BMW X3 (F25 LCI) · Facelift 2014
Car comparison
BMW X3 (F25 LCI) · Facelift 2014 35ivsBMW X3 (E83) 3.0i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X3 (E83)
3.0i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 35i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.6 s
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph
- Most powerful306 hp228 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,815 kg4,001 lb
- Best power-to-weight169 hp/t126 kW/t5.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34.0 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.7 L/100 km22.0 mpg US26.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range807 km502 mi
- Largest trunk550 L
- Best overall score70/100
- Best performance score62/100
- Best economy score85/100
- Best practicality score86/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435i | BMWX3 (E83)3.0i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 306hp228kW | 231hp172kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,815kg4,001lb | 1,835kg4,045lb |
| Gross weight | 2,405kg5,302lb | 2,260kg4,982lb |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 69.9s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 91.0s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.6s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.9s Calculated | 38.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.3s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK | 16L/100 km14.7mpg US17.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.8s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 169hp/t126kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated | 126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 220Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated | 163Nm/t109lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 807km502mi Calculated | 588km365mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,979cc182cu in | 2,979cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,657mm183in | 4,569mm180in |
| Width | 1,881mm74in | 1,853mm73in |
| Height | 1,661mm65in | 1,674mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,810mm111in | 2,795mm110in |
| Front track | 1,594mm63in | 1,524mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,610mm63in | 1,542mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 204mm8in | 200mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 550L | 500L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,600L | 1,560L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 67L | 67L |
| CO2 emissions | 193g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 35i: Power / Torque
- BMW X3 (E83) 3.0i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435i | 5,800-6,400 rpm | 1,200-5,000 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
| BMWX3 (E83)3.0i | 5,900 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,150 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435i | BMWX3 (E83)3.0i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.3 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.6 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.9 s | 38.3 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.0 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.6 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.8 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 167 km/h 103 mph | 146 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435i | 306 hp 228 kW |
| BMWX3 (E83)3.0i | 231 hp 172 kW |
BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 35i has 75 hp more than BMW X3 (E83) 3.0i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X3 (E83) 3.0i and BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 35i: 75 hp (56 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435i | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| BMWX3 (E83)3.0i | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435i | 1,815 kg 4,001 lb |
| BMWX3 (E83)3.0i | 1,835 kg 4,045 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435i | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| BMWX3 (E83)3.0i | 224 km/h 139 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435i | 5.6 s |
| BMWX3 (E83)3.0i | 7.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 35i and BMW X3 (E83) 3.0i: 2.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435i | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
| BMWX3 (E83)3.0i | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 35i and BMW X3 (E83) 3.0i: 3.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435i | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
| BMWX3 (E83)3.0i | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435i | 807 km 502 mi |
| BMWX3 (E83)3.0i | 588 km 365 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435i | 306 hp 228 kW | 5.6 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| BMWX3 (E83)3.0i | 231 hp 172 kW | 7.8 s | 224 km/h 139 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX3 (E83)3.0i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435i |
| 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX3 (E83)3.0i |
| 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 35i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435i | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 5.6 s |
| BMWX3 (E83)3.0i | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435i | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
| BMWX3 (E83)3.0i | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435i | BMWX3 (E83)3.0i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 306 hp 228 kW | 231 hp 172 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.6 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,815 kg 4,001 lb | 1,835 kg 4,045 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 807 km 502 mi | 588 km 365 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 193 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 35i | BMW X3 (E83) 3.0i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK | 11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.53 LC100 km | 19.95 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.38 LC100 mi | 32.11 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal | 1,710 L452 US gal376 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,179 LC/year | 2,993 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 35i
- Has 75 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 20 kg lighter
- Is 2.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 21 km/h (13 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 3.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 43 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 220 km (136 mi) more estimated range
- Has 50 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
BMW X3 (E83) 3.0i
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























