BMW X5 (E70 LCI) · Facelift 2010
Car comparison
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) · Facelift 2010 35ivsBMW X3 (E83) · Facelift 2006 30i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X3 (E83) · Facelift 2006
30i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Most powerful306 hp228 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption13.2 L/100 km17.8 mpg US21.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range842 km523 mi
- Largest trunk620 L
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score57/100
- Best practicality score90/100
BMW X3 (E83) Facelift 2006 30i
- Lightest1,740 kg3,836 lb
- Best power-to-weight156 hp/t117 kW/t6.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions233 g/km
- Best economy score81/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200630i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 306hp228kW | 272hp203kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 315Nm232lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,070kg4,564lb | 1,740kg3,836lb |
| Gross weight | 2,750kg6,063lb | 2,300kg5,071lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 86.7s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 86.0s99% target: 230 km/h / 143 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.8s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.0s Calculated | 32.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK | 13.3L/100 km17.7mpg US21.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 156hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 193Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated | 181Nm/t121lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 842km523mi Calculated | 691km429mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,979cc182cu in | 2,996cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,857mm191in | 4,569mm180in |
| Width | 1,933mm76in | 1,853mm73in |
| Height | 1,776mm70in | 1,674mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,933mm115in | 2,795mm110in |
| Front track | 1,644mm65in | 1,524mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,650mm65in | 1,542mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 222mm9in | 201mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 620L | 480L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,750L | 1,560L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 67L |
| CO2 emissions | 236g/km | 233g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i: Power / Torque
- BMW X3 (E83) Facelift 2006 30i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 5,800 rpm | 1,200-5,000 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200630i | 6,650 rpm | 2,750 rpm | 6,900 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200630i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.8 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.0 s | 32.3 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 96 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 306 hp 228 kW |
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200630i | 272 hp 203 kW |
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i has 34 hp more than BMW X3 (E83) Facelift 2006 30i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X3 (E83) Facelift 2006 30i and BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i: 34 hp (25 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200630i | 315 Nm 232 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 2,070 kg 4,564 lb |
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200630i | 1,740 kg 3,836 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200630i | 232 km/h 144 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 6.8 s |
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200630i | 7.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i and BMW X3 (E83) Facelift 2006 30i: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200630i | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200630i | 156 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 842 km 523 mi |
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200630i | 691 km 429 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 306 hp 228 kW | 6.8 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200630i | 272 hp 203 kW | 7.5 s | 232 km/h 144 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200630i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i |
| 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200630i |
| 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200630i | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200630i | 156 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200630i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 306 hp 228 kW | 272 hp 203 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 315 Nm 232 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.8 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 232 km/h 144 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,070 kg 4,564 lb | 1,740 kg 3,836 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 842 km 523 mi | 691 km 429 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 236 g/km | 233 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 620 L 21.9 cu ft | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 156 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i | BMW X3 (E83) Facelift 2006 30i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28 mpg UK | 9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.68 LC100 km | 16.97 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.45 LC100 mi | 27.32 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,515 L400 US gal333 UK gal | 1,455 L384 US gal320 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,651 LC/year | 2,546 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i
- Has 34 hp more
- Has 85 Nm more
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 151 km (94 mi) more estimated range
- Has 140 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
BMW X3 (E83) Facelift 2006 30i
- Is 330 kg lighter
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 3 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























