Car comparison

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0vsVolkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mini Countryman (F60)

Cooper S 2.0

192 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2018
VS

Volkswagen T-Roc I

2.0 TSI

190 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2017-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0

  • Fastest top speed
    225 km/h
    140 mph
  • Most powerful
    192 hp
    143 kW
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.2 L/100 km
    37.9 mpg US
    45.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.6 L/100 km
    30.9 mpg US
    37.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.4 L/100 km
    43.6 mpg US
    52.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    823 km
    511 mi
  • Largest trunk
    450 L
  • Best economy score
    90/100
  • Best practicality score
    81/100

Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.2 s
  • Highest torque
    320 Nm
    236 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,420 kg
    3,131 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    134 hp/t
    100 kW/t
    7.5 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    51/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
Power
192hp143kW
190hp142kW
Torque
280Nm207lb-ft
320Nm236lb-ft
Curb weight
1,460kg3,219lb
1,420kg3,131lb
Gross weight
2,050kg4,519lb
1,990kg4,387lb
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
216 km/h
134 mph
To 99% top speed
78.5s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
67.6s99% target: 214 km/h / 133 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.4s
7.2s
0-200 km/h
33.6s
Calculated
35.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.0s
Calculated
6.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.3s
Calculated
15.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
192Nm/t128lb-ft/ton
Calculated
225Nm/t151lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
823km511mi
Calculated
809km503mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,299mm169in
4,234mm167in
Width
1,822mm72in
1,819mm72in
Height
1,557mm61in
1,573mm62in
Wheelbase
2,670mm105in
2,590mm102in
Front track
1,563mm62in
1,546mm61in
Rear track
1,565mm62in
1,541mm61in
Ground clearance
165mm6in
-
Trunk volume
450L
445L
Max trunk volume
1,390L
1,290L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
51L
55L
CO2 emissions
141g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSIPowerTorque
  • Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.05,000-6,000 rpm1,350-4,600 rpm6,250 rpm
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI4,200-6,000 rpm1,500-4,180 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.0 s
6.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.4 s
7.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
33.6 s
35.7 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
216 km/h
134 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.9 s
12.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.3 s
15.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
151 km/h
94 mph
152 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
192 hp
143 kW
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0 has 2 hp more than Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI and Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0: 2 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
1,460 kg
3,219 lb
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
1,420 kg
3,131 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
225 km/h
140 mph
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
216 km/h
134 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.07.4 s
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI7.2 s

Although Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0 has more power, Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI and Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0 and Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI: 0.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
823 km
511 mi
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
809 km
503 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
192 hp
143 kW
7.4 s
225 km/h
140 mph
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
7.2 s
216 km/h
134 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,299 mm
169.3 in
Height
1,557 mm
61.3 in
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Length
4,234 mm
166.7 in
Height
1,573 mm
61.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK

Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
7.4 s
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
7.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
Power
192 hp
143 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.4 s
7.2 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
216 km/h
134 mph
Lightness
1,460 kg
3,219 lb
1,420 kg
3,131 lb
Fuel consumption
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,299 mm
169.3 in
Height
1,557 mm
61.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Length
4,234 mm
166.7 in
Height
1,573 mm
61.9 in
Range score
823 km
511 mi
809 km
503 mi
CO2 score
141 g/km
-
Trunk score
450 L
15.9 cu ft
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI
Consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.85 LC100 km11.90 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi17.46 LC100 mi19.15 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used930 L246 US gal205 UK gal1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,628 LC/year1,785 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0

  • Has 2 hp more
  • Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 14 km (9 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 5 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI

  • Has 40 Nm more
  • Is 40 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI
Cooper S 2.0
Cooper SD 2.0
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper SD 2.0
2.0 TSI
1.5 eTSI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenT-Roc II1.5 eTSI
Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniCountryman (R60)Cooper S 1.6
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI
Cooper S 2.0
S 2.0
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Cooper S 2.0
20i
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0vsBMWX2 (F39)20i
2.0 TSI
330TSI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTayron I330TSI
Cooper S 2.0
2.0 TDI
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0vsAUDIQ22.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0 vs Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster