Car comparison

BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8vsJeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) · Facelift 2013 SRT 6.4 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW X5 M (F85)

4.4 V8

575 hp4395 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2015-2018
VS

Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) · Facelift 2013

SRT 6.4 V8

481 hp6417 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSUV2016-2017

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.2 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    575 hp
    429 kW
  • Highest torque
    750 Nm
    553 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    2,275 kg
    5,016 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    253 hp/t
    188 kW/t
    4.0 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    11.1 L/100 km
    21.2 mpg US
    25.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    14.7 L/100 km
    16.0 mpg US
    19.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    9.0 L/100 km
    26.1 mpg US
    31.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    766 km
    476 mi
  • Best overall score
    85/100
  • Best performance score
    82/100
  • Best economy score
    77/100
  • Best practicality score
    91/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT 6.4 V8
Power
575hp429kW
481hp359kW
Torque
750Nm553lb-ft
637Nm470lb-ft
Curb weight
2,275kg5,016lb
2,315kg5,104lb
Gross weight
2,970kg6,548lb
2,948kg6,499lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
257 km/h
160 mph
To 99% top speed
56.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
72.6s99% target: 254 km/h / 158 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.2s
5.0s
0-200 km/h
15.0s
Calculated
19.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.0s
Calculated
4.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK
15.7L/100 km15mpg US18.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK
18.1L/100 km13mpg US15.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK
12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.3s
Calculated
13.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
253hp/t188kW/t115hp/1000 lb
Calculated
208hp/t155kW/t94hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
330Nm/t221lb-ft/ton
Calculated
275Nm/t184lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
766km476mi
Calculated
592km368mi
Calculated
Displacement
4,395cc268cu in
6,417cc392cu in
Length
4,880mm192in
4,859mm191in
Width
1,985mm78in
1,958mm77in
Height
1,754mm69in
1,717mm68in
Wheelbase
2,933mm115in
2,915mm115in
Front track
1,666mm66in
1,617mm64in
Rear track
1,667mm66in
1,633mm64in
Ground clearance
195mm8in
211mm8in
Trunk volume
650L
-
Max trunk volume
1,870L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
85L
93L
CO2 emissions
258g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2013 SRT 6.4 V8PowerTorque
  • BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
  • Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2013 SRT 6.4 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V86,000-6,500 rpm2,200-5,000 rpm6,750 rpm
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT 6.4 V86,000 rpm4,300 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT 6.4 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.0 s
4.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.2 s
5.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
15.0 s
19.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
257 km/h
160 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.0 s
2.1 s
330 ft
101 m
5.3 s
5.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.0 s
8.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.4 s
11.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.3 s
13.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
184 km/h
115 mph
172 km/h
107 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
575 hp
429 kW
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT 6.4 V8
481 hp
359 kW

BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8 has 94 hp more than Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2013 SRT 6.4 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2013 SRT 6.4 V8 and BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8: 94 hp (70 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
750 Nm
553 lb-ft
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT 6.4 V8
637 Nm
470 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
2,275 kg
5,016 lb
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT 6.4 V8
2,315 kg
5,104 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT 6.4 V8
257 km/h
160 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V84.2 s
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT 6.4 V85.0 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8 and Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2013 SRT 6.4 V8: 0.8 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT 6.4 V8
15.7 L/100 km
15.0 mpg US
18.0 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8 and Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2013 SRT 6.4 V8: 4.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
253 hp/t
188 kW/t
4.0 kg/hp
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT 6.4 V8
208 hp/t
155 kW/t
4.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
766 km
476 mi
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT 6.4 V8
592 km
368 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
575 hp
429 kW
4.2 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT 6.4 V8
481 hp
359 kW
5.0 s
257 km/h
160 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
Power
575 hp
429 kW
0-100 km/h4.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
650 L
23.0 cu ft
Length
4,880 mm
192.1 in
Height
1,754 mm
69.1 in
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT 6.4 V8
Power
481 hp
359 kW
0-100 km/h5.0 s
Top speed
257 km/h
160 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,859 mm
191.3 in
Height
1,717 mm
67.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
Power
575 hp
429 kW
0-100 km/h4.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT 6.4 V8
Power
481 hp
359 kW
0-100 km/h5.0 s
Top speed
257 km/h
160 mph
15.7 L/100 km
15.0 mpg US
18.0 mpg UK

BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK
4.2 s
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT 6.4 V8
15.7 L/100 km
15.0 mpg US
18.0 mpg UK
5.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
253 hp/t
188 kW/t
4.0 kg/hp
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT 6.4 V8
208 hp/t
155 kW/t
4.8 kg/hp
15.7 L/100 km
15.0 mpg US
18.0 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT 6.4 V8
Power
575 hp
429 kW
481 hp
359 kW
Torque
750 Nm
553 lb-ft
637 Nm
470 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.2 s
5.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
257 km/h
160 mph
Lightness
2,275 kg
5,016 lb
2,315 kg
5,104 lb
Fuel consumption
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK
15.7 L/100 km
15.0 mpg US
18.0 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
650 L
23.0 cu ft
Length
4,880 mm
192.1 in
Height
1,754 mm
69.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,859 mm
191.3 in
Height
1,717 mm
67.6 in
Range score
766 km
476 mi
592 km
368 mi
CO2 score
258 g/km
-
Trunk score
650 L
23.0 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
253 hp/t
188 kW/t
4.0 kg/hp
208 hp/t
155 kW/t
4.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2013 SRT 6.4 V8
Consumption11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK15.7 L/100 km15 mpg US18 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km19.43 LC100 km27.47 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi31.26 LC100 mi44.22 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,665 L440 US gal366 UK gal2,355 L622 US gal518 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,914 LC/year4,121 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8

  • Has 94 hp more
  • Has 113 Nm more
  • Is 40 kg lighter
  • Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 4.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 45 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 173 km (108 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8
Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) SRT 6.4 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

4.4 V8
4.4
VS
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8vsBMWX5 M (E70)4.4
SRT 6.4 V8
50i
VS
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT 6.4 V8vsBMWX6 (F16)50i
4.4 V8
4.4 V8
VS
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8vsBMWX5 M (F95)4.4 V8
SRT 6.4 V8
GLS 500
VS
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT 6.4 V8vsMercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 500
4.4 V8
4.4 V8
VS
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8vsBMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8
SRT 6.4 V8
90D 90 kWh
VS
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT 6.4 V8vsTeslaModel X90D 90 kWh
4.4 V8
4.4 V8
VS
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8vsBMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8
SRT 6.4 V8
GTS 3.6 V6
VS
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT 6.4 V8vsPorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014GTS 3.6 V6
4.4 V8
M50i V8
VS
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8vsBMWX7 (G07)M50i V8
SRT 6.4 V8
S 3.0 V6 GDI
VS
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT 6.4 V8vsMaseratiLevanteS 3.0 V6 GDI
4.4 V8
4.4 V8
VS
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8vsBMWX6 M (E71)4.4 V8
SRT 6.4 V8
GLS 580 V8
VS
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT 6.4 V8vsMercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 580 V8
BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) · Facelift 2013 SRT 6.4 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster