Porsche Cayenne II · Facelift 2014
Car comparison
Porsche Cayenne II · Facelift 2014 S 4.2 diesel V8vsBMW X5 (E70 LCI) · Facelift 2010 M50d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X5 (E70 LCI) · Facelift 2010
M50d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 S 4.2 diesel V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.4 s
- Fastest top speed252 km/h157 mph
- Most powerful385 hp287 kW
- Highest torque850 Nm627 lb-ft
- Lightest2,215 kg4,883 lb
- Best power-to-weight174 hp/t130 kW/t5.8 kg/hp
- Best overall score79/100
- Best performance score73/100
- Best practicality score91/100
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,133 km704 mi
- Best economy score87/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014S 4.2 diesel V8 | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 385hp287kW | 381hp284kW |
| Torque | 850Nm627lb-ft | 740Nm546lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,215kg4,883lb | 2,225kg4,905lb |
| Gross weight | 2,955kg6,515lb | 2,830kg6,239lb |
| Top speed | 252 km/h 157 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 75.8s99% target: 249 km/h / 155 mph Calculated | 76.1s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.4s | 5.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.1s Calculated | 21.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.1s Calculated | 5.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.6s Calculated | 13.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 174hp/t130kW/t79hp/1000 lb Calculated | 171hp/t128kW/t78hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 384Nm/t257lb-ft/ton Calculated | 333Nm/t223lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,063km660mi Calculated | 1,133km704mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,134cc252cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,855mm191in | 4,857mm191in |
| Width | 1,939mm76in | 2,010mm79in |
| Height | 1,705mm67in | 1,766mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 2,895mm114in | 2,933mm115in |
| Front track | 1,655mm65in | 1,662mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,669mm66in | 1,702mm67in |
| Trunk volume | 670L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,780L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 85L |
| CO2 emissions | 209g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 S 4.2 diesel V8: Power / Torque
- BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014S 4.2 diesel V8 | 3,750 rpm | 2,000-2,750 rpm | 4,000 rpm |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 4,000-4,400 rpm | 2,000-3,000 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014S 4.2 diesel V8 | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.1 s | 5.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.4 s | 5.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.1 s | 21.5 s |
| Top speed | 252 km/h 157 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.4 s | 11.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.6 s | 13.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 168 km/h 104 mph | 167 km/h 104 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014S 4.2 diesel V8 | 385 hp 287 kW |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 381 hp 284 kW |
Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 S 4.2 diesel V8 has 4 hp more than BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d and Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 S 4.2 diesel V8: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014S 4.2 diesel V8 | 850 Nm 627 lb-ft |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 740 Nm 546 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014S 4.2 diesel V8 | 2,215 kg 4,883 lb |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 2,225 kg 4,905 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014S 4.2 diesel V8 | 252 km/h 157 mph |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 250 km/h 155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014S 4.2 diesel V8 | 5.4 s |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 5.4 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014S 4.2 diesel V8 | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d and Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 S 4.2 diesel V8: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014S 4.2 diesel V8 | 174 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014S 4.2 diesel V8 | 1,063 km 660 mi |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 1,133 km 704 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014S 4.2 diesel V8 | 385 hp 287 kW | 5.4 s | 252 km/h 157 mph |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 381 hp 284 kW | 5.4 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014S 4.2 diesel V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014S 4.2 diesel V8 |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014S 4.2 diesel V8 | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 5.4 s |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 5.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014S 4.2 diesel V8 | 174 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014S 4.2 diesel V8 | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 385 hp 287 kW | 381 hp 284 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 850 Nm 627 lb-ft | 740 Nm 546 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.4 s | 5.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 252 km/h 157 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,215 kg 4,883 lb | 2,225 kg 4,905 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,063 km 660 mi | 1,133 km 704 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 209 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 670 L 23.7 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 174 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 S 4.2 diesel V8 | BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.00 LC100 km | 13.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,100 LC/year | 1,969 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 S 4.2 diesel V8
- Has 4 hp more
- Has 110 Nm more
- Is 10 kg lighter
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 71 km (44 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























