BMW X5 (E70 LCI) · Facelift 2010
Car comparison
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) · Facelift 2010 35ivsBMW X3 (E83) · Facelift 2006 3.0si
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X3 (E83) · Facelift 2006
3.0si
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Most powerful306 hp228 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28.0 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.2 L/100 km17.8 mpg US21.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions236 g/km
- Best estimated range842 km523 mi
- Largest trunk620 L
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score57/100
- Best economy score80/100
- Best practicality score90/100
BMW X3 (E83) Facelift 2006 3.0si
- Lightest1,740 kg3,836 lb
- Best power-to-weight156 hp/t117 kW/t6.4 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0si |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 306hp228kW | 272hp203kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 315Nm232lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,070kg4,564lb | 1,740kg3,836lb |
| Gross weight | 2,750kg6,063lb | 2,260kg4,982lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 86.7s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 77.1s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.8s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.0s Calculated | 36.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK | 14.2L/100 km16.6mpg US19.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 156hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 193Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated | 181Nm/t121lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 842km523mi Calculated | 663km412mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,979cc182cu in | 2,996cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,857mm191in | 4,569mm180in |
| Width | 1,933mm76in | 1,853mm73in |
| Height | 1,776mm70in | 1,674mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,933mm115in | 2,795mm110in |
| Front track | 1,644mm65in | 1,524mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,650mm65in | 1,542mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 222mm9in | 201mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 620L | 480L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,750L | 1,560L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 67L |
| CO2 emissions | 236g/km | 243g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i: Power / Torque
- BMW X3 (E83) Facelift 2006 3.0si: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 5,800 rpm | 1,200-5,000 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0si | 6,650 rpm | 2,750 rpm | 6,900 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0si |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.8 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.0 s | 36.0 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 96 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 306 hp 228 kW |
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0si | 272 hp 203 kW |
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i has 34 hp more than BMW X3 (E83) Facelift 2006 3.0si.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X3 (E83) Facelift 2006 3.0si and BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i: 34 hp (25 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0si | 315 Nm 232 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 2,070 kg 4,564 lb |
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0si | 1,740 kg 3,836 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0si | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 6.8 s |
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0si | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i and BMW X3 (E83) Facelift 2006 3.0si: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0si | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0si | 156 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 842 km 523 mi |
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0si | 663 km 412 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 306 hp 228 kW | 6.8 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0si | 272 hp 203 kW | 7.2 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0si |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i |
| 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0si |
| 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0si | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0si | 156 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0si | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 306 hp 228 kW | 272 hp 203 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 315 Nm 232 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.8 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,070 kg 4,564 lb | 1,740 kg 3,836 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 842 km 523 mi | 663 km 412 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 236 g/km | 243 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 620 L 21.9 cu ft | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 156 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i | BMW X3 (E83) Facelift 2006 3.0si |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28 mpg UK | 10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.68 LC100 km | 17.68 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.45 LC100 mi | 28.45 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,515 L400 US gal333 UK gal | 1,515 L400 US gal333 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,651 LC/year | 2,651 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i
- Has 34 hp more
- Has 85 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 178 km (111 mi) more estimated range
- Has 140 L more trunk volume
- Emits 7 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
BMW X3 (E83) Facelift 2006 3.0si
- Is 330 kg lighter
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























