AUDI TTS Roadster (8J)
Car comparison
AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSIvsBMW Z4 (E89) 30i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW Z4 (E89)
30i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.7 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful272 hp203 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest1,475 kg3,252 lb
- Best power-to-weight184 hp/t138 kW/t5.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34.0 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range723 km449 mi
- Largest trunk250 L
- Best overall score52/100
- Best performance score63/100
- Best economy score85/100
- Best practicality score30/100
BMW Z4 (E89) 30i
- Lowest highway consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | BMWZ4 (E89)30i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 272hp203kW | 258hp192kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 315Nm232lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,475kg3,252lb | 1,490kg3,285lb |
| Gross weight | 1,795kg3,957lb | 1,745kg3,847lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 76.1s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 76.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.7s | 5.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.4s Calculated | 20.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.4s Calculated | 5.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.8s Calculated | 13.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 184hp/t138kW/t84hp/1000 lb Calculated | 173hp/t129kW/t79hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 237Nm/t159lb-ft/ton Calculated | 211Nm/t141lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 723km449mi Calculated | 647km402mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 2,996cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,198mm165in | 4,239mm167in |
| Width | 1,842mm73in | 1,790mm70in |
| Height | 1,350mm53in | 1,291mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,468mm97in | 2,496mm98in |
| Front track | 1,555mm61in | 1,511mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,546mm61in | 1,537mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 250L | 180L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 310L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 189g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- BMW Z4 (E89) 30i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 6,000 rpm | 2,500-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i | 6,600 rpm | 2,500 rpm | 6,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | BMWZ4 (E89)30i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.4 s | 5.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.7 s | 5.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.4 s | 20.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.6 s | 11.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.8 s | 13.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 169 km/h 105 mph | 168 km/h 105 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 272 hp 203 kW |
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i | 258 hp 192 kW |
AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI has 14 hp more than BMW Z4 (E89) 30i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW Z4 (E89) 30i and AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i | 315 Nm 232 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 1,475 kg 3,252 lb |
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 5.7 s |
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i | 5.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI and BMW Z4 (E89) 30i: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 184 hp/t 138 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp |
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i | 173 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 723 km 449 mi |
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i | 647 km 402 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 272 hp 203 kW | 5.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i | 258 hp 192 kW | 5.8 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI |
| 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i |
| 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 184 hp/t 138 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i | 173 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | BMWZ4 (E89)30i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 272 hp 203 kW | 258 hp 192 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 315 Nm 232 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.7 s | 5.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,475 kg 3,252 lb | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 723 km 449 mi | 647 km 402 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 189 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 250 L 8.8 cu ft | 180 L 6.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 184 hp/t 138 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 173 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI | BMW Z4 (E89) 30i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK | 8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.53 LC100 km | 14.88 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.38 LC100 mi | 23.94 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal | 1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,179 LC/year | 2,231 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI
- Has 14 hp more
- Has 35 Nm more
- Is 15 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 76 km (47 mi) more estimated range
- Has 70 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
BMW Z4 (E89) 30i
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























