BMW Z4 (E85)
Car comparison
BMW Z4 (E85) 2.5ivsMini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Roadster (R59)
Cooper S 1.6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6
- Highest torque260 Nm192 lb-ft
- Lightest1,185 kg2,612 lb
- Best power-to-weight155 hp/t116 kW/t6.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range833 km518 mi
- Best economy score91/100
BMW Z4 (E85) 2.5i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.0 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Most powerful192 hp143 kW
- Largest trunk240 L
- Best overall score45/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best practicality score30/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 192hp143kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 245Nm181lb-ft | 260Nm192lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,335kg2,943lb | 1,185kg2,612lb |
| Gross weight | 1,560kg3,439lb | 1,475kg3,252lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.5s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 74.9s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.0s | 7.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.1s Calculated | 31.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.0s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 144hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated | 155hp/t116kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 184Nm/t123lb-ft/ton Calculated | 219Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 743km462mi Calculated | 833km518mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,494cc152cu in | 1,598cc98cu in |
| Length | 4,091mm161in | 3,734mm147in |
| Width | 1,781mm70in | 1,683mm66in |
| Height | 1,299mm51in | 1,390mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,495mm98in | 2,467mm97in |
| Front track | 1,473mm58in | 1,453mm57in |
| Rear track | 1,523mm60in | 1,461mm58in |
| Ground clearance | - | 134mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 240L | 240L |
| Max trunk volume | 260L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 139g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW Z4 (E85) 2.5i: Power / Torque
- Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | 6,000 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 5,500 rpm | 1,730-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.0 s | 7.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.1 s | 31.0 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.0 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 96 mph | 154 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | 192 hp 143 kW |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 184 hp 137 kW |
BMW Z4 (E85) 2.5i has 8 hp more than Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6.
The biggest power difference is between Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6 and BMW Z4 (E85) 2.5i: 8 hp (6 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | 245 Nm 181 lb-ft |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | 1,335 kg 2,943 lb |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 1,185 kg 2,612 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 227 km/h 141 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | 7.0 s |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 7.0 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6 and BMW Z4 (E85) 2.5i: 1.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | 743 km 462 mi |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 833 km 518 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | 192 hp 143 kW | 7.0 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.0 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i |
| 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW Z4 (E85) 2.5i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 192 hp 143 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 245 Nm 181 lb-ft | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.0 s | 7.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,335 kg 2,943 lb | 1,185 kg 2,612 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 743 km 462 mi | 833 km 518 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 139 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 240 L 8.5 cu ft | 240 L 8.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW Z4 (E85) 2.5i | Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.95 LC100 km | 10.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.84 LC100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,943 LC/year | 1,575 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW Z4 (E85) 2.5i
- Has 8 hp more
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6
- Has 15 Nm more
- Is 150 kg lighter
- Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 90 km (56 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























