Car comparison

Jaguar F-Pace SVR 5.0 V8vsBMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar F-Pace

SVR 5.0 V8

550 hp5000 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticSuperchargedSUV2018-2020
VS

BMW X5 M (F85)

4.4 V8

575 hp4395 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.2 s
  • Most powerful
    575 hp
    429 kW
  • Highest torque
    750 Nm
    553 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    11.1 L/100 km
    21.2 mpg US
    25.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    258 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    766 km
    476 mi
  • Best economy score
    77/100
  • Best practicality score
    91/100

Jaguar F-Pace SVR 5.0 V8

  • Fastest top speed
    283 km/h
    176 mph
  • Lightest
    1,995 kg
    4,398 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    276 hp/t
    206 kW/t
    3.6 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    650 L
  • Best overall score
    86/100
  • Best performance score
    84/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
Power
550hp410kW
575hp429kW
Torque
680Nm502lb-ft
750Nm553lb-ft
Curb weight
1,995kg4,398lb
2,275kg5,016lb
Gross weight-
2,970kg6,548lb
Top speed
283 km/h
176 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
55.0s99% target: 280 km/h / 174 mph
Calculated
56.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.3s
4.2s
0-200 km/h
13.2s
Calculated
15.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.1s
Calculated
4.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK
11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.2s
Calculated
12.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
276hp/t206kW/t125hp/1000 lb
Calculated
253hp/t188kW/t115hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
341Nm/t228lb-ft/ton
Calculated
330Nm/t221lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
701km435mi
Calculated
766km476mi
Calculated
Displacement
5,000cc305cu in
4,395cc268cu in
Length
4,739mm187in
4,880mm192in
Width
2,071mm82in
1,985mm78in
Height
1,670mm66in
1,754mm69in
Wheelbase
2,874mm113in
2,933mm115in
Front track
1,648mm65in
1,666mm66in
Rear track
1,666mm66in
1,667mm66in
Ground clearance-
195mm8in
Trunk volume
650L
650L
Max trunk volume-
1,870L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
82L
85L
CO2 emissions
279g/km
258g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar F-Pace SVR 5.0 V8BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8PowerTorque
  • Jaguar F-Pace SVR 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
  • BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V86,000-6,500 rpm3,500-4,000 rpm6,750 rpm
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V86,000-6,500 rpm2,200-5,000 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.1 s
4.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.3 s
4.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
13.2 s
15.0 s
Top speed
283 km/h
176 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.0 s
330 ft
101 m
5.4 s
5.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.1 s
8.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.3 s
10.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.2 s
12.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
193 km/h
120 mph
184 km/h
115 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8
550 hp
410 kW
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
575 hp
429 kW

BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8 has 25 hp more than Jaguar F-Pace SVR 5.0 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar F-Pace SVR 5.0 V8 and BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8: 25 hp (19 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8
680 Nm
502 lb-ft
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
750 Nm
553 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8
1,995 kg
4,398 lb
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
2,275 kg
5,016 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8
283 km/h
176 mph
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V84.3 s
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V84.2 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8 and Jaguar F-Pace SVR 5.0 V8: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8
11.7 L/100 km
20.1 mpg US
24.1 mpg UK
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8 and Jaguar F-Pace SVR 5.0 V8: 0.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8
276 hp/t
206 kW/t
3.6 kg/hp
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
253 hp/t
188 kW/t
4.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8
701 km
435 mi
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
766 km
476 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8
550 hp
410 kW
4.3 s
283 km/h
176 mph
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
575 hp
429 kW
4.2 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8
Power
550 hp
410 kW
0-100 km/h4.3 s
Top speed
283 km/h
176 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
650 L
23.0 cu ft
Length
4,739 mm
186.6 in
Height
1,670 mm
65.7 in
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
Power
575 hp
429 kW
0-100 km/h4.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
650 L
23.0 cu ft
Length
4,880 mm
192.1 in
Height
1,754 mm
69.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8
Power
550 hp
410 kW
0-100 km/h4.3 s
Top speed
283 km/h
176 mph
11.7 L/100 km
20.1 mpg US
24.1 mpg UK
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
Power
575 hp
429 kW
0-100 km/h4.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK

BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8
11.7 L/100 km
20.1 mpg US
24.1 mpg UK
4.3 s
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK
4.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8
276 hp/t
206 kW/t
3.6 kg/hp
11.7 L/100 km
20.1 mpg US
24.1 mpg UK
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
253 hp/t
188 kW/t
4.0 kg/hp
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
Power
550 hp
410 kW
575 hp
429 kW
Torque
680 Nm
502 lb-ft
750 Nm
553 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.3 s
4.2 s
Top speed
283 km/h
176 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,995 kg
4,398 lb
2,275 kg
5,016 lb
Fuel consumption
11.7 L/100 km
20.1 mpg US
24.1 mpg UK
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
650 L
23.0 cu ft
Length
4,739 mm
186.6 in
Height
1,670 mm
65.7 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
650 L
23.0 cu ft
Length
4,880 mm
192.1 in
Height
1,754 mm
69.1 in
Range score
701 km
435 mi
766 km
476 mi
CO2 score
279 g/km
258 g/km
Trunk score
650 L
23.0 cu ft
650 L
23.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
276 hp/t
206 kW/t
3.6 kg/hp
253 hp/t
188 kW/t
4.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar F-Pace SVR 5.0 V8BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8
Consumption11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km20.47 LC100 km19.43 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi32.95 LC100 mi31.26 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,755 L464 US gal386 UK gal1,665 L440 US gal366 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,071 LC/year2,914 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar F-Pace SVR 5.0 V8

  • Is 280 kg lighter
  • Has 23 km/h (14 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 23 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Highest CO2 emissions

BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8

  • Has 25 hp more
  • Has 70 Nm more
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 65 km (40 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 21 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar F-Pace SVR 5.0 V8
BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

SVR 5.0 V8
SVR 5.0i V8
VS
JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 2020SVR 5.0i V8
4.4 V8
4.4
VS
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8vsBMWX5 M (E70)4.4
SVR 5.0 V8
GTS 3.8 V8
VS
JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8vsMaseratiLevanteGTS 3.8 V8
4.4 V8
4.4 V8
VS
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8vsBMWX5 M (F95)4.4 V8
SVR 5.0 V8
4.0 V8
VS
JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8vsBentleyBentayga4.0 V8
4.4 V8
4.4 V8
VS
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8vsBMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8
SVR 5.0 V8
Turbo 4.0 V8
VS
JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8vsPorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8
4.4 V8
4.4 V8
VS
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8vsBMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8
SVR 5.0 V8
4.0 V8
VS
JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8vsBentleyBentaygaFacelift 20204.0 V8
4.4 V8
M50i V8
VS
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8vsBMWX7 (G07)M50i V8
SVR 5.0 V8
2.9T Bi-Turbo V6
VS
JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8vsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6
4.4 V8
4.4 V8
VS
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8vsBMWX6 M (E71)4.4 V8
Jaguar F-Pace SVR 5.0 V8 vs BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster