BMW X6 M (E71) · Facelift 2012
Car comparison
BMW X6 M (E71) · Facelift 2012 4.4 V8vsJeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) SRT8 6.4 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2)
SRT8 6.4 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.7 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful560 hp418 kW
- Highest torque680 Nm502 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight235 hp/t175 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption13.9 L/100 km16.9 mpg US20.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption19.3 L/100 km12.2 mpg US14.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range612 km380 mi
- Best overall score83/100
- Best performance score79/100
- Best economy score70/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) SRT8 6.4 V8
- Lightest2,336 kg5,150 lb
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)SRT8 6.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 560hp418kW | 477hp356kW |
| Torque | 680Nm502lb-ft | 630Nm465lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,380kg5,247lb | 2,336kg5,150lb |
| Gross weight | 2,905kg6,404lb | 2,948kg6,499lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 257 km/h 160 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 74.5s99% target: 254 km/h / 158 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.7s | 5.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.9s Calculated | 19.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.5s Calculated | 4.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13.9L/100 km16.9mpg US20.3mpg UK | 16.8L/100 km14mpg US16.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 19.3L/100 km12.2mpg US14.6mpg UK | 19.6L/100 km12mpg US14.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK | 13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.9s Calculated | 13.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 235hp/t175kW/t107hp/1000 lb Calculated | 204hp/t152kW/t93hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 286Nm/t191lb-ft/ton Calculated | 270Nm/t180lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 612km380mi Calculated | 554km344mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,395cc268cu in | 6,417cc392cu in |
| Length | 4,876mm192in | 4,859mm191in |
| Width | 1,983mm78in | 1,958mm77in |
| Height | 1,983mm78in | 1,756mm69in |
| Wheelbase | 2,933mm115in | 2,915mm115in |
| Front track | 1,660mm65in | 1,617mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,672mm66in | 1,633mm64in |
| Ground clearance | - | 211mm8in |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 93L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
- Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) SRT8 6.4 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 1,500-5,650 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)SRT8 6.4 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 4,300 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)SRT8 6.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.5 s | 4.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.7 s | 5.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.9 s | 19.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 257 km/h 160 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 8.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.8 s | 11.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.9 s | 13.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 175 km/h 109 mph | 172 km/h 107 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | 560 hp 418 kW |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)SRT8 6.4 V8 | 477 hp 356 kW |
BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8 has 83 hp more than Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) SRT8 6.4 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) SRT8 6.4 V8 and BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8: 83 hp (62 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)SRT8 6.4 V8 | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | 2,380 kg 5,247 lb |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)SRT8 6.4 V8 | 2,336 kg 5,150 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)SRT8 6.4 V8 | 257 km/h 160 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | 4.7 s |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)SRT8 6.4 V8 | 5.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8 and Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) SRT8 6.4 V8: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)SRT8 6.4 V8 | 16.8 L/100 km 14.0 mpg US 16.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8 and Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) SRT8 6.4 V8: 2.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)SRT8 6.4 V8 | 204 hp/t 152 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | 612 km 380 mi |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)SRT8 6.4 V8 | 554 km 344 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | 560 hp 418 kW | 4.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)SRT8 6.4 V8 | 477 hp 356 kW | 5.0 s | 257 km/h 160 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)SRT8 6.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 |
| 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)SRT8 6.4 V8 |
| 16.8 L/100 km 14.0 mpg US 16.8 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)SRT8 6.4 V8 | 16.8 L/100 km 14.0 mpg US 16.8 mpg UK | 5.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)SRT8 6.4 V8 | 204 hp/t 152 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 16.8 L/100 km 14.0 mpg US 16.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)SRT8 6.4 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 560 hp 418 kW | 477 hp 356 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.7 s | 5.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 257 km/h 160 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,380 kg 5,247 lb | 2,336 kg 5,150 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK | 16.8 L/100 km 14.0 mpg US 16.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 612 km 380 mi | 554 km 344 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 204 hp/t 152 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8 | Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) SRT8 6.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.9 L/100 km16.9 mpg US20.3 mpg UK | 16.8 L/100 km14 mpg US16.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 24.33 LC100 km | 29.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 39.15 LC100 mi | 47.31 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,085 L551 US gal459 UK gal | 2,520 L666 US gal554 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,649 LC/year | 4,410 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8
- Has 83 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 31 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 58 km (36 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) SRT8 6.4 V8
- Is 44 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























