Car comparison

BMW X1 (F48) 20dvsJaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW X1 (F48)

20d

190 hp1995 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2019
VS

Jaguar E-Pace

2.0 P200

200 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2018-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW X1 (F48) 20d

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    219 km/h
    136 mph
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,615 kg
    3,560 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    118 hp/t
    88 kW/t
    8.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.8 L/100 km
    49.0 mpg US
    58.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    126 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,063 km
    660 mi
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    50/100
  • Best economy score
    94/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWX1 (F48)20dJaguarE-Pace2.0 P200
Power
190hp142kW
200hp149kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
340Nm251lb-ft
Curb weight
1,615kg3,560lb
1,757kg3,874lb
Gross weight
2,205kg4,861lb
-
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
216 km/h
134 mph
To 99% top speed
78.6s99% target: 217 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
94.6s99% target: 214 km/h / 133 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.8s
8.2s
0-200 km/h
38.1s
Calculated
47.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.4s
Calculated
7.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
15.7s
Calculated
16.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
118hp/t88kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
248Nm/t166lb-ft/ton
Calculated
194Nm/t129lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,063km660mi
Calculated
835km519mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,995cc122cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,439mm175in
4,395mm173in
Width
1,821mm72in
1,984mm78in
Height
1,598mm63in
1,649mm65in
Wheelbase
2,670mm105in
2,681mm106in
Front track
1,561mm61in
1,635mm64in
Rear track
1,562mm61in
1,634mm64in
Ground clearance
183mm7in
204mm8in
Trunk volume
505L
1,234L
Max trunk volume
1,550L
2,577L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
51L
69L
CO2 emissions
126g/km
186g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW X1 (F48) 20dJaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200PowerTorque
  • BMW X1 (F48) 20d: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMWX1 (F48)20d4,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P2005,500 rpm1,250 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWX1 (F48)20dJaguarE-Pace2.0 P200
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.4 s
7.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.8 s
8.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
38.1 s
47.1 s
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
216 km/h
134 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
10.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
13.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.7 s
16.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
148 km/h
92 mph
142 km/h
88 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)20d
190 hp
142 kW
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200
200 hp
149 kW

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200 has 10 hp more than BMW X1 (F48) 20d.

The biggest power difference is between BMW X1 (F48) 20d and Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)20d
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200
340 Nm
251 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)20d
1,615 kg
3,560 lb
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200
1,757 kg
3,874 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)20d
219 km/h
136 mph
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200
216 km/h
134 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)20d7.8 s
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P2008.2 s

Although Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200 has more power, BMW X1 (F48) 20d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X1 (F48) 20d and Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)20d
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X1 (F48) 20d and Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200: 3.4 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)20d
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200
114 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)20d
1,063 km
660 mi
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200
835 km
519 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWX1 (F48)20d
190 hp
142 kW
7.8 s
219 km/h
136 mph
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200
200 hp
149 kW
8.2 s
216 km/h
134 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWX1 (F48)20d
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,439 mm
174.8 in
Height
1,598 mm
62.9 in
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
1,234 L
43.6 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,649 mm
64.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMWX1 (F48)20d
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK

BMW X1 (F48) 20d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMWX1 (F48)20d
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
7.8 s
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
8.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMWX1 (F48)20d
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200
114 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWX1 (F48)20dJaguarE-Pace2.0 P200
Power
190 hp
142 kW
200 hp
149 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
340 Nm
251 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.8 s
8.2 s
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
216 km/h
134 mph
Lightness
1,615 kg
3,560 lb
1,757 kg
3,874 lb
Fuel consumption
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,439 mm
174.8 in
Height
1,598 mm
62.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
1,234 L
43.6 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,649 mm
64.9 in
Range score
1,063 km
660 mi
835 km
519 mi
CO2 score
126 g/km
186 g/km
Trunk score
505 L
17.8 cu ft
1,234 L
43.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
114 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW X1 (F48) 20dJaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200
Consumption4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km8.40 LC100 km14.35 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi13.52 LC100 mi23.09 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used720 L190 US gal158 UK gal1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,260 LC/year2,153 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW X1 (F48) 20d

  • Has 60 Nm more
  • Is 142 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 3.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 227 km (141 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 60 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Has 729 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW X1 (F48) 20d
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

BMW X1 (F48) 20d vs Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200 - car comparison - FastVsFaster