Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II)
Car comparison
Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTechvsBMW X2 (F39) 20d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X2 (F39)
20d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X2 (F39) 20d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.7 s
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,063 km660 mi
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score94/100
Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech
- Fastest top speed222 km/h138 mph
- Lightest1,429 kg3,150 lb
- Best power-to-weight127 hp/t94 kW/t7.9 kg/hp
- Largest trunk520 L
- Best practicality score84/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | BMWX2 (F39)20d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 181hp135kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,429kg3,150lb | 1,600kg3,527lb |
| Gross weight | 1,970kg4,343lb | 2,190kg4,828lb |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 221 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 84.1s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated | 76.2s99% target: 219 km/h / 136 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.0s | 7.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 38.0s Calculated | 35.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.6s Calculated | 7.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.8s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 127hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated | 119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 175Nm/t117lb-ft/ton Calculated | 250Nm/t167lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 679km422mi Calculated | 1,063km660mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,598cc98cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,447mm175in | 4,360mm172in |
| Width | 1,841mm72in | 1,824mm72in |
| Height | 1,624mm64in | 1,526mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,675mm105in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | 1,601mm63in | 1,563mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,610mm63in | 1,562mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 219mm9in | 182mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 520L | 470L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,482L | 1,355L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 53L | 51L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech: Power / Torque
- BMW X2 (F39) 20d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 5,500 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | BMWX2 (F39)20d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.6 s | 7.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.0 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 38.0 s | 35.8 s |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 221 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.3 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.8 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 147 km/h 91 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 181 hp 135 kW |
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 190 hp 142 kW |
BMW X2 (F39) 20d has 9 hp more than Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech.
The biggest power difference is between Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech and BMW X2 (F39) 20d: 9 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 1,429 kg 3,150 lb |
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 221 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 8.0 s |
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 7.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 20d and Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 20d and Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech: 3.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 127 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 679 km 422 mi |
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 1,063 km 660 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 181 hp 135 kW | 8.0 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.7 s | 221 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX2 (F39)20d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX2 (F39)20d |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X2 (F39) 20d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 127 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | BMWX2 (F39)20d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 181 hp 135 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.0 s | 7.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 221 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,429 kg 3,150 lb | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 679 km 422 mi | 1,063 km 660 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 127 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech | BMW X2 (F39) 20d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.65 LC100 km | 8.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,048 LC/year | 1,260 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech
- Is 171 kg lighter
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 50 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
BMW X2 (F39) 20d
- Has 9 hp more
- Has 150 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 3.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 383 km (238 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























