BMW X2 (F39)
Car comparison
BMW X2 (F39) 25dvsVolvo XC40 2.0 T5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC40
2.0 T5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X2 (F39) 25d
- Fastest top speed237 km/h147 mph
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lightest1,585 kg3,494 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range962 km598 mi
- Largest trunk470 L
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score58/100
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Volvo XC40 2.0 T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Most powerful247 hp184 kW
- Best power-to-weight147 hp/t110 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX2 (F39)25d | VolvoXC402.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231hp172kW | 247hp184kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,585kg3,494lb | 1,680kg3,704lb |
| Gross weight | 2,180kg4,806lb | 2,220kg4,894lb |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.7s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 74.3s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 6.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.9s Calculated | 28.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 284Nm/t190lb-ft/ton Calculated | 208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 962km598mi Calculated | 750km466mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,360mm172in | 4,425mm174in |
| Width | 1,824mm72in | 1,863mm73in |
| Height | 1,526mm60in | 1,652mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,702mm106in |
| Front track | 1,563mm62in | 1,601mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,562mm61in | 1,626mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 182mm7in | 211mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 470L | 460L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,355L | 1,336L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 54L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 164g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X2 (F39) 25d: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC40 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 4,400 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,800 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX2 (F39)25d | VolvoXC402.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 6.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.9 s | 28.7 s |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 157 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 231 hp 172 kW |
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 247 hp 184 kW |
Volvo XC40 2.0 T5 has 16 hp more than BMW X2 (F39) 25d.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 25d and Volvo XC40 2.0 T5: 16 hp (12 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb |
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 1,680 kg 3,704 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 6.7 s |
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 6.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC40 2.0 T5 and BMW X2 (F39) 25d: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 25d and Volvo XC40 2.0 T5: 1.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 962 km 598 mi |
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 750 km 466 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 231 hp 172 kW | 6.7 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 247 hp 184 kW | 6.5 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d |
| 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X2 (F39) 25d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX2 (F39)25d | VolvoXC402.0 T5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp 172 kW | 247 hp 184 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 6.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb | 1,680 kg 3,704 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 962 km 598 mi | 750 km 466 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 164 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X2 (F39) 25d | Volvo XC40 2.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.28 LC100 km | 12.60 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.93 LC100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 795 L210 US gal175 UK gal | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,391 LC/year | 1,890 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X2 (F39) 25d
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 95 kg lighter
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 212 km (132 mi) more estimated range
- Has 10 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Volvo XC40 2.0 T5
- Has 16 hp more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























