Car comparison

BMW X2 (F39) 20ivsSkoda Karoq Scout 2.0 TDI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW X2 (F39)

20i

192 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2019-2020
VS

Skoda Karoq Scout

2.0 TDI

190 hp1968 ccDieselAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2019-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Karoq Scout 2.0 TDI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.4 s
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.2 L/100 km
    45.2 mpg US
    54.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.0 L/100 km
    39.2 mpg US
    47.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.8 L/100 km
    49.0 mpg US
    58.9 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    962 km
    597 mi
  • Largest trunk
    479 L
  • Best economy score
    93/100
  • Best practicality score
    83/100

BMW X2 (F39) 20i

  • Fastest top speed
    224 km/h
    139 mph
  • Most powerful
    192 hp
    143 kW
  • Lightest
    1,540 kg
    3,395 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    125 hp/t
    93 kW/t
    8.0 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best performance score
    49/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWX2 (F39)20iSkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI
Power
192hp143kW
190hp142kW
Torque
280Nm207lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,540kg3,395lb
1,696kg3,739lb
Gross weight
2,145kg4,729lb
2,252kg4,965lb
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
214 km/h
133 mph
To 99% top speed
78.6s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
82.8s99% target: 212 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.8s
7.4s
0-200 km/h
34.8s
Calculated
43.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.4s
Calculated
7.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK
5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.6s
Calculated
15.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
112hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
182Nm/t122lb-ft/ton
Calculated
236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
910km566mi
Calculated
962km597mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,968cc120cu in
Length
4,360mm172in
4,398mm173in
Width
1,824mm72in
1,841mm72in
Height
1,526mm60in
1,628mm64in
Wheelbase
2,670mm105in
2,629mm104in
Front track
1,563mm62in
1,576mm62in
Rear track
1,562mm61in
1,547mm61in
Ground clearance
182mm7in
167mm7in
Trunk volume
470L
479L
Max trunk volume
1,355L
1,810L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
61L
50L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW X2 (F39) 20iSkoda Karoq Scout 2.0 TDIPowerTorque
  • BMW X2 (F39) 20i: Power / Torque
  • Skoda Karoq Scout 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMWX2 (F39)20i5,000-6,000 rpm1,350-4,600 rpm6,250 rpm
SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI3,500-4,000 rpm1,900-3,300 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWX2 (F39)20iSkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.4 s
7.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.8 s
7.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
34.8 s
43.9 s
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
214 km/h
133 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.3 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
12.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.6 s
15.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
149 km/h
93 mph
146 km/h
91 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)20i
192 hp
143 kW
SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI
190 hp
142 kW

BMW X2 (F39) 20i has 2 hp more than Skoda Karoq Scout 2.0 TDI.

The biggest power difference is between Skoda Karoq Scout 2.0 TDI and BMW X2 (F39) 20i: 2 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)20i
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)20i
1,540 kg
3,395 lb
SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI
1,696 kg
3,739 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)20i
224 km/h
139 mph
SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI
214 km/h
133 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)20i7.8 s
SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI7.4 s

Although BMW X2 (F39) 20i has more power, Skoda Karoq Scout 2.0 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Karoq Scout 2.0 TDI and BMW X2 (F39) 20i: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)20i
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Karoq Scout 2.0 TDI and BMW X2 (F39) 20i: 1.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)20i
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI
112 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)20i
910 km
566 mi
SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI
962 km
597 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWX2 (F39)20i
192 hp
143 kW
7.8 s
224 km/h
139 mph
SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI
190 hp
142 kW
7.4 s
214 km/h
133 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWX2 (F39)20i
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
470 L
16.6 cu ft
Length
4,360 mm
171.7 in
Height
1,526 mm
60.1 in
SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
214 km/h
133 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
479 L
16.9 cu ft
Length
4,398 mm
173.1 in
Height
1,628 mm
64.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMWX2 (F39)20i
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
214 km/h
133 mph
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK

Skoda Karoq Scout 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMWX2 (F39)20i
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
7.8 s
SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
7.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMWX2 (F39)20i
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI
112 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.9 kg/hp
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWX2 (F39)20iSkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI
Power
192 hp
143 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.8 s
7.4 s
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
214 km/h
133 mph
Lightness
1,540 kg
3,395 lb
1,696 kg
3,739 lb
Fuel consumption
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
470 L
16.6 cu ft
Length
4,360 mm
171.7 in
Height
1,526 mm
60.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
479 L
16.9 cu ft
Length
4,398 mm
173.1 in
Height
1,628 mm
64.1 in
Range score
910 km
566 mi
962 km
597 mi
Trunk score
470 L
16.6 cu ft
479 L
16.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
112 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW X2 (F39) 20iSkoda Karoq Scout 2.0 TDI
Consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.73 LC100 km9.10 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.87 LC100 mi14.65 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal780 L206 US gal172 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,759 LC/year1,365 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW X2 (F39) 20i

  • Has 2 hp more
  • Is 156 kg lighter
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

Skoda Karoq Scout 2.0 TDI

  • Has 120 Nm more
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 51 km (32 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 9 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW X2 (F39) 20i
Skoda Karoq Scout 2.0 TDI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

20i
20i
VS
BMWX2 (F39)20ivsBMWX2 (U10)20i
2.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDIvsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI
20i
20i
VS
BMWX2 (F39)20ivsBMWX1 (F48)20i
2.0 TDI
40 TDI
VS
SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
20i
20d
VS
BMWX2 (F39)20ivsBMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201420d
2.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDIvsSeatTarraco2.0 TSI
20i
20i
VS
BMWX2 (F39)20ivsBMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i
2.0 TDI
40 TFSI
VS
SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDIvsAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI
2.0 TDI
2.2 JTDM
VS
SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDIvsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
20i
30d
VS
BMWX2 (F39)20ivsBMWX7 (G07)30d
2.0 TDI
Cooper SD 2.0
VS
SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDIvsMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
2.0 TDI
2.0 D4
VS
SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDIvsVolvoXC402.0 D4
BMW X2 (F39) 20i vs Skoda Karoq Scout 2.0 TDI - car comparison - FastVsFaster