Car comparison

BMW X1 (F48) 20dvsSkoda Karoq Scout 2.0 TDI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW X1 (F48)

20d

190 hp1995 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2019
VS

Skoda Karoq Scout

2.0 TDI

190 hp1968 ccDieselAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2019-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW X1 (F48) 20d

  • Fastest top speed
    219 km/h
    136 mph
  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,615 kg
    3,560 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    118 hp/t
    88 kW/t
    8.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.8 L/100 km
    49.0 mpg US
    58.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.4 L/100 km
    43.6 mpg US
    52.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.4 L/100 km
    53.5 mpg US
    64.2 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,063 km
    660 mi
  • Largest trunk
    505 L
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    50/100
  • Best economy score
    94/100
  • Best practicality score
    84/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWX1 (F48)20dSkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI
Power
190hp142kW
190hp142kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,615kg3,560lb
1,696kg3,739lb
Gross weight
2,205kg4,861lb
2,252kg4,965lb
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
214 km/h
133 mph
To 99% top speed
78.7s99% target: 217 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
82.8s99% target: 212 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.8s
7.4s
0-200 km/h
38.2s
Calculated
43.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.4s
Calculated
7.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.7s
Calculated
15.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
118hp/t88kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
112hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
248Nm/t166lb-ft/ton
Calculated
236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,063km660mi
Calculated
962km597mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,995cc122cu in
1,968cc120cu in
Length
4,439mm175in
4,398mm173in
Width
1,821mm72in
1,841mm72in
Height
1,598mm63in
1,628mm64in
Wheelbase
2,670mm105in
2,629mm104in
Front track
1,561mm61in
1,576mm62in
Rear track
1,562mm61in
1,547mm61in
Ground clearance
183mm7in
167mm7in
Trunk volume
505L
479L
Max trunk volume
1,550L
1,810L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
51L
50L
CO2 emissions
126g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW X1 (F48) 20dSkoda Karoq Scout 2.0 TDIPowerTorque
  • BMW X1 (F48) 20d: Power / Torque
  • Skoda Karoq Scout 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMWX1 (F48)20d4,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm
SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI3,500-4,000 rpm1,900-3,300 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWX1 (F48)20dSkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.4 s
7.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.8 s
7.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
38.2 s
43.9 s
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
214 km/h
133 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
12.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.7 s
15.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
148 km/h
92 mph
146 km/h
91 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)20d
190 hp
142 kW
SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI
190 hp
142 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)20d
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)20d
1,615 kg
3,560 lb
SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI
1,696 kg
3,739 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)20d
219 km/h
136 mph
SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI
214 km/h
133 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)20d7.8 s
SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI7.4 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Karoq Scout 2.0 TDI and BMW X1 (F48) 20d: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)20d
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)20d
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI
112 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)20d
1,063 km
660 mi
SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI
962 km
597 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWX1 (F48)20d
190 hp
142 kW
7.8 s
219 km/h
136 mph
SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI
190 hp
142 kW
7.4 s
214 km/h
133 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWX1 (F48)20d
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,439 mm
174.8 in
Height
1,598 mm
62.9 in
SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
214 km/h
133 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
479 L
16.9 cu ft
Length
4,398 mm
173.1 in
Height
1,628 mm
64.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMWX1 (F48)20d
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
214 km/h
133 mph
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK

BMW X1 (F48) 20d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMWX1 (F48)20d
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
7.8 s
SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
7.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMWX1 (F48)20d
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI
112 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.9 kg/hp
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWX1 (F48)20dSkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.8 s
7.4 s
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
214 km/h
133 mph
Lightness
1,615 kg
3,560 lb
1,696 kg
3,739 lb
Fuel consumption
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,439 mm
174.8 in
Height
1,598 mm
62.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
479 L
16.9 cu ft
Length
4,398 mm
173.1 in
Height
1,628 mm
64.1 in
Range score
1,063 km
660 mi
962 km
597 mi
CO2 score
126 g/km
-
Trunk score
505 L
17.8 cu ft
479 L
16.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
112 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW X1 (F48) 20dSkoda Karoq Scout 2.0 TDI
Consumption4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km8.40 LC100 km9.10 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi13.52 LC100 mi14.65 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used720 L190 US gal158 UK gal780 L206 US gal172 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,260 LC/year1,365 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW X1 (F48) 20d

  • Is 81 kg lighter
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 101 km (63 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 26 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h

Skoda Karoq Scout 2.0 TDI

  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW X1 (F48) 20d
Skoda Karoq Scout 2.0 TDI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

BMW X1 (F48) 20d vs Skoda Karoq Scout 2.0 TDI - car comparison - FastVsFaster