BMW X5 (E70 LCI) · Facelift 2010
Car comparison
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) · Facelift 2010 35ivsBMW X5 (F15) 35d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X5 (F15)
35d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Most powerful306 hp228 kW
- Lightest2,070 kg4,564 lb
- Best power-to-weight148 hp/t110 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score57/100
- Best practicality score90/100
BMW X5 (F15) 35d
- Highest torque560 Nm413 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.4 L/100 km25.0 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.1 L/100 km29.0 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range904 km562 mi
- Largest trunk650 L
- Best economy score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | BMWX5 (F15)35d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 306hp228kW | 255hp190kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 560Nm413lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,070kg4,564lb | 2,236kg4,930lb |
| Gross weight | 2,750kg6,063lb | 2,903kg6,400lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 86.7s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 101.4s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.8s | 6.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.0s Calculated | 42.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 6.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 193Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated | 250Nm/t168lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 842km523mi Calculated | 904km562mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,979cc182cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,857mm191in | 4,908mm193in |
| Width | 1,933mm76in | 1,938mm76in |
| Height | 1,776mm70in | 1,762mm69in |
| Wheelbase | 2,933mm115in | 2,933mm115in |
| Front track | 1,644mm65in | 1,644mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,650mm65in | 1,650mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 222mm9in | 209mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 620L | 650L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,750L | 1,870L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 85L |
| CO2 emissions | 236g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i: Power / Torque
- BMW X5 (F15) 35d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 5,800 rpm | 1,200-5,000 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
| BMWX5 (F15)35d | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | BMWX5 (F15)35d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 6.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.8 s | 6.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.0 s | 42.5 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 96 mph | 146 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 306 hp 228 kW |
| BMWX5 (F15)35d | 255 hp 190 kW |
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i has 51 hp more than BMW X5 (F15) 35d.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X5 (F15) 35d and BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i: 51 hp (38 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| BMWX5 (F15)35d | 560 Nm 413 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 2,070 kg 4,564 lb |
| BMWX5 (F15)35d | 2,236 kg 4,930 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| BMWX5 (F15)35d | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 6.8 s |
| BMWX5 (F15)35d | 6.8 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (F15)35d | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X5 (F15) 35d and BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| BMWX5 (F15)35d | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 842 km 523 mi |
| BMWX5 (F15)35d | 904 km 562 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 306 hp 228 kW | 6.8 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| BMWX5 (F15)35d | 255 hp 190 kW | 6.8 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX5 (F15)35d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i |
| 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX5 (F15)35d |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
| BMWX5 (F15)35d | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (F15)35d | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | BMWX5 (F15)35d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 306 hp 228 kW | 255 hp 190 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 560 Nm 413 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.8 s | 6.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,070 kg 4,564 lb | 2,236 kg 4,930 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 842 km 523 mi | 904 km 562 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 236 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 620 L 21.9 cu ft | 650 L 23.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i | BMW X5 (F15) 35d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.68 LC100 km | 16.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.45 LC100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,515 L400 US gal333 UK gal | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,651 LC/year | 2,468 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i
- Has 51 hp more
- Is 166 kg lighter
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 34 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
BMW X5 (F15) 35d
- Has 160 Nm more
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 63 km (39 mi) more estimated range
- Has 30 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























