Mini Countryman (U25)
Car comparison
Mini Countryman (U25) S 2.0vsMini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Countryman (F60)
Cooper S 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Countryman (U25) S 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Fastest top speed228 km/h142 mph
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0
- Lightest1,460 kg3,219 lb
- Best power-to-weight132 hp/t98 kW/t7.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range823 km511 mi
- Best economy score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 192hp143kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,640kg3,616lb | 1,460kg3,219lb |
| Gross weight | 2,195kg4,839lb | 2,050kg4,519lb |
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.7s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated | 78.4s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.1s Calculated | 33.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 124hp/t93kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 195Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated | 192Nm/t128lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 783km486mi Calculated | 823km511mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,444mm175in | 4,299mm169in |
| Width | 1,843mm73in | 1,822mm72in |
| Height | 1,661mm65in | 1,557mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,692mm106in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | - | 1,563mm62in |
| Rear track | - | 1,565mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 165mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 450L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,450L | 1,390L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 54L | 51L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 141g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Countryman (U25) S 2.0: Power / Torque
- Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | 5,000-6,500 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0 | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,350-4,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.7 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.1 s | 33.6 s |
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 95 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | 204 hp 152 kW |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0 | 192 hp 143 kW |
Mini Countryman (U25) S 2.0 has 12 hp more than Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0 and Mini Countryman (U25) S 2.0: 12 hp (9 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0 | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0 | 1,460 kg 3,219 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0 | 225 km/h 140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | 7.1 s |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0 | 7.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Countryman (U25) S 2.0 and Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0 | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0 and Mini Countryman (U25) S 2.0: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0 | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | 783 km 486 mi |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0 | 823 km 511 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.1 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0 | 192 hp 143 kW | 7.4 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0 |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Countryman (U25) S 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0 | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0 | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 192 hp 143 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb | 1,460 kg 3,219 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 783 km 486 mi | 823 km 511 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 141 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Countryman (U25) S 2.0 | Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.08 LC100 km | 10.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,811 LC/year | 1,628 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Countryman (U25) S 2.0
- Has 12 hp more
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0
- Is 180 kg lighter
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 40 km (25 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























