BMW X5 (E70 LCI) · Facelift 2010
Car comparison
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) · Facelift 2010 35ivsBMW X5 (G05) 30d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X5 (G05)
30d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X5 (G05) 30d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Highest torque620 Nm457 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions179 g/km
- Best estimated range1,176 km731 mi
- Largest trunk645 L
- Best performance score61/100
- Best economy score89/100
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Most powerful306 hp228 kW
- Lightest2,070 kg4,564 lb
- Best power-to-weight148 hp/t110 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Best overall score68/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | BMWX5 (G05)30d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 306hp228kW | 265hp198kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 620Nm457lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,070kg4,564lb | 2,110kg4,652lb |
| Gross weight | 2,750kg6,063lb | 2,860kg6,305lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 86.7s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 98.5s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.8s | 6.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.0s Calculated | 34.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 6.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 14.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 193Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated | 294Nm/t197lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 842km523mi Calculated | 1,176km731mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,979cc182cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,857mm191in | 4,922mm194in |
| Width | 1,933mm76in | 2,004mm79in |
| Height | 1,776mm70in | 1,745mm69in |
| Wheelbase | 2,933mm115in | 2,975mm117in |
| Front track | 1,644mm65in | 1,666mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,650mm65in | 1,685mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 222mm9in | 214mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 620L | 645L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,750L | 1,860L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 80L |
| CO2 emissions | 236g/km | 179g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i: Power / Torque
- BMW X5 (G05) 30d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 5,800 rpm | 1,200-5,000 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
| BMWX5 (G05)30d | 4,000 rpm | 2,000-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | BMWX5 (G05)30d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 6.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.8 s | 6.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.0 s | 34.1 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 14.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 96 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 306 hp 228 kW |
| BMWX5 (G05)30d | 265 hp 198 kW |
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i has 41 hp more than BMW X5 (G05) 30d.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X5 (G05) 30d and BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i: 41 hp (31 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| BMWX5 (G05)30d | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 2,070 kg 4,564 lb |
| BMWX5 (G05)30d | 2,110 kg 4,652 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| BMWX5 (G05)30d | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 6.8 s |
| BMWX5 (G05)30d | 6.5 s |
Although BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i has more power, BMW X5 (G05) 30d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X5 (G05) 30d and BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (G05)30d | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X5 (G05) 30d and BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i: 3.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| BMWX5 (G05)30d | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 842 km 523 mi |
| BMWX5 (G05)30d | 1,176 km 731 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 306 hp 228 kW | 6.8 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| BMWX5 (G05)30d | 265 hp 198 kW | 6.5 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX5 (G05)30d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i |
| 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX5 (G05)30d |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X5 (G05) 30d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
| BMWX5 (G05)30d | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (G05)30d | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | BMWX5 (G05)30d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 306 hp 228 kW | 265 hp 198 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.8 s | 6.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,070 kg 4,564 lb | 2,110 kg 4,652 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 842 km 523 mi | 1,176 km 731 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 236 g/km | 179 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 620 L 21.9 cu ft | 645 L 22.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i | BMW X5 (G05) 30d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.68 LC100 km | 11.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.45 LC100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,515 L400 US gal333 UK gal | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,651 LC/year | 1,785 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i
- Has 41 hp more
- Is 40 kg lighter
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 22 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
BMW X5 (G05) 30d
- Has 220 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 3.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 335 km (208 mi) more estimated range
- Has 25 L more trunk volume
- Emits 57 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























