BMW X5 (E70 LCI) · Facelift 2010
Car comparison
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) · Facelift 2010 M50d · Stage 3vsBMW X5 (E70 LCI) · Facelift 2010 M50d · Stage 2vsBMW X5 (E70 LCI) · Facelift 2010 M50d · Stage 1vsBMW X5 (E70 LCI) · Facelift 2010 M50d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X5 (E70 LCI) · Facelift 2010
M50d (Stage 2)
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) · Facelift 2010
M50d (Stage 1)
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) · Facelift 2010
M50d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d (Stage 3) 591 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.1 s
- Fastest top speed286 km/h178 mph
- Most powerful591 hp440 kW
- Highest torque1,184 Nm873 lb-ft
- Lightest2,225 kg4,905 lb
- Best power-to-weight265 hp/t198 kW/t3.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,133 km704 mi
- Best overall score87/100
- Best performance score85/100
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d (Stage 3)591 hp | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d (Stage 2)514 hp | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d (Stage 1)457 hp | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d381 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 591hp440kW+210 hp | 514hp384kW+133 hp | 457hp341kW+76 hp | 381hp284kW |
| Torque | 1,184Nm873lb-ft+444 Nm | 1,036Nm764lb-ft+296 Nm | 925Nm682lb-ft+185 Nm | 740Nm546lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,225kg4,905lb | 2,225kg4,905lb | 2,225kg4,905lb | 2,225kg4,905lb |
| Gross weight | 2,830kg6,239lb | 2,830kg6,239lb | 2,830kg6,239lb | 2,830kg6,239lb |
| Top speed | 286 km/h 178 mph | 273 km/h 170 mph | 263 km/h 163 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 57.3s99% target: 283 km/h / 176 mph-19.0 s Calculated | 63.1s99% target: 270 km/h / 168 mph-13.2 s Calculated | 67.9s99% target: 260 km/h / 162 mph-8.4 s Calculated | 76.3s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.1s-1.3 s | 4.5s-0.9 s | 4.8s-0.6 s | 5.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.9s-8.7 s Calculated | 15.1s-6.4 s Calculated | 17.3s-4.2 s Calculated | 21.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.9s-1.2 s Calculated | 4.3s-0.9 s Calculated | 4.6s-0.5 s Calculated | 5.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.0s-1.6 s Calculated | 12.6s-1.1 s Calculated | 13.0s-0.7 s Calculated | 13.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 265hp/t198kW/t120hp/1000 lb Calculated | 231hp/t172kW/t105hp/1000 lb Calculated | 205hp/t153kW/t93hp/1000 lb Calculated | 171hp/t128kW/t78hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 532Nm/t356lb-ft/ton Calculated | 466Nm/t312lb-ft/ton Calculated | 416Nm/t278lb-ft/ton Calculated | 333Nm/t223lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,133km704mi Calculated | 1,133km704mi Calculated | 1,133km704mi Calculated | 1,133km704mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | 2,993cc183cu in | 2,993cc183cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,857mm191in | 4,857mm191in | 4,857mm191in | 4,857mm191in |
| Width | 2,010mm79in | 2,010mm79in | 2,010mm79in | 2,010mm79in |
| Height | 1,766mm70in | 1,766mm70in | 1,766mm70in | 1,766mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 2,933mm115in | 2,933mm115in | 2,933mm115in | 2,933mm115in |
| Front track | 1,662mm65in | 1,662mm65in | 1,662mm65in | 1,662mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,702mm67in | 1,702mm67in | 1,702mm67in | 1,702mm67in |
| Doors | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 85L | 85L | 85L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d (Stage 3) 591 hp: Power / Torque
- BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d (Stage 2) 514 hp: Power / Torque
- BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d (Stage 1) 457 hp: Power / Torque
- BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d 381 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d (Stage 3)591 hp | 4,000-4,400 rpm | 2,000-3,000 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d (Stage 2)514 hp | 4,000-4,400 rpm | 2,000-3,000 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d (Stage 1)457 hp | 4,000-4,400 rpm | 2,000-3,000 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d381 hp | 4,000-4,400 rpm | 2,000-3,000 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d (Stage 3)591 hp | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d (Stage 2)514 hp | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d (Stage 1)457 hp | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d381 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.9 s | 4.3 s | 4.6 s | 5.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.1 s | 4.5 s | 4.8 s | 5.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.9 s | 15.1 s | 17.3 s | 21.5 s |
| Top speed | 286 km/h 178 mph | 273 km/h 170 mph | 263 km/h 163 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.1 s | 2.1 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 5.5 s | 5.6 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.9 s | 8.2 s | 8.4 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.2 s | 10.6 s | 10.9 s | 11.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.0 s | 12.6 s | 13.0 s | 13.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 194 km/h 121 mph | 184 km/h 114 mph | 177 km/h 110 mph | 167 km/h 104 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d (Stage 3)591 hp | 591 hp 440 kW |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d (Stage 2)514 hp | 514 hp 384 kW |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d (Stage 1)457 hp | 457 hp 341 kW |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d381 hp | 381 hp 284 kW |
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d (Stage 3) 591 hp has 210 hp more than BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d 381 hp.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d 381 hp and BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d (Stage 3) 591 hp: 210 hp (156 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d (Stage 3)591 hp | 1,184 Nm 873 lb-ft |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d (Stage 2)514 hp | 1,036 Nm 764 lb-ft |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d (Stage 1)457 hp | 925 Nm 682 lb-ft |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d381 hp | 740 Nm 546 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d (Stage 3)591 hp | 2,225 kg 4,905 lb |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d (Stage 2)514 hp | 2,225 kg 4,905 lb |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d (Stage 1)457 hp | 2,225 kg 4,905 lb |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d381 hp | 2,225 kg 4,905 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d (Stage 3)591 hp | 286 km/h 178 mph |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d (Stage 2)514 hp | 273 km/h 170 mph |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d (Stage 1)457 hp | 263 km/h 163 mph |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d381 hp | 250 km/h 155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d (Stage 3)591 hp | 4.1 s |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d (Stage 2)514 hp | 4.5 s |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d (Stage 1)457 hp | 4.8 s |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d381 hp | 5.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d (Stage 3) 591 hp and BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d 381 hp: 1.3 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d (Stage 2) 514 hp and BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d (Stage 1) 457 hp, separated by only 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d (Stage 3)591 hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d (Stage 2)514 hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d (Stage 1)457 hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d381 hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d (Stage 3)591 hp | 265 hp/t 198 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d (Stage 2)514 hp | 231 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d (Stage 1)457 hp | 205 hp/t 153 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d381 hp | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d (Stage 3)591 hp | 1,133 km 704 mi |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d (Stage 2)514 hp | 1,133 km 704 mi |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d (Stage 1)457 hp | 1,133 km 704 mi |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d381 hp | 1,133 km 704 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d (Stage 3)591 hp | 591 hp 440 kW | 4.1 s | 286 km/h 178 mph |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d (Stage 2)514 hp | 514 hp 384 kW | 4.5 s | 273 km/h 170 mph |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d (Stage 1)457 hp | 457 hp 341 kW | 4.8 s | 263 km/h 163 mph |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d381 hp | 381 hp 284 kW | 5.4 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d (Stage 3)591 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d (Stage 2)514 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d (Stage 1)457 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d381 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d (Stage 3)591 hp |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d (Stage 2)514 hp |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d (Stage 1)457 hp |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d381 hp |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d (Stage 3) 591 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d (Stage 3)591 hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 4.1 s |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d (Stage 2)514 hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 4.5 s |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d (Stage 1)457 hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 4.8 s |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d381 hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 5.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d (Stage 3)591 hp | 265 hp/t 198 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d (Stage 2)514 hp | 231 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d (Stage 1)457 hp | 205 hp/t 153 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d381 hp | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d (Stage 3)591 hp | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d (Stage 2)514 hp | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d (Stage 1)457 hp | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d381 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 591 hp 440 kW | 514 hp 384 kW | 457 hp 341 kW | 381 hp 284 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 1,184 Nm 873 lb-ft | 1,036 Nm 764 lb-ft | 925 Nm 682 lb-ft | 740 Nm 546 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.1 s | 4.5 s | 4.8 s | 5.4 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 286 km/h 178 mph | 273 km/h 170 mph | 263 km/h 163 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,225 kg 4,905 lb | 2,225 kg 4,905 lb | 2,225 kg 4,905 lb | 2,225 kg 4,905 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,133 km 704 mi | 1,133 km 704 mi | 1,133 km 704 mi | 1,133 km 704 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 265 hp/t 198 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 231 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 205 hp/t 153 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d (Stage 3) 591 hp | BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d (Stage 2) 514 hp | BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d (Stage 1) 457 hp | BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d 381 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.13 LC100 km | 13.13 LC100 km | 13.13 LC100 km | 13.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,969 LC/year | 1,969 LC/year | 1,969 LC/year | 1,969 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d (Stage 3) 591 hp
- Has 76 hp more
- Has 148 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
- Has 34 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d (Stage 2) 514 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























