BMW X1 (F48)
Car comparison
BMW X1 (F48) 20ivsSeat Tarraco 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSeat Tarraco
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Seat Tarraco 2.0 TDI
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions147 g/km
- Best estimated range1,071 km666 mi
- Largest trunk760 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best economy score92/100
- Best practicality score92/100
BMW X1 (F48) 20i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.9 s
- Fastest top speed223 km/h139 mph
- Most powerful192 hp143 kW
- Lightest1,570 kg3,461 lb
- Best power-to-weight122 hp/t91 kW/t8.2 kg/hp
- Best performance score48/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX1 (F48)20i | SeatTarraco2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 192hp143kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,570kg3,461lb | 1,741kg3,838lb |
| Gross weight | 2,155kg4,751lb | 2,410kg5,313lb |
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 79.8s99% target: 221 km/h / 137 mph Calculated | 83.0s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.9s | 8.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.9s Calculated | 50.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.5s Calculated | 7.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated | 109hp/t81kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 178Nm/t119lb-ft/ton Calculated | 230Nm/t154lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 910km566mi Calculated | 1,071km666mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,439mm175in | 4,735mm186in |
| Width | 1,821mm72in | 1,839mm72in |
| Height | 1,598mm63in | 1,674mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,790mm110in |
| Front track | 1,561mm61in | 1,575mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,562mm61in | 1,564mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 183mm7in | - |
| Trunk volume | 505L | 760L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,550L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 61L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 152g/km | 147g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X1 (F48) 20i: Power / Torque
- Seat Tarraco 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,350-4,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX1 (F48)20i | SeatTarraco2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.5 s | 7.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.9 s | 8.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.9 s | 50.7 s |
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.3 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 192 hp 143 kW |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
BMW X1 (F48) 20i has 2 hp more than Seat Tarraco 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Tarraco 2.0 TDI and BMW X1 (F48) 20i: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | 1,741 kg 3,838 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 7.9 s |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | 8.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X1 (F48) 20i and Seat Tarraco 2.0 TDI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Seat Tarraco 2.0 TDI and BMW X1 (F48) 20i: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 910 km 566 mi |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | 1,071 km 666 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 192 hp 143 kW | 7.9 s | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.0 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI |
| 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Seat Tarraco 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX1 (F48)20i | SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 192 hp 143 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.9 s | 8.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | 1,741 kg 3,838 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 910 km 566 mi | 1,071 km 666 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 152 g/km | 147 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 760 L 26.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X1 (F48) 20i | Seat Tarraco 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.73 LC100 km | 9.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi | 15.77 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal | 840 L222 US gal185 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,759 LC/year | 1,470 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X1 (F48) 20i
- Has 2 hp more
- Is 171 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
- Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Seat Tarraco 2.0 TDI
- Has 120 Nm more
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 161 km (100 mi) more estimated range
- Has 255 L more trunk volume
- Emits 5 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























