Seat Altea Freetrack
Car comparison
Seat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSIvsBMW X3 (E83) 3.0d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X3 (E83)
3.0d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X3 (E83) 3.0d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Most powerful218 hp163 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.3 L/100 km22.8 mpg US27.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range848 km527 mi
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Seat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSI
- Fastest top speed214 km/h133 mph
- Lightest1,571 kg3,463 lb
- Best power-to-weight127 hp/t95 kW/t7.9 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI | BMWX3 (E83)3.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 218hp163kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,571kg3,463lb | 1,880kg4,145lb |
| Gross weight | 2,191kg4,830lb | 2,350kg5,181lb |
| Top speed | 214 km/h 133 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.3s99% target: 212 km/h / 132 mph Calculated | 79.4s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 42.2s Calculated | 48.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.8L/100 km18.4mpg US22.1mpg UK | 10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 127hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated | 116hp/t86kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 178Nm/t119lb-ft/ton Calculated | 266Nm/t178lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 638km397mi Calculated | 848km527mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,493mm177in | 4,569mm180in |
| Width | 1,788mm70in | 1,853mm73in |
| Height | 1,622mm64in | 1,674mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,576mm101in | 2,795mm110in |
| Front track | 1,542mm61in | 1,524mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,527mm60in | 1,542mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 200mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 490L | 500L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,560L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 67L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Seat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSI: Power / Torque
- BMW X3 (E83) 3.0d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI | 5,700 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
| BMWX3 (E83)3.0d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI | BMWX3 (E83)3.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 42.2 s | 48.2 s |
| Top speed | 214 km/h 133 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 147 km/h 91 mph | 146 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
| BMWX3 (E83)3.0d | 218 hp 163 kW |
BMW X3 (E83) 3.0d has 18 hp more than Seat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSI and BMW X3 (E83) 3.0d: 18 hp (13 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| BMWX3 (E83)3.0d | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI | 1,571 kg 3,463 lb |
| BMWX3 (E83)3.0d | 1,880 kg 4,145 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI | 214 km/h 133 mph |
| BMWX3 (E83)3.0d | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI | 7.5 s |
| BMWX3 (E83)3.0d | 7.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X3 (E83) 3.0d and Seat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| BMWX3 (E83)3.0d | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X3 (E83) 3.0d and Seat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSI: 1.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
| BMWX3 (E83)3.0d | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI | 638 km 397 mi |
| BMWX3 (E83)3.0d | 848 km 527 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.5 s | 214 km/h 133 mph |
| BMWX3 (E83)3.0d | 218 hp 163 kW | 7.4 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX3 (E83)3.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX3 (E83)3.0d |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X3 (E83) 3.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
| BMWX3 (E83)3.0d | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| BMWX3 (E83)3.0d | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI | BMWX3 (E83)3.0d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 218 hp 163 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 214 km/h 133 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,571 kg 3,463 lb | 1,880 kg 4,145 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 638 km 397 mi | 848 km 527 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 490 L 17.3 cu ft | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Seat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSI | BMW X3 (E83) 3.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.45 LC100 km | 13.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,468 LC/year | 2,074 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Seat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSI
- Is 309 kg lighter
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
BMW X3 (E83) 3.0d
- Has 18 hp more
- Has 220 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 210 km (130 mi) more estimated range
- Has 10 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























