BMW X1 (F48)
Car comparison
BMW X1 (F48) 20dvsSkoda Karoq Scout 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSkoda Karoq Scout
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X1 (F48) 20d
- Fastest top speed219 km/h136 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,615 kg3,560 lb
- Best power-to-weight118 hp/t88 kW/t8.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,063 km660 mi
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Skoda Karoq Scout 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX1 (F48)20d | SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,615kg3,560lb | 1,696kg3,739lb |
| Gross weight | 2,205kg4,861lb | 2,252kg4,965lb |
| Top speed | 219 km/h 136 mph | 214 km/h 133 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.7s99% target: 217 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 82.8s99% target: 212 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 38.2s Calculated | 43.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 118hp/t88kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated | 112hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 248Nm/t166lb-ft/ton Calculated | 236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,063km660mi Calculated | 962km597mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,439mm175in | 4,398mm173in |
| Width | 1,821mm72in | 1,841mm72in |
| Height | 1,598mm63in | 1,628mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,629mm104in |
| Front track | 1,561mm61in | 1,576mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,562mm61in | 1,547mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 183mm7in | 167mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 505L | 479L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,550L | 1,810L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 126g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X1 (F48) 20d: Power / Torque
- Skoda Karoq Scout 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,900-3,300 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX1 (F48)20d | SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 38.2 s | 43.9 s |
| Top speed | 219 km/h 136 mph | 214 km/h 133 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 146 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 190 hp 142 kW |
| SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb |
| SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI | 1,696 kg 3,739 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI | 214 km/h 133 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 7.8 s |
| SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI | 7.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Karoq Scout 2.0 TDI and BMW X1 (F48) 20d: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
| SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 1,063 km 660 mi |
| SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI | 962 km 597 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.8 s | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.4 s | 214 km/h 133 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X1 (F48) 20d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX1 (F48)20d | SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 219 km/h 136 mph | 214 km/h 133 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb | 1,696 kg 3,739 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,063 km 660 mi | 962 km 597 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 126 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 479 L 16.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X1 (F48) 20d | Skoda Karoq Scout 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.40 LC100 km | 9.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,260 LC/year | 1,365 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X1 (F48) 20d
- Is 81 kg lighter
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 101 km (63 mi) more estimated range
- Has 26 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
Skoda Karoq Scout 2.0 TDI
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























