19 hp more
- Is 420 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 84 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























