BMW Z4 Coupe (E86)
Car comparison
BMW Z4 Coupe (E86) M 3.2vsNissan 350Z (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonNissan 350Z (Z33)
3.5 i V6 24V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW Z4 Coupe (E86) M 3.2
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.0 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful343 hp256 kW
- Highest torque365 Nm269 lb-ft
- Lightest1,425 kg3,142 lb
- Best power-to-weight241 hp/t179 kW/t4.2 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK
- Largest trunk245 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score69/100
- Best economy score74/100
- Best practicality score35/100
Nissan 350Z (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V
- Lowest city consumption16.1 L/100 km14.6 mpg US17.5 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 343hp256kW | 313hp233kW |
| Torque | 365Nm269lb-ft | 352Nm260lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,425kg3,142lb | 1,545kg3,406lb |
| Gross weight | 1,730kg3,814lb | 1,820kg4,012lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 62.5s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 78.9s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.0s | 5.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.7s Calculated | 20.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.8s Calculated | 5.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.1L/100 km19.4mpg US23.3mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 18.2L/100 km12.9mpg US15.5mpg UK | 16.1L/100 km14.6mpg US17.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.1s Calculated | 13.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 241hp/t179kW/t109hp/1000 lb Calculated | 203hp/t151kW/t92hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 256Nm/t171lb-ft/ton Calculated | 228Nm/t152lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 455km282mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 3,246cc198cu in | 3,498cc213cu in |
| Length | 4,113mm162in | 4,310mm170in |
| Width | 1,781mm70in | 1,816mm71in |
| Height | 1,271mm50in | 1,316mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,497mm98in | 2,650mm104in |
| Front track | 1,486mm59in | 1,534mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,516mm60in | 1,544mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 245L | 235L |
| Max trunk volume | 300L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 80L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW Z4 Coupe (E86) M 3.2: Power / Torque
- Nissan 350Z (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | 7,900 rpm | 4,900 rpm | 8,150 rpm |
| Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 6,400 rpm | 4,800 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.8 s | 5.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.0 s | 5.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.7 s | 20.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.6 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.0 s | 11.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.1 s | 13.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 179 km/h 111 mph | 169 km/h 105 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | 343 hp 256 kW |
| Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 313 hp 233 kW |
BMW Z4 Coupe (E86) M 3.2 has 30 hp more than Nissan 350Z (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V.
The biggest power difference is between Nissan 350Z (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V and BMW Z4 Coupe (E86) M 3.2: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
| Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 352 Nm 260 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | 1,425 kg 3,142 lb |
| Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | 5.0 s |
| Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 5.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW Z4 Coupe (E86) M 3.2 and Nissan 350Z (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V: 0.8 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | 241 hp/t 179 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
| Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 203 hp/t 151 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | 343 hp 256 kW | 5.0 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 313 hp 233 kW | 5.8 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 343 hp 256 kW | 313 hp 233 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | 352 Nm 260 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.0 s | 5.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,425 kg 3,142 lb | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 455 km 282 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 245 L 8.7 cu ft | 235 L 8.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 241 hp/t 179 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 203 hp/t 151 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW Z4 Coupe (E86) M 3.2 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.1 L/100 km19.4 mpg US23.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.18 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.08 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,815 L479 US gal399 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,176 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW Z4 Coupe (E86) M 3.2
- Has 30 hp more
- Has 13 Nm more
- Is 120 kg lighter
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 38 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 10 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Nissan 350Z (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























