Car comparison

Seat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSIvsBMW X3 (E83) 3.0d

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Seat Altea Freetrack

2.0 FSI

200 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedSUV2007-2009
VS

BMW X3 (E83)

3.0d

218 hp2993 ccDieselAWDManualTurbochargedSUV2004-2006

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW X3 (E83) 3.0d

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.4 s
  • Most powerful
    218 hp
    163 kW
  • Highest torque
    500 Nm
    369 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.9 L/100 km
    29.8 mpg US
    35.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    10.3 L/100 km
    22.8 mpg US
    27.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.5 L/100 km
    36.2 mpg US
    43.5 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    848 km
    527 mi
  • Largest trunk
    500 L
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best performance score
    52/100
  • Best economy score
    86/100
  • Best practicality score
    84/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSIBMWX3 (E83)3.0d
Power
200hp149kW
218hp163kW
Torque
280Nm207lb-ft
500Nm369lb-ft
Curb weight
1,571kg3,463lb
1,880kg4,145lb
Gross weight
2,191kg4,830lb
2,350kg5,181lb
Top speed
214 km/h
133 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
To 99% top speed
78.3s99% target: 212 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
79.4s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.5s
7.4s
0-200 km/h
42.2s
Calculated
48.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.1s
Calculated
7.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK
7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
12.8L/100 km18.4mpg US22.1mpg UK
10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.5s
Calculated
15.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
127hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
116hp/t86kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
178Nm/t119lb-ft/ton
Calculated
266Nm/t178lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
638km397mi
Calculated
848km527mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
2,993cc183cu in
Length
4,493mm177in
4,569mm180in
Width
1,788mm70in
1,853mm73in
Height
1,622mm64in
1,674mm66in
Wheelbase
2,576mm101in
2,795mm110in
Front track
1,542mm61in
1,524mm60in
Rear track
1,527mm60in
1,542mm61in
Ground clearance-
200mm8in
Trunk volume
490L
500L
Max trunk volume-
1,560L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
67L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Seat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSIBMW X3 (E83) 3.0dPowerTorque
  • Seat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSI: Power / Torque
  • BMW X3 (E83) 3.0d: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI5,700 rpm3,500 rpm5,950 rpm
BMWX3 (E83)3.0d4,000 rpm1,750 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSIBMWX3 (E83)3.0d
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.1 s
7.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.5 s
7.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
42.2 s
48.2 s
Top speed
214 km/h
133 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.0 s
12.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.5 s
15.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
147 km/h
91 mph
146 km/h
91 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI
200 hp
149 kW
BMWX3 (E83)3.0d
218 hp
163 kW

BMW X3 (E83) 3.0d has 18 hp more than Seat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSI.

The biggest power difference is between Seat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSI and BMW X3 (E83) 3.0d: 18 hp (13 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
BMWX3 (E83)3.0d
500 Nm
369 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI
1,571 kg
3,463 lb
BMWX3 (E83)3.0d
1,880 kg
4,145 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI
214 km/h
133 mph
BMWX3 (E83)3.0d
210 km/h
130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI7.5 s
BMWX3 (E83)3.0d7.4 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X3 (E83) 3.0d and Seat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSI: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
BMWX3 (E83)3.0d
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X3 (E83) 3.0d and Seat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSI: 1.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI
127 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
BMWX3 (E83)3.0d
116 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI
638 km
397 mi
BMWX3 (E83)3.0d
848 km
527 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI
200 hp
149 kW
7.5 s
214 km/h
133 mph
BMWX3 (E83)3.0d
218 hp
163 kW
7.4 s
210 km/h
130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
214 km/h
133 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
490 L
17.3 cu ft
Length
4,493 mm
176.9 in
Height
1,622 mm
63.9 in
BMWX3 (E83)3.0d
Power
218 hp
163 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,569 mm
179.9 in
Height
1,674 mm
65.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
214 km/h
133 mph
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
BMWX3 (E83)3.0d
Power
218 hp
163 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK

BMW X3 (E83) 3.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
7.5 s
BMWX3 (E83)3.0d
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
7.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI
127 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
BMWX3 (E83)3.0d
116 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSIBMWX3 (E83)3.0d
Power
200 hp
149 kW
218 hp
163 kW
Torque
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.5 s
7.4 s
Top speed
214 km/h
133 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
Lightness
1,571 kg
3,463 lb
1,880 kg
4,145 lb
Fuel consumption
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
490 L
17.3 cu ft
Length
4,493 mm
176.9 in
Height
1,622 mm
63.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,569 mm
179.9 in
Height
1,674 mm
65.9 in
Range score
638 km
397 mi
848 km
527 mi
Trunk score
490 L
17.3 cu ft
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
127 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
116 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSeat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSIBMW X3 (E83) 3.0d
Consumption9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km16.45 LC100 km13.83 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi26.47 LC100 mi22.25 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,468 LC/year2,074 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Seat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSI

  • Is 309 kg lighter
  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

BMW X3 (E83) 3.0d

  • Has 18 hp more
  • Has 220 Nm more
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 210 km (130 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 10 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Seat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSI
BMW X3 (E83) 3.0d
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Seat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSI vs BMW X3 (E83) 3.0d - car comparison - FastVsFaster