Car comparison

BMW X6 (F16) 40dvsLand Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW X6 (F16)

40d

313 hp2993 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2014-2018
VS

Land Rover Range Rover IV

4.4 V8

339 hp4367 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2012-2017

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW X6 (F16) 40d

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph
  • Highest torque
    630 Nm
    465 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    2,105 kg
    4,641 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    149 hp/t
    111 kW/t
    6.7 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.3 L/100 km
    37.3 mpg US
    44.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.1 L/100 km
    33.1 mpg US
    39.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.8 L/100 km
    40.6 mpg US
    48.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    165 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,349 km
    838 mi
  • Largest trunk
    550 L
  • Best overall score
    73/100
  • Best performance score
    66/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100
  • Best practicality score
    87/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWX6 (F16)40dLand RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8
Power
313hp233kW
339hp253kW
Torque
630Nm465lb-ft
600Nm443lb-ft
Curb weight
2,105kg4,641lb
2,360kg5,203lb
Gross weight
2,820kg6,217lb
-
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
To 99% top speed
74.4s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
86.3s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.8s
6.9s
0-200 km/h
24.2s
Calculated
41.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.5s
Calculated
6.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.0s
Calculated
15.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
149hp/t111kW/t67hp/1000 lb
Calculated
144hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
299Nm/t200lb-ft/ton
Calculated
254Nm/t170lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,349km838mi
Calculated
1,207km750mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,993cc183cu in
4,367cc266cu in
Length
4,909mm193in
4,999mm197in
Width
1,989mm78in
1,983mm78in
Height
1,702mm67in
1,835mm72in
Wheelbase
2,933mm115in
2,922mm115in
Front track
1,640mm65in
1,690mm67in
Rear track
1,706mm67in
1,683mm66in
Ground clearance
212mm8in
-
Trunk volume
550L
550L
Max trunk volume
1,525L
2,030L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
85L
105L
CO2 emissions
165g/km
229g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW X6 (F16) 40dLand Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8PowerTorque
  • BMW X6 (F16) 40d: Power / Torque
  • Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMWX6 (F16)40d4,400 rpm1,500-2,500 rpm4,650 rpm
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V84,000 rpm2,000 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWX6 (F16)40dLand RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.5 s
6.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.8 s
6.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
24.2 s
41.0 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.2 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.0 s
6.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.1 s
9.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.8 s
12.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.0 s
15.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
162 km/h
101 mph
148 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)40d
313 hp
233 kW
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8
339 hp
253 kW

Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8 has 26 hp more than BMW X6 (F16) 40d.

The biggest power difference is between BMW X6 (F16) 40d and Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8: 26 hp (19 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)40d
630 Nm
465 lb-ft
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8
600 Nm
443 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)40d
2,105 kg
4,641 lb
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8
2,360 kg
5,203 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)40d
240 km/h
149 mph
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8
217 km/h
135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)40d5.8 s
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V86.9 s

Although Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8 has more power, BMW X6 (F16) 40d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X6 (F16) 40d and Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8: 1.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)40d
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X6 (F16) 40d and Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8: 2.4 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)40d
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8
144 hp/t
107 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)40d
1,349 km
838 mi
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8
1,207 km
750 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWX6 (F16)40d
313 hp
233 kW
5.8 s
240 km/h
149 mph
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8
339 hp
253 kW
6.9 s
217 km/h
135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWX6 (F16)40d
Power
313 hp
233 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,909 mm
193.3 in
Height
1,702 mm
67.0 in
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8
Power
339 hp
253 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,999 mm
196.8 in
Height
1,835 mm
72.2 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMWX6 (F16)40d
Power
313 hp
233 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8
Power
339 hp
253 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK

BMW X6 (F16) 40d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMWX6 (F16)40d
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
5.8 s
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK
6.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMWX6 (F16)40d
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8
144 hp/t
107 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWX6 (F16)40dLand RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8
Power
313 hp
233 kW
339 hp
253 kW
Torque
630 Nm
465 lb-ft
600 Nm
443 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.8 s
6.9 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
Lightness
2,105 kg
4,641 lb
2,360 kg
5,203 lb
Fuel consumption
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,909 mm
193.3 in
Height
1,702 mm
67.0 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,999 mm
196.8 in
Height
1,835 mm
72.2 in
Range score
1,349 km
838 mi
1,207 km
750 mi
CO2 score
165 g/km
229 g/km
Trunk score
550 L
19.4 cu ft
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
144 hp/t
107 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW X6 (F16) 40dLand Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8
Consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK8.7 L/100 km27 mpg US32.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.03 LC100 km15.22 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi17.74 LC100 mi24.50 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used945 L250 US gal208 UK gal1,305 L345 US gal287 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,654 LC/year2,284 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW X6 (F16) 40d

  • Has 30 Nm more
  • Is 255 kg lighter
  • Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 23 km/h (14 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 2.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 142 km (88 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 64 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power

Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8

  • Has 26 hp more

Pros

  • Most powerful

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW X6 (F16) 40d
Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

40d
35i
VS
BMWX6 (F16)40dvsBMWX6 (E71)35i
4.4 V8
GL 400
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8vsMercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 400
40d
40i
VS
BMWX6 (F16)40dvsBMWX6 (G06)40i
4.4 V8
3.0 V6 TSI
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8vsVolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20143.0 V6 TSI
40d
40d
VS
BMWX6 (F16)40dvsBMWX6 (G06 LCI)Facelift 202340d
4.4 V8
2.0 T6
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
40d
35d
VS
BMWX6 (F16)40dvsBMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435d
4.4 V8
GLS 400
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8vsMercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 400
40d
35d
VS
BMWX6 (F16)40dvsBMWX3 (F25)35d
4.4 V8
4.2 TDI V8
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8vsVolkswagenTouareg II (7P)4.2 TDI V8
40d
40i
VS
BMWX6 (F16)40dvsBMWX7 (G07)40i
4.4 V8
3.0 V6 GDI
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8vsMaseratiLevante3.0 V6 GDI
BMW X6 (F16) 40d vs Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster