BMW M5 (E60)
Car comparison
BMW M5 (E60) 5.0 V10vsMaybach 57 (W240) 5.5 V12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMaybach 57 (W240)
5.5 V12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M5 (E60) 5.0 V10
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.7 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,780 kg3,924 lb
- Best power-to-weight285 hp/t212 kW/t3.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption14.8 L/100 km15.9 mpg US19.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption22.7 L/100 km10.4 mpg US12.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK
- Best overall score79/100
- Best performance score80/100
- Best economy score67/100
Maybach 57 (W240) 5.5 V12
- Most powerful550 hp410 kW
- Highest torque900 Nm664 lb-ft
- Best estimated range692 km430 mi
- Largest trunk605 L
- Best practicality score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM5 (E60)5.0 V10 | Maybach57 (W240)5.5 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 507hp378kW | 550hp410kW |
| Torque | 520Nm384lb-ft | 900Nm664lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,780kg3,924lb | 2,660kg5,864lb |
| Gross weight | 2,300kg5,071lb | 3,260kg7,187lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 43.1s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 58.3s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.7s | 5.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.6s Calculated | 16.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.5s Calculated | 5.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.8L/100 km15.9mpg US19.1mpg UK | 15.9L/100 km14.8mpg US17.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 22.7L/100 km10.4mpg US12.4mpg UK | 24.5L/100 km9.6mpg US11.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.6s Calculated | 13.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 285hp/t212kW/t129hp/1000 lb Calculated | 207hp/t154kW/t94hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 292Nm/t195lb-ft/ton Calculated | 338Nm/t226lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 473km294mi Calculated | 692km430mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,999cc305cu in | 5,513cc336cu in |
| Length | 4,855mm191in | 5,728mm226in |
| Width | 1,846mm73in | 1,980mm78in |
| Height | 1,469mm58in | 1,572mm62in |
| Wheelbase | 2,889mm114in | 3,390mm133in |
| Front track | 1,580mm62in | 1,675mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,566mm62in | 1,695mm67in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 605L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 110L |
| CO2 emissions | 357g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW M5 (E60) 5.0 V10: Power / Torque
- Maybach 57 (W240) 5.5 V12: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E60)5.0 V10 | 7,750 rpm | 6,100 rpm | 8,250 rpm |
| Maybach57 (W240)5.5 V12 | 5,250 rpm | 2,300-3,000 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM5 (E60)5.0 V10 | Maybach57 (W240)5.5 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.5 s | 5.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.7 s | 5.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.6 s | 16.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.7 s | 11.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.6 s | 13.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 193 km/h 120 mph | 180 km/h 112 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E60)5.0 V10 | 507 hp 378 kW |
| Maybach57 (W240)5.5 V12 | 550 hp 410 kW |
Maybach 57 (W240) 5.5 V12 has 43 hp more than BMW M5 (E60) 5.0 V10.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M5 (E60) 5.0 V10 and Maybach 57 (W240) 5.5 V12: 43 hp (32 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E60)5.0 V10 | 520 Nm 384 lb-ft |
| Maybach57 (W240)5.5 V12 | 900 Nm 664 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E60)5.0 V10 | 1,780 kg 3,924 lb |
| Maybach57 (W240)5.5 V12 | 2,660 kg 5,864 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E60)5.0 V10 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Maybach57 (W240)5.5 V12 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E60)5.0 V10 | 4.7 s |
| Maybach57 (W240)5.5 V12 | 5.2 s |
Although Maybach 57 (W240) 5.5 V12 has more power, BMW M5 (E60) 5.0 V10 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M5 (E60) 5.0 V10 and Maybach 57 (W240) 5.5 V12: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E60)5.0 V10 | 14.8 L/100 km 15.9 mpg US 19.1 mpg UK |
| Maybach57 (W240)5.5 V12 | 15.9 L/100 km 14.8 mpg US 17.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M5 (E60) 5.0 V10 and Maybach 57 (W240) 5.5 V12: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E60)5.0 V10 | 285 hp/t 212 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
| Maybach57 (W240)5.5 V12 | 207 hp/t 154 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E60)5.0 V10 | 473 km 294 mi |
| Maybach57 (W240)5.5 V12 | 692 km 430 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E60)5.0 V10 | 507 hp 378 kW | 4.7 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Maybach57 (W240)5.5 V12 | 550 hp 410 kW | 5.2 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E60)5.0 V10 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Maybach57 (W240)5.5 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E60)5.0 V10 |
| 14.8 L/100 km 15.9 mpg US 19.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| Maybach57 (W240)5.5 V12 |
| 15.9 L/100 km 14.8 mpg US 17.8 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW M5 (E60) 5.0 V10 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E60)5.0 V10 | 14.8 L/100 km 15.9 mpg US 19.1 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
| Maybach57 (W240)5.5 V12 | 15.9 L/100 km 14.8 mpg US 17.8 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E60)5.0 V10 | 285 hp/t 212 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 14.8 L/100 km 15.9 mpg US 19.1 mpg UK |
| Maybach57 (W240)5.5 V12 | 207 hp/t 154 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | 15.9 L/100 km 14.8 mpg US 17.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM5 (E60)5.0 V10 | Maybach57 (W240)5.5 V12 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 507 hp 378 kW | 550 hp 410 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 520 Nm 384 lb-ft | 900 Nm 664 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.7 s | 5.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,780 kg 3,924 lb | 2,660 kg 5,864 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.8 L/100 km 15.9 mpg US 19.1 mpg UK | 15.9 L/100 km 14.8 mpg US 17.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 473 km 294 mi | 692 km 430 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 357 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 605 L 21.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 285 hp/t 212 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 207 hp/t 154 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M5 (E60) 5.0 V10 | Maybach 57 (W240) 5.5 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.8 L/100 km15.9 mpg US19.1 mpg UK | 15.9 L/100 km14.8 mpg US17.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 25.90 LC100 km | 27.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 41.68 LC100 mi | 44.78 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,220 L586 US gal488 UK gal | 2,385 L630 US gal525 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,885 LC/year | 4,174 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M5 (E60) 5.0 V10
- Is 880 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 78 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Maybach 57 (W240) 5.5 V12
- Has 43 hp more
- Has 380 Nm more
- Has 219 km (136 mi) more estimated range
- Has 105 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























