BMW Z4 Coupe (E86)
Car comparison
BMW Z4 Coupe (E86) M 3.2vsBMW Z4 (E89) 30i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW Z4 (E89)
30i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW Z4 Coupe (E86) M 3.2
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.0 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful343 hp256 kW
- Highest torque365 Nm269 lb-ft
- Lightest1,425 kg3,142 lb
- Best power-to-weight241 hp/t179 kW/t4.2 kg/hp
- Largest trunk245 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score69/100
- Best practicality score35/100
BMW Z4 (E89) 30i
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.4 L/100 km19.0 mpg US22.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range647 km402 mi
- Best economy score84/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | BMWZ4 (E89)30i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 343hp256kW | 258hp192kW |
| Torque | 365Nm269lb-ft | 315Nm232lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,425kg3,142lb | 1,490kg3,285lb |
| Gross weight | 1,730kg3,814lb | 1,745kg3,847lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 62.0s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 76.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.0s | 5.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.7s Calculated | 20.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.8s Calculated | 5.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.1L/100 km19.4mpg US23.3mpg UK | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 18.2L/100 km12.9mpg US15.5mpg UK | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.1s Calculated | 13.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 241hp/t179kW/t109hp/1000 lb Calculated | 173hp/t129kW/t79hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 256Nm/t171lb-ft/ton Calculated | 211Nm/t141lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 455km282mi Calculated | 647km402mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,246cc198cu in | 2,996cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,113mm162in | 4,239mm167in |
| Width | 1,781mm70in | 1,790mm70in |
| Height | 1,271mm50in | 1,291mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,497mm98in | 2,496mm98in |
| Front track | 1,486mm59in | 1,511mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,516mm60in | 1,537mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 245L | 180L |
| Max trunk volume | 300L | 310L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW Z4 Coupe (E86) M 3.2: Power / Torque
- BMW Z4 (E89) 30i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | 7,900 rpm | 4,900 rpm | 8,150 rpm |
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i | 6,600 rpm | 2,500 rpm | 6,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | BMWZ4 (E89)30i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.8 s | 5.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.0 s | 5.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.7 s | 20.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.6 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.0 s | 11.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.1 s | 13.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 179 km/h 111 mph | 168 km/h 105 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | 343 hp 256 kW |
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i | 258 hp 192 kW |
BMW Z4 Coupe (E86) M 3.2 has 85 hp more than BMW Z4 (E89) 30i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW Z4 (E89) 30i and BMW Z4 Coupe (E86) M 3.2: 85 hp (63 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i | 315 Nm 232 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | 1,425 kg 3,142 lb |
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | 5.0 s |
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i | 5.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW Z4 Coupe (E86) M 3.2 and BMW Z4 (E89) 30i: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK |
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW Z4 (E89) 30i and BMW Z4 Coupe (E86) M 3.2: 3.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | 241 hp/t 179 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i | 173 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | 455 km 282 mi |
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i | 647 km 402 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | 343 hp 256 kW | 5.0 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i | 258 hp 192 kW | 5.8 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 |
| 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i |
| 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW Z4 Coupe (E86) M 3.2 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | 5.0 s |
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | 241 hp/t 179 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK |
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i | 173 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | BMWZ4 (E89)30i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 343 hp 256 kW | 258 hp 192 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | 315 Nm 232 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.0 s | 5.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,425 kg 3,142 lb | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 455 km 282 mi | 647 km 402 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 245 L 8.7 cu ft | 180 L 6.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 241 hp/t 179 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 173 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW Z4 Coupe (E86) M 3.2 | BMW Z4 (E89) 30i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.1 L/100 km19.4 mpg US23.3 mpg UK | 8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.18 LC100 km | 14.88 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.08 LC100 mi | 23.94 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,815 L479 US gal399 UK gal | 1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,176 LC/year | 2,231 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW Z4 Coupe (E86) M 3.2
- Has 85 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 65 kg lighter
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 68 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 65 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
BMW Z4 (E89) 30i
- Uses 3.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 193 km (120 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























