Car comparison

BMW X6 (F16) 30dvsLand Rover Range Rover IV 3.0 SD V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW X6 (F16)

30d

258 hp2993 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2014-2018
VS

Land Rover Range Rover IV

3.0 SD V6

292 hp2993 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2014-2017

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW X6 (F16) 30d

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    230 km/h
    143 mph
  • Lightest
    2,065 kg
    4,553 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    125 hp/t
    93 kW/t
    8.0 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.0 L/100 km
    39.2 mpg US
    47.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.6 L/100 km
    42.0 mpg US
    50.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    159 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,417 km
    880 mi
  • Best performance score
    58/100
  • Best economy score
    91/100

Land Rover Range Rover IV 3.0 SD V6

  • Most powerful
    292 hp
    218 kW
  • Highest torque
    600 Nm
    443 lb-ft
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.7 L/100 km
    35.1 mpg US
    42.2 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    68/100
  • Best practicality score
    91/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWX6 (F16)30dLand RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6
Power
258hp192kW
292hp218kW
Torque
560Nm413lb-ft
600Nm443lb-ft
Curb weight
2,065kg4,553lb
2,394kg5,278lb
Gross weight
2,780kg6,129lb
-
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
To 99% top speed
84.4s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
93.9s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.7s
6.9s
0-200 km/h
31.4s
Calculated
42.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.3s
Calculated
6.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.8s
Calculated
15.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
271Nm/t181lb-ft/ton
Calculated
251Nm/t168lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,417km880mi
Calculated
1,250km777mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,993cc183cu in
2,993cc183cu in
Length
4,909mm193in
4,999mm197in
Width
1,989mm78in
1,983mm78in
Height
1,702mm67in
1,835mm72in
Wheelbase
2,933mm115in
2,922mm115in
Front track
1,640mm65in
-
Rear track
1,706mm67in
-
Ground clearance
212mm8in
-
Trunk volume
550L
-
Max trunk volume
1,525L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
85L
80L
CO2 emissions
159g/km
169g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW X6 (F16) 30dLand Rover Range Rover IV 3.0 SD V6PowerTorque
  • BMW X6 (F16) 30d: Power / Torque
  • Land Rover Range Rover IV 3.0 SD V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMWX6 (F16)30d4,000 rpm1,500-3,000 rpm4,250 rpm
Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V64,000 rpm1,500-3,000 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWX6 (F16)30dLand RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.3 s
6.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.7 s
6.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
31.4 s
42.5 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.3 s
6.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.6 s
9.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.4 s
12.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.8 s
15.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
153 km/h
95 mph
147 km/h
91 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)30d
258 hp
192 kW
Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6
292 hp
218 kW

Land Rover Range Rover IV 3.0 SD V6 has 34 hp more than BMW X6 (F16) 30d.

The biggest power difference is between BMW X6 (F16) 30d and Land Rover Range Rover IV 3.0 SD V6: 34 hp (25 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)30d
560 Nm
413 lb-ft
Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6
600 Nm
443 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)30d
2,065 kg
4,553 lb
Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6
2,394 kg
5,278 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)30d
230 km/h
143 mph
Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6
218 km/h
135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)30d6.7 s
Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V66.9 s

Although Land Rover Range Rover IV 3.0 SD V6 has more power, BMW X6 (F16) 30d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X6 (F16) 30d and Land Rover Range Rover IV 3.0 SD V6: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)30d
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)30d
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6
122 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)30d
1,417 km
880 mi
Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6
1,250 km
777 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWX6 (F16)30d
258 hp
192 kW
6.7 s
230 km/h
143 mph
Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6
292 hp
218 kW
6.9 s
218 km/h
135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWX6 (F16)30d
Power
258 hp
192 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,909 mm
193.3 in
Height
1,702 mm
67.0 in
Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6
Power
292 hp
218 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,999 mm
196.8 in
Height
1,835 mm
72.2 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMWX6 (F16)30d
Power
258 hp
192 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6
Power
292 hp
218 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

BMW X6 (F16) 30d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMWX6 (F16)30d
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
6.7 s
Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
6.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMWX6 (F16)30d
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6
122 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWX6 (F16)30dLand RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6
Power
258 hp
192 kW
292 hp
218 kW
Torque
560 Nm
413 lb-ft
600 Nm
443 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.7 s
6.9 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
Lightness
2,065 kg
4,553 lb
2,394 kg
5,278 lb
Fuel consumption
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,909 mm
193.3 in
Height
1,702 mm
67.0 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,999 mm
196.8 in
Height
1,835 mm
72.2 in
Range score
1,417 km
880 mi
1,250 km
777 mi
CO2 score
159 g/km
169 g/km
Trunk score
550 L
19.4 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
122 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW X6 (F16) 30dLand Rover Range Rover IV 3.0 SD V6
Consumption6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.50 LC100 km11.20 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.90 LC100 mi18.02 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used900 L238 US gal198 UK gal960 L254 US gal211 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,575 LC/year1,680 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW X6 (F16) 30d

  • Is 329 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 167 km (104 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 10 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power

Land Rover Range Rover IV 3.0 SD V6

  • Has 34 hp more
  • Has 40 Nm more

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW X6 (F16) 30d
Land Rover Range Rover IV 3.0 SD V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

30d
40d
VS
BMWX6 (F16)30dvsBMWX6 (E71)40d
3.0 SD V6
3.0 V6
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6vsMaseratiLevante3.0 V6
30d
30d
VS
BMWX6 (F16)30dvsBMWX6 (G06)30d
3.0 SD V6
3.6 V6
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6vsPorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6
30d
30d
VS
BMWX6 (F16)30dvsBMWX6 (G06 LCI)Facelift 202330d
3.0 SD V6
3.0 V6 TDI
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6vsVolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20143.0 V6 TDI
30d
30d
VS
BMWX6 (F16)30dvsBMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201430d
3.0 SD V6
35i
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6vsBMWX6 (F16)35i
30d
25d
VS
BMWX6 (F16)30dvsBMWX1 (F48)25d
3.0 SD V6
3.0d V6
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6vsJaguarF-Pace3.0d V6
30d
30d
VS
BMWX6 (F16)30dvsBMWX7 (G07)30d
3.0 SD V6
2.0 T6
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
BMW X6 (F16) 30d vs Land Rover Range Rover IV 3.0 SD V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster