Car comparison

BMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10vsJaguar XK Coupe (X150) · Facelift 2009 R 5.0 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW M6 (E63)

5.0 V10

507 hp4999 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCoupe2005-2007
VS

Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) · Facelift 2009

R 5.0 V8

510 hp5000 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticSuperchargedCoupe2009-2011

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2009 R 5.0 V8

  • Most powerful
    510 hp
    380 kW
  • Highest torque
    625 Nm
    461 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    12.3 L/100 km
    19.1 mpg US
    23.0 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    18.9 L/100 km
    12.4 mpg US
    14.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    8.6 L/100 km
    27.4 mpg US
    32.8 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    574 km
    357 mi
  • Best performance score
    82/100
  • Best economy score
    74/100

BMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    265 km/h
    165 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,710 kg
    3,770 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    296 hp/t
    221 kW/t
    3.4 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    450 L
  • Best overall score
    71/100
  • Best practicality score
    53/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8
Power
507hp378kW
510hp380kW
Torque
520Nm384lb-ft
625Nm461lb-ft
Curb weight
1,710kg3,770lb
1,753kg3,865lb
Gross weight
2,200kg4,850lb
2,145kg4,729lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
57.3s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
59.2s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.6s
4.8s
0-200 km/h
15.4s
Calculated
16.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.4s
Calculated
4.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
14.8L/100 km15.9mpg US19.1mpg UK
12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
22.8L/100 km10.3mpg US12.4mpg UK
18.9L/100 km12.4mpg US14.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.7s
Calculated
12.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
296hp/t221kW/t134hp/1000 lb
Calculated
291hp/t217kW/t132hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
304Nm/t203lb-ft/ton
Calculated
357Nm/t239lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
473km294mi
Calculated
574km357mi
Calculated
Displacement
4,999cc305cu in
5,000cc305cu in
Length
4,871mm192in
4,794mm189in
Width
1,855mm73in
1,892mm74in
Height
1,372mm54in
1,322mm52in
Wheelbase
2,781mm109in
2,752mm108in
Front track
1,567mm62in
-
Rear track
1,584mm62in
-
Ground clearance-
100mm4in
Trunk volume
450L
330L
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
70L
71L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2009 R 5.0 V8PowerTorque
  • BMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2009 R 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V107,750 rpm6,100 rpm8,250 rpm
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V86,000-6,500 rpm2,500-5,500 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.4 s
4.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.6 s
4.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
15.4 s
16.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
5.6 s
5.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.3 s
8.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.7 s
10.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.7 s
12.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
184 km/h
114 mph
182 km/h
113 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10
507 hp
378 kW
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8
510 hp
380 kW

Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2009 R 5.0 V8 has 3 hp more than BMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10.

The biggest power difference is between BMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10 and Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2009 R 5.0 V8: 3 hp (2 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10
520 Nm
384 lb-ft
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8
625 Nm
461 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10
1,710 kg
3,770 lb
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8
1,753 kg
3,865 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V104.6 s
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V84.8 s

Although Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2009 R 5.0 V8 has more power, BMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10 and Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2009 R 5.0 V8: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10
14.8 L/100 km
15.9 mpg US
19.1 mpg UK
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2009 R 5.0 V8 and BMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10: 2.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10
296 hp/t
221 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8
291 hp/t
217 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10
473 km
294 mi
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8
574 km
357 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10
507 hp
378 kW
4.6 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8
510 hp
380 kW
4.8 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10
Power
507 hp
378 kW
0-100 km/h4.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,871 mm
191.8 in
Height
1,372 mm
54.0 in
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8
Power
510 hp
380 kW
0-100 km/h4.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Length
4,794 mm
188.7 in
Height
1,322 mm
52.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10
Power
507 hp
378 kW
0-100 km/h4.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
14.8 L/100 km
15.9 mpg US
19.1 mpg UK
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8
Power
510 hp
380 kW
0-100 km/h4.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK

Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2009 R 5.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10
14.8 L/100 km
15.9 mpg US
19.1 mpg UK
4.6 s
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK
4.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10
296 hp/t
221 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
14.8 L/100 km
15.9 mpg US
19.1 mpg UK
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8
291 hp/t
217 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8
Power
507 hp
378 kW
510 hp
380 kW
Torque
520 Nm
384 lb-ft
625 Nm
461 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.6 s
4.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,710 kg
3,770 lb
1,753 kg
3,865 lb
Fuel consumption
14.8 L/100 km
15.9 mpg US
19.1 mpg UK
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,871 mm
191.8 in
Height
1,372 mm
54.0 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Length
4,794 mm
188.7 in
Height
1,322 mm
52.0 in
Range score
473 km
294 mi
574 km
357 mi
Trunk score
450 L
15.9 cu ft
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
296 hp/t
221 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
291 hp/t
217 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2009 R 5.0 V8
Consumption14.8 L/100 km15.9 mpg US19.1 mpg UK12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km25.90 LC100 km21.53 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi41.68 LC100 mi34.64 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,220 L586 US gal488 UK gal1,845 L487 US gal406 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,885 LC/year3,229 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10

  • Is 43 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 120 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2009 R 5.0 V8

  • Has 3 hp more
  • Has 105 Nm more
  • Uses 2.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 101 km (63 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10
Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) R 5.0 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

5.0 V10
5.0 V10
VS
BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10vsBMWM6 Convertible (E64)5.0 V10
R 5.0 V8
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8vsJaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
5.0 V10
4.0 V8
VS
BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10vsBMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8
R 5.0 V8
R 4.2 V8
VS
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8vsJaguarXK Coupe (X150)R 4.2 V8
5.0 V10
650i
VS
BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10vsBMW6 Series (E63)650i
R 5.0 V8
R 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8vsJaguarXK Convertible (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8
5.0 V10
CSL 3.2i 24V
VS
BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10vsBMWM3 Coupe (E46)CSL 3.2i 24V
R 5.0 V8
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8vsJaguarXK Convertible (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
5.0 V10
AMG CL 55 V8
VS
BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10vsMercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 55 V8
R 5.0 V8
R 4.2 V8
VS
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8vsJaguarXK Convertible (X150)R 4.2 V8
5.0 V10
AMG CL 63 V8
VS
BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10vsMercedes-BenzCL (C216)AMG CL 63 V8
R 5.0 V8
CL 600 V12
VS
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8vsMercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010CL 600 V12
BMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10 vs Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) · Facelift 2009 R 5.0 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster