Porsche Boxster (987) · Facelift 2009
Car comparison
Porsche Boxster (987) · Facelift 2009 2.9vsBMW Z4 (E89) 30i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW Z4 (E89)
30i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW Z4 (E89) 30i
- Most powerful258 hp192 kW
- Highest torque315 Nm232 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.4 L/100 km19.0 mpg US22.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Largest trunk180 L
- Best economy score84/100
- Best practicality score28/100
Porsche Boxster (987) Facelift 2009 2.9
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.8 s
- Fastest top speed261 km/h162 mph
- Lightest1,365 kg3,009 lb
- Best power-to-weight187 hp/t139 kW/t5.4 kg/hp
- Best estimated range714 km444 mi
- Best overall score50/100
- Best performance score62/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9 | BMWZ4 (E89)30i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 255hp190kW | 258hp192kW |
| Torque | 290Nm214lb-ft | 315Nm232lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,365kg3,009lb | 1,490kg3,285lb |
| Gross weight | 1,670kg3,682lb | 1,745kg3,847lb |
| Top speed | 261 km/h 162 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 89.6s99% target: 258 km/h / 161 mph Calculated | 76.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.8s | 5.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.1s | 20.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.5s Calculated | 5.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.6L/100 km17.3mpg US20.8mpg UK | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.9s Calculated | 13.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 187hp/t139kW/t85hp/1000 lb Calculated | 173hp/t129kW/t79hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 212Nm/t142lb-ft/ton Calculated | 211Nm/t141lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 714km444mi Calculated | 647km402mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,893cc177cu in | 2,996cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,342mm171in | 4,239mm167in |
| Width | 1,801mm71in | 1,790mm70in |
| Height | 1,292mm51in | 1,291mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,415mm95in | 2,496mm98in |
| Front track | 1,490mm59in | 1,511mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,534mm60in | 1,537mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 127mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 130L | 180L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 310L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 214g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Boxster (987) Facelift 2009 2.9: Power / Torque
- BMW Z4 (E89) 30i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9 | 7,200 rpm | 4,400-6,000 rpm | 7,500 rpm |
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i | 6,600 rpm | 2,500 rpm | 6,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9 | BMWZ4 (E89)30i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.5 s | 5.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.8 s | 5.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.1 s | 20.5 s |
| Top speed | 261 km/h 162 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.7 s | 11.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.9 s | 13.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 165 km/h 102 mph | 168 km/h 105 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9 | 255 hp 190 kW |
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i | 258 hp 192 kW |
BMW Z4 (E89) 30i has 3 hp more than Porsche Boxster (987) Facelift 2009 2.9.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche Boxster (987) Facelift 2009 2.9 and BMW Z4 (E89) 30i: 3 hp (2 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9 | 290 Nm 214 lb-ft |
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i | 315 Nm 232 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9 | 1,365 kg 3,009 lb |
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9 | 261 km/h 162 mph |
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9 | 5.8 s |
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i | 5.8 s |
Although BMW Z4 (E89) 30i has more power, Porsche Boxster (987) Facelift 2009 2.9 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9 | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW Z4 (E89) 30i and Porsche Boxster (987) Facelift 2009 2.9: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9 | 187 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp |
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i | 173 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9 | 714 km 444 mi |
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i | 647 km 402 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9 | 255 hp 190 kW | 5.8 s | 261 km/h 162 mph |
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i | 258 hp 192 kW | 5.8 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9 |
| 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i |
| 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche Boxster (987) Facelift 2009 2.9 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9 | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9 | 187 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i | 173 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9 | BMWZ4 (E89)30i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 255 hp 190 kW | 258 hp 192 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 290 Nm 214 lb-ft | 315 Nm 232 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.8 s | 5.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 261 km/h 162 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,365 kg 3,009 lb | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 714 km 444 mi | 647 km 402 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 214 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 130 L 4.6 cu ft | 180 L 6.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 187 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 173 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Boxster (987) Facelift 2009 2.9 | BMW Z4 (E89) 30i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK | 8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.92 LC100 km | 14.88 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.63 LC100 mi | 23.94 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal | 1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,389 LC/year | 2,231 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Boxster (987) Facelift 2009 2.9
- Is 125 kg lighter
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 67 km (42 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
BMW Z4 (E89) 30i
- Has 3 hp more
- Has 25 Nm more
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 50 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























