Car comparison

Skoda Karoq Scout 2.0 TDIvsVolvo XC40 2.0 D4

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Karoq Scout

2.0 TDI

190 hp1968 ccDieselAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2019-2020
VS

Volvo XC40

2.0 D4

190 hp1969 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2018-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Karoq Scout 2.0 TDI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    214 km/h
    133 mph
  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,696 kg
    3,739 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    112 hp/t
    84 kW/t
    8.9 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    479 L
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best performance score
    49/100
  • Best economy score
    93/100
  • Best practicality score
    83/100

Volvo XC40 2.0 D4

  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.1 L/100 km
    46.1 mpg US
    55.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,059 km
    658 mi

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDIVolvoXC402.0 D4
Power
190hp142kW
190hp142kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,696kg3,739lb
1,728kg3,810lb
Gross weight
2,252kg4,965lb
2,250kg4,960lb
Top speed
214 km/h
133 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
To 99% top speed
82.8s99% target: 212 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
84.5s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.4s
7.9s
0-200 km/h
43.9s
Calculated
51.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.0s
Calculated
7.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
15.4s
Calculated
15.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
112hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb
Calculated
110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton
Calculated
231Nm/t155lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
962km597mi
Calculated
1,059km658mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,968cc120cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,398mm173in
4,425mm174in
Width
1,841mm72in
1,863mm73in
Height
1,628mm64in
1,652mm65in
Wheelbase
2,629mm104in
2,702mm106in
Front track
1,576mm62in
1,601mm63in
Rear track
1,547mm61in
1,626mm64in
Ground clearance
167mm7in
211mm8in
Trunk volume
479L
460L
Max trunk volume
1,810L
1,336L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
50L
54L
CO2 emissions-
133g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Karoq Scout 2.0 TDIVolvo XC40 2.0 D4PowerTorque
  • Skoda Karoq Scout 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
  • Volvo XC40 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI3,500-4,000 rpm1,900-3,300 rpm4,250 rpm
VolvoXC402.0 D44,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDIVolvoXC402.0 D4
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.0 s
7.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.4 s
7.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
43.9 s
51.3 s
Top speed
214 km/h
133 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.9 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.9 s
13.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.4 s
15.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
146 km/h
91 mph
143 km/h
89 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI
190 hp
142 kW
VolvoXC402.0 D4
190 hp
142 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
VolvoXC402.0 D4
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI
1,696 kg
3,739 lb
VolvoXC402.0 D4
1,728 kg
3,810 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI
214 km/h
133 mph
VolvoXC402.0 D4
210 km/h
130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI7.4 s
VolvoXC402.0 D47.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Karoq Scout 2.0 TDI and Volvo XC40 2.0 D4: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
VolvoXC402.0 D4
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI
112 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.9 kg/hp
VolvoXC402.0 D4
110 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI
962 km
597 mi
VolvoXC402.0 D4
1,059 km
658 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI
190 hp
142 kW
7.4 s
214 km/h
133 mph
VolvoXC402.0 D4
190 hp
142 kW
7.9 s
210 km/h
130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
214 km/h
133 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
479 L
16.9 cu ft
Length
4,398 mm
173.1 in
Height
1,628 mm
64.1 in
VolvoXC402.0 D4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
460 L
16.2 cu ft
Length
4,425 mm
174.2 in
Height
1,652 mm
65.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
214 km/h
133 mph
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
VolvoXC402.0 D4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK

Skoda Karoq Scout 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
7.4 s
VolvoXC402.0 D4
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
7.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI
112 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.9 kg/hp
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
VolvoXC402.0 D4
110 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDIVolvoXC402.0 D4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.4 s
7.9 s
Top speed
214 km/h
133 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
Lightness
1,696 kg
3,739 lb
1,728 kg
3,810 lb
Fuel consumption
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
479 L
16.9 cu ft
Length
4,398 mm
173.1 in
Height
1,628 mm
64.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
460 L
16.2 cu ft
Length
4,425 mm
174.2 in
Height
1,652 mm
65.0 in
Range score
962 km
597 mi
1,059 km
658 mi
CO2 score
-
133 g/km
Trunk score
479 L
16.9 cu ft
460 L
16.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
112 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.9 kg/hp
110 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Karoq Scout 2.0 TDIVolvo XC40 2.0 D4
Consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.10 LC100 km8.92 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi14.65 LC100 mi14.36 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used780 L206 US gal172 UK gal765 L202 US gal168 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,365 LC/year1,339 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Karoq Scout 2.0 TDI

  • Is 32 kg lighter
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 19 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Volvo XC40 2.0 D4

  • Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 97 km (60 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Karoq Scout 2.0 TDI
Volvo XC40 2.0 D4
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Skoda Karoq Scout 2.0 TDI vs Volvo XC40 2.0 D4 - car comparison - FastVsFaster