BMW X3 (F25 LCI) · Facelift 2014
Car comparison
BMW X3 (F25 LCI) · Facelift 2014 35ivsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 T6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC60 II
2.0 T6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 35i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.6 s
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,815 kg4,001 lb
- Best power-to-weight169 hp/t126 kW/t5.9 kg/hp
- Largest trunk550 L
- Best overall score70/100
- Best performance score62/100
- Best practicality score86/100
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6
- Most powerful310 hp231 kW
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions181 g/km
- Best estimated range910 km566 mi
- Best economy score86/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435i | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 306hp228kW | 310hp231kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,815kg4,001lb | 1,941kg4,279lb |
| Gross weight | 2,405kg5,302lb | 2,450kg5,401lb |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 70.0s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 70.3s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.6s | 5.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.9s Calculated | 23.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.3s Calculated | 5.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.8s Calculated | 14.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 169hp/t126kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated | 160hp/t119kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 220Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated | 206Nm/t138lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 807km502mi Calculated | 910km566mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,979cc182cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,657mm183in | 4,688mm185in |
| Width | 1,881mm74in | 1,902mm75in |
| Height | 1,661mm65in | 1,658mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,810mm111in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | 1,594mm63in | 1,668mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,610mm63in | 1,673mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 204mm8in | 216mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 550L | 505L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,600L | 1,432L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 67L | 71L |
| CO2 emissions | 193g/km | 181g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 35i: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435i | 5,800-6,400 rpm | 1,200-5,000 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 5,700 rpm | 2,200-5,100 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435i | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.3 s | 5.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.6 s | 5.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.9 s | 23.6 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.0 s | 9.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.6 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.8 s | 14.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 166 km/h 103 mph | 163 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435i | 306 hp 228 kW |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 310 hp 231 kW |
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 has 4 hp more than BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 35i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 35i and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435i | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435i | 1,815 kg 4,001 lb |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 1,941 kg 4,279 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435i | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435i | 5.6 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 5.9 s |
Although Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 has more power, BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 35i is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 35i and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435i | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 and BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 35i: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435i | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435i | 807 km 502 mi |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 910 km 566 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435i | 306 hp 228 kW | 5.6 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 310 hp 231 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435i |
| 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 35i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435i | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 5.6 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435i | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435i | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 306 hp 228 kW | 310 hp 231 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.6 s | 5.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,815 kg 4,001 lb | 1,941 kg 4,279 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 807 km 502 mi | 910 km 566 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 193 g/km | 181 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 35i | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.53 LC100 km | 13.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.38 LC100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,179 LC/year | 2,048 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 35i
- Is 126 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 45 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6
- Has 4 hp more
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 103 km (64 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 12 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























