BMW X5 (E70 LCI) · Facelift 2010
Car comparison
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) · Facelift 2010 M50dvsBMW X3 (F25 LCI) · Facelift 2014 35d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X3 (F25 LCI) · Facelift 2014
35d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph
- Most powerful381 hp284 kW
- Highest torque740 Nm546 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight171 hp/t128 kW/t5.8 kg/hp
- Best estimated range1,133 km704 mi
- Best overall score78/100
- Best performance score73/100
- Best practicality score90/100
BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 35d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.3 s
- Lightest1,860 kg4,101 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Best economy score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 381hp284kW | 313hp233kW |
| Torque | 740Nm546lb-ft | 630Nm465lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,225kg4,905lb | 1,860kg4,101lb |
| Gross weight | 2,830kg6,239lb | 2,440kg5,379lb |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 76.1s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 65.3s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.4s | 5.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.5s Calculated | 20.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.1s Calculated | 5.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.6s Calculated | 13.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 171hp/t128kW/t78hp/1000 lb Calculated | 168hp/t125kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 333Nm/t223lb-ft/ton Calculated | 339Nm/t227lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,133km704mi Calculated | 1,117km694mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,857mm191in | 4,657mm183in |
| Width | 2,010mm79in | 1,881mm74in |
| Height | 1,766mm70in | 1,661mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,933mm115in | 2,810mm111in |
| Front track | 1,662mm65in | 1,594mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,702mm67in | 1,610mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 204mm8in |
| Trunk volume | - | 550L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,600L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 67L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 157g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d: Power / Torque
- BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 35d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 4,000-4,400 rpm | 2,000-3,000 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435d | 4,400 rpm | 1,500-2,500 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.1 s | 5.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.4 s | 5.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.5 s | 20.6 s |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.4 s | 11.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.6 s | 13.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 167 km/h 104 mph | 170 km/h 105 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 381 hp 284 kW |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435d | 313 hp 233 kW |
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d has 68 hp more than BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 35d.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 35d and BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d: 68 hp (51 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 740 Nm 546 lb-ft |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435d | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 2,225 kg 4,905 lb |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435d | 1,860 kg 4,101 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435d | 245 km/h 152 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 5.4 s |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435d | 5.3 s |
Although BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d has more power, BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 35d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 35d and BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435d | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 35d and BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d: 1.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435d | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 1,133 km 704 mi |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435d | 1,117 km 694 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 381 hp 284 kW | 5.4 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435d | 313 hp 233 kW | 5.3 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435d |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 5.4 s |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435d | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435d | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 381 hp 284 kW | 313 hp 233 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 740 Nm 546 lb-ft | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.4 s | 5.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,225 kg 4,905 lb | 1,860 kg 4,101 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,133 km 704 mi | 1,117 km 694 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 157 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d | BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 35d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.13 LC100 km | 10.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,969 LC/year | 1,575 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d
- Has 68 hp more
- Has 110 Nm more
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 17 km (10 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 35d
- Is 365 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























