BMW Z4 (E89)
Car comparison
BMW Z4 (E89) 30ivsAUDI TTS Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI TTS Roadster (8J)
2.0 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.5 s
- Most powerful272 hp203 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight182 hp/t136 kW/t5.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range759 km472 mi
- Largest trunk250 L
- Best overall score52/100
- Best performance score62/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score30/100
BMW Z4 (E89) 30i
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,490 kg3,285 lb
- Lowest highway consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWZ4 (E89)30i | AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 258hp192kW | 272hp203kW |
| Torque | 315Nm232lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,490kg3,285lb | 1,495kg3,296lb |
| Gross weight | 1,745kg3,847lb | 1,815kg4,001lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 76.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 69.6s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.8s | 5.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.5s Calculated | 20.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.5s Calculated | 5.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.9s Calculated | 13.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 173hp/t129kW/t79hp/1000 lb Calculated | 182hp/t136kW/t83hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 211Nm/t141lb-ft/ton Calculated | 234Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 647km402mi Calculated | 759km472mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,996cc183cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,239mm167in | 4,198mm165in |
| Width | 1,790mm70in | 1,842mm73in |
| Height | 1,291mm51in | 1,350mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,496mm98in | 2,468mm97in |
| Front track | 1,511mm59in | 1,555mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,537mm61in | 1,546mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 180L | 250L |
| Max trunk volume | 310L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 184g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW Z4 (E89) 30i: Power / Torque
- AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i | 6,600 rpm | 2,500 rpm | 6,850 rpm |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 6,000 rpm | 2,500-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWZ4 (E89)30i | AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.5 s | 5.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.8 s | 5.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.5 s | 20.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 8.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.7 s | 11.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.9 s | 13.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 168 km/h 105 mph | 169 km/h 105 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i | 258 hp 192 kW |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 272 hp 203 kW |
AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI has 14 hp more than BMW Z4 (E89) 30i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW Z4 (E89) 30i and AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i | 315 Nm 232 lb-ft |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 250 km/h 155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i | 5.8 s |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 5.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI and BMW Z4 (E89) 30i: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI and BMW Z4 (E89) 30i: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i | 173 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i | 647 km 402 mi |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 759 km 472 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i | 258 hp 192 kW | 5.8 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 272 hp 203 kW | 5.5 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i |
| 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i | 173 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWZ4 (E89)30i | AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 258 hp 192 kW | 272 hp 203 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 315 Nm 232 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.8 s | 5.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 647 km 402 mi | 759 km 472 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 184 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 180 L 6.4 cu ft | 250 L 8.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 173 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW Z4 (E89) 30i | AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.88 LC100 km | 13.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.94 LC100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,231 LC/year | 2,074 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW Z4 (E89) 30i
- Is 5 kg lighter
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI
- Has 14 hp more
- Has 35 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 112 km (70 mi) more estimated range
- Has 70 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























