Car comparison

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0vsBMW X1 (F48) 20d

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mini Countryman (F60)

Cooper S 2.0

192 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2018
VS

BMW X1 (F48)

20d

190 hp1995 ccDieselFWDManualTurbochargedSUV2016-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW X1 (F48) 20d

  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.7 L/100 km
    50.0 mpg US
    60.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.5 L/100 km
    42.8 mpg US
    51.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.2 L/100 km
    56.0 mpg US
    67.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    123 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,085 km
    674 mi
  • Largest trunk
    505 L
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best performance score
    51/100
  • Best economy score
    94/100
  • Best practicality score
    84/100

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    225 km/h
    140 mph
  • Most powerful
    192 hp
    143 kW
  • Lightest
    1,460 kg
    3,219 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    132 hp/t
    98 kW/t
    7.6 kg/hp

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0BMWX1 (F48)20d
Power
192hp143kW
190hp142kW
Torque
280Nm207lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,460kg3,219lb
1,480kg3,263lb
Gross weight
2,050kg4,519lb
2,055kg4,530lb
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
To 99% top speed
78.4s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
80.6s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.4s
7.9s
0-200 km/h
33.6s
Calculated
35.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.0s
Calculated
7.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.3s
Calculated
15.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
128hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
192Nm/t128lb-ft/ton
Calculated
270Nm/t181lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
823km511mi
Calculated
1,085km674mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,995cc122cu in
Length
4,299mm169in
4,439mm175in
Width
1,822mm72in
1,821mm72in
Height
1,557mm61in
1,598mm63in
Wheelbase
2,670mm105in
2,670mm105in
Front track
1,563mm62in
1,561mm61in
Rear track
1,565mm62in
1,562mm61in
Ground clearance
165mm6in
183mm7in
Trunk volume
450L
505L
Max trunk volume
1,390L
1,550L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
51L
51L
CO2 emissions
141g/km
123g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0BMW X1 (F48) 20dPowerTorque
  • Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0: Power / Torque
  • BMW X1 (F48) 20d: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.05,000-6,000 rpm1,350-4,600 rpm6,250 rpm
BMWX1 (F48)20d4,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0BMWX1 (F48)20d
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.0 s
7.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.4 s
7.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
33.6 s
35.0 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
10.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.9 s
13.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.3 s
15.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
151 km/h
94 mph
149 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
192 hp
143 kW
BMWX1 (F48)20d
190 hp
142 kW

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0 has 2 hp more than BMW X1 (F48) 20d.

The biggest power difference is between BMW X1 (F48) 20d and Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0: 2 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
BMWX1 (F48)20d
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
1,460 kg
3,219 lb
BMWX1 (F48)20d
1,480 kg
3,263 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
225 km/h
140 mph
BMWX1 (F48)20d
225 km/h
140 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.07.4 s
BMWX1 (F48)20d7.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0 and BMW X1 (F48) 20d: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
BMWX1 (F48)20d
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X1 (F48) 20d and Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0: 1.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
BMWX1 (F48)20d
128 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
823 km
511 mi
BMWX1 (F48)20d
1,085 km
674 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
192 hp
143 kW
7.4 s
225 km/h
140 mph
BMWX1 (F48)20d
190 hp
142 kW
7.9 s
225 km/h
140 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,299 mm
169.3 in
Height
1,557 mm
61.3 in
BMWX1 (F48)20d
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,439 mm
174.8 in
Height
1,598 mm
62.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
BMWX1 (F48)20d
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK

BMW X1 (F48) 20d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
7.4 s
BMWX1 (F48)20d
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK
7.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
BMWX1 (F48)20d
128 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0BMWX1 (F48)20d
Power
192 hp
143 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.4 s
7.9 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
Lightness
1,460 kg
3,219 lb
1,480 kg
3,263 lb
Fuel consumption
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,299 mm
169.3 in
Height
1,557 mm
61.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,439 mm
174.8 in
Height
1,598 mm
62.9 in
Range score
823 km
511 mi
1,085 km
674 mi
CO2 score
141 g/km
123 g/km
Trunk score
450 L
15.9 cu ft
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
128 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0BMW X1 (F48) 20d
Consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.85 LC100 km8.23 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi17.46 LC100 mi13.24 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used930 L246 US gal205 UK gal705 L186 US gal155 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,628 LC/year1,234 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0

  • Has 2 hp more
  • Is 20 kg lighter
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

BMW X1 (F48) 20d

  • Has 120 Nm more
  • Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 263 km (163 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 55 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 18 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0
BMW X1 (F48) 20d
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6
20d
20i
VS
BMWX1 (F48)20dvsBMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i
Cooper S 2.0
Cooper SD 2.0
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper SD 2.0
20d
23d
VS
BMWX1 (F48)20dvsBMWX1 (E84)23d
Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniCountryman (R60)Cooper S 1.6
20d
23d
VS
BMWX1 (F48)20dvsBMWX1 (U11)23d
Cooper S 2.0
S 2.0
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0
20d
20i
VS
BMWX1 (F48)20dvsBMWX2 (F39)20i
20d
20d
VS
BMWX1 (F48)20dvsBMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201420d
Cooper S 2.0
2.0 TSI
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0vsVolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
20d
2.0 TDI
VS
BMWX1 (F48)20dvsAUDIQ22.0 TDI
20d
2.0 TDI
VS
BMWX1 (F48)20dvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0 vs BMW X1 (F48) 20d - car comparison - FastVsFaster