BMW Z4 (E89)
Car comparison
BMW Z4 (E89) 30ivsNissan 350Z Roadster (Z33) · Facelift 2007 3.5i V6 24V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonNissan 350Z Roadster (Z33) · Facelift 2007
3.5i V6 24V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Nissan 350Z Roadster (Z33) Facelift 2007 3.5i V6 24V
- Most powerful300 hp224 kW
- Highest torque361 Nm266 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight183 hp/t137 kW/t5.5 kg/hp
- Largest trunk235 L
- Best overall score52/100
- Best performance score62/100
- Best practicality score30/100
BMW Z4 (E89) 30i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.8 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,490 kg3,285 lb
- Best economy score84/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWZ4 (E89)30i | Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)Facelift 20073.5i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 258hp192kW | 300hp224kW |
| Torque | 315Nm232lb-ft | 361Nm266lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,490kg3,285lb | 1,635kg3,605lb |
| Gross weight | 1,745kg3,847lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 76.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 85.7s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.8s | 6.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.5s Calculated | 22.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.5s Calculated | 6.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.9s Calculated | 14.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 173hp/t129kW/t79hp/1000 lb Calculated | 183hp/t137kW/t83hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 211Nm/t141lb-ft/ton Calculated | 221Nm/t148lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 647km402mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,996cc183cu in | 3,498cc213cu in |
| Length | 4,239mm167in | 4,315mm170in |
| Width | 1,790mm70in | 1,815mm71in |
| Height | 1,291mm51in | 1,330mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,496mm98in | 2,650mm104in |
| Front track | 1,511mm59in | 1,535mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,537mm61in | 1,540mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 125mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 180L | 235L |
| Max trunk volume | 310L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 80L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW Z4 (E89) 30i: Power / Torque
- Nissan 350Z Roadster (Z33) Facelift 2007 3.5i V6 24V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i | 6,600 rpm | 2,500 rpm | 6,850 rpm |
| Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)Facelift 20073.5i V6 24V | 6,400 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWZ4 (E89)30i | Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)Facelift 20073.5i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.5 s | 6.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.8 s | 6.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.5 s | 22.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.7 s | 12.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.9 s | 14.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 168 km/h 105 mph | 163 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i | 258 hp 192 kW |
| Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)Facelift 20073.5i V6 24V | 300 hp 224 kW |
Nissan 350Z Roadster (Z33) Facelift 2007 3.5i V6 24V has 42 hp more than BMW Z4 (E89) 30i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW Z4 (E89) 30i and Nissan 350Z Roadster (Z33) Facelift 2007 3.5i V6 24V: 42 hp (31 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i | 315 Nm 232 lb-ft |
| Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)Facelift 20073.5i V6 24V | 361 Nm 266 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb |
| Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)Facelift 20073.5i V6 24V | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)Facelift 20073.5i V6 24V | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i | 5.8 s |
| Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)Facelift 20073.5i V6 24V | 6.4 s |
Although Nissan 350Z Roadster (Z33) Facelift 2007 3.5i V6 24V has more power, BMW Z4 (E89) 30i is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW Z4 (E89) 30i and Nissan 350Z Roadster (Z33) Facelift 2007 3.5i V6 24V: 0.6 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i | 173 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
| Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)Facelift 20073.5i V6 24V | 183 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i | 258 hp 192 kW | 5.8 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)Facelift 20073.5i V6 24V | 300 hp 224 kW | 6.4 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)Facelift 20073.5i V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWZ4 (E89)30i | Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)Facelift 20073.5i V6 24V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 258 hp 192 kW | 300 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 315 Nm 232 lb-ft | 361 Nm 266 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.8 s | 6.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 647 km 402 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 180 L 6.4 cu ft | 235 L 8.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 173 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 183 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW Z4 (E89) 30i |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.88 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.94 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,231 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW Z4 (E89) 30i
- Is 145 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Nissan 350Z Roadster (Z33) Facelift 2007 3.5i V6 24V
- Has 42 hp more
- Has 46 Nm more
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 55 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























