Mercedes-Benz M-class (W166)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz M-class (W166) ML 500 V8vsBMW X5 (E70 LCI) · Facelift 2010 M50d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X5 (E70 LCI) · Facelift 2010
M50d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.4 s
- Highest torque740 Nm546 lb-ft
- Lightest2,225 kg4,905 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,133 km704 mi
- Best overall score78/100
- Best performance score73/100
- Best economy score87/100
Mercedes-Benz M-class (W166) ML 500 V8
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful408 hp304 kW
- Best power-to-weight183 hp/t136 kW/t5.5 kg/hp
- Best practicality score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)ML 500 V8 | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 408hp304kW | 381hp284kW |
| Torque | 600Nm443lb-ft | 740Nm546lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,235kg4,927lb | 2,225kg4,905lb |
| Gross weight | 2,950kg6,504lb | 2,830kg6,239lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 87.1s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 76.3s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.6s | 5.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.6s Calculated | 21.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.3s Calculated | 5.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.2L/100 km15.5mpg US18.6mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.8s Calculated | 13.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 183hp/t136kW/t83hp/1000 lb Calculated | 171hp/t128kW/t78hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 268Nm/t180lb-ft/ton Calculated | 333Nm/t223lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 809km503mi Calculated | 1,133km704mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,663cc285cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,804mm189in | 4,857mm191in |
| Width | 1,926mm76in | 2,010mm79in |
| Height | 1,796mm71in | 1,766mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 2,915mm115in | 2,933mm115in |
| Front track | 1,648mm65in | 1,662mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,663mm65in | 1,702mm67in |
| Trunk volume | 690L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 2,010L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 93L | 85L |
| CO2 emissions | 269g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz M-class (W166) ML 500 V8: Power / Torque
- BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)ML 500 V8 | 5,000-5,750 rpm | 1,600-4,750 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 4,000-4,400 rpm | 2,000-3,000 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)ML 500 V8 | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.3 s | 5.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.6 s | 5.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.6 s | 21.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.0 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.6 s | 11.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.8 s | 13.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 166 km/h 103 mph | 167 km/h 104 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)ML 500 V8 | 408 hp 304 kW |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 381 hp 284 kW |
Mercedes-Benz M-class (W166) ML 500 V8 has 27 hp more than BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d and Mercedes-Benz M-class (W166) ML 500 V8: 27 hp (20 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)ML 500 V8 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 740 Nm 546 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)ML 500 V8 | 2,235 kg 4,927 lb |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 2,225 kg 4,905 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)ML 500 V8 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 250 km/h 155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)ML 500 V8 | 5.6 s |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 5.4 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz M-class (W166) ML 500 V8 has more power, BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d and Mercedes-Benz M-class (W166) ML 500 V8: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)ML 500 V8 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d and Mercedes-Benz M-class (W166) ML 500 V8: 4.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)ML 500 V8 | 183 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)ML 500 V8 | 809 km 503 mi |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 1,133 km 704 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)ML 500 V8 | 408 hp 304 kW | 5.6 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 381 hp 284 kW | 5.4 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)ML 500 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)ML 500 V8 |
| 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)ML 500 V8 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | 5.6 s |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 5.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)ML 500 V8 | 183 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)ML 500 V8 | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 408 hp 304 kW | 381 hp 284 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | 740 Nm 546 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.6 s | 5.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,235 kg 4,927 lb | 2,225 kg 4,905 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 809 km 503 mi | 1,133 km 704 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 269 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 690 L 24.4 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 183 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz M-class (W166) ML 500 V8 | BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.13 LC100 km | 13.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.39 LC100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,019 LC/year | 1,969 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz M-class (W166) ML 500 V8
- Has 27 hp more
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d
- Has 140 Nm more
- Is 10 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 4.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 325 km (202 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























