BMW X5 (E70 LCI) · Facelift 2010
Car comparison
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) · Facelift 2010 35ivsBMW X5 (F15) 25d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X5 (F15)
25d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X5 (F15) 25d
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lightest2,040 kg4,497 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions148 g/km
- Best estimated range1,518 km943 mi
- Largest trunk650 L
- Best economy score92/100
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Most powerful306 hp228 kW
- Best power-to-weight148 hp/t110 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score57/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | BMWX5 (F15)25d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 306hp228kW | 231hp172kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,070kg4,564lb | 2,040kg4,497lb |
| Gross weight | 2,750kg6,063lb | 2,755kg6,074lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 86.7s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 108.0s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.8s | 7.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.0s Calculated | 46.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 113hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 193Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated | 245Nm/t164lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 842km523mi Calculated | 1,518km943mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,979cc182cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,857mm191in | 4,886mm192in |
| Width | 1,933mm76in | 1,938mm76in |
| Height | 1,776mm70in | 1,762mm69in |
| Wheelbase | 2,933mm115in | 2,933mm115in |
| Front track | 1,644mm65in | 1,644mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,650mm65in | 1,650mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 222mm9in | 209mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 620L | 650L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,750L | 1,870L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 85L |
| CO2 emissions | 236g/km | 148g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i: Power / Torque
- BMW X5 (F15) 25d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 5,800 rpm | 1,200-5,000 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
| BMWX5 (F15)25d | 4,400 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | BMWX5 (F15)25d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.8 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.0 s | 46.2 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 96 mph | 142 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 306 hp 228 kW |
| BMWX5 (F15)25d | 231 hp 172 kW |
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i has 75 hp more than BMW X5 (F15) 25d.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X5 (F15) 25d and BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i: 75 hp (56 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| BMWX5 (F15)25d | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 2,070 kg 4,564 lb |
| BMWX5 (F15)25d | 2,040 kg 4,497 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| BMWX5 (F15)25d | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 6.8 s |
| BMWX5 (F15)25d | 7.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i and BMW X5 (F15) 25d: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (F15)25d | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X5 (F15) 25d and BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i: 4.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| BMWX5 (F15)25d | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 842 km 523 mi |
| BMWX5 (F15)25d | 1,518 km 943 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 306 hp 228 kW | 6.8 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| BMWX5 (F15)25d | 231 hp 172 kW | 7.7 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX5 (F15)25d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i |
| 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX5 (F15)25d |
| 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
| BMWX5 (F15)25d | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (F15)25d | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | BMWX5 (F15)25d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 306 hp 228 kW | 231 hp 172 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.8 s | 7.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,070 kg 4,564 lb | 2,040 kg 4,497 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 842 km 523 mi | 1,518 km 943 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 236 g/km | 148 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 620 L 21.9 cu ft | 650 L 23.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i | BMW X5 (F15) 25d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.68 LC100 km | 9.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.45 LC100 mi | 15.77 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,515 L400 US gal333 UK gal | 840 L222 US gal185 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,651 LC/year | 1,470 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i
- Has 75 hp more
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 35 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
BMW X5 (F15) 25d
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 30 kg lighter
- Uses 4.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 676 km (420 mi) more estimated range
- Has 30 L more trunk volume
- Emits 88 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























