BMW M5 (F90 LCI) · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
BMW M5 (F90 LCI) · Facelift 2020 4.4 V8vsBMW M5 (E60) 5.0 V10
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M5 (E60)
5.0 V10
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M5 (F90 LCI) Facelift 2020 4.4 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.4 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful600 hp447 kW
- Highest torque750 Nm553 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight317 hp/t236 kW/t3.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption15.6 L/100 km15.1 mpg US18.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions242 g/km
- Best estimated range642 km399 mi
- Largest trunk530 L
- Best overall score84/100
- Best performance score87/100
- Best economy score78/100
- Best practicality score77/100
BMW M5 (E60) 5.0 V10
- Lightest1,780 kg3,924 lb
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 20204.4 V8 | BMWM5 (E60)5.0 V10 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 600hp447kW | 507hp378kW |
| Torque | 750Nm553lb-ft | 520Nm384lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,895kg4,178lb | 1,780kg3,924lb |
| Gross weight | 2,440kg5,379lb | 2,300kg5,071lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 40.4s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 43.1s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.4s | 4.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.1s | 13.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.2s Calculated | 4.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK | 14.8L/100 km15.9mpg US19.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.6L/100 km15.1mpg US18.1mpg UK | 22.7L/100 km10.4mpg US12.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.3s Calculated | 12.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 317hp/t236kW/t144hp/1000 lb Calculated | 285hp/t212kW/t129hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 396Nm/t265lb-ft/ton Calculated | 292Nm/t195lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 642km399mi Calculated | 473km294mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,395cc268cu in | 4,999cc305cu in |
| Length | 4,983mm196in | 4,855mm191in |
| Width | 1,903mm75in | 1,846mm73in |
| Height | 1,473mm58in | 1,469mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,982mm117in | 2,889mm114in |
| Front track | 1,626mm64in | 1,580mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,594mm63in | 1,566mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 133mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 530L | 500L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 242g/km | 357g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW M5 (F90 LCI) Facelift 2020 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
- BMW M5 (E60) 5.0 V10: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 20204.4 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 1,800-5,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BMWM5 (E60)5.0 V10 | 7,750 rpm | 6,100 rpm | 8,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 20204.4 V8 | BMWM5 (E60)5.0 V10 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.2 s | 4.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.4 s | 4.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.1 s | 13.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.9 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.4 s | 8.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.5 s | 10.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.3 s | 12.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 201 km/h 125 mph | 193 km/h 120 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 20204.4 V8 | 600 hp 447 kW |
| BMWM5 (E60)5.0 V10 | 507 hp 378 kW |
BMW M5 (F90 LCI) Facelift 2020 4.4 V8 has 93 hp more than BMW M5 (E60) 5.0 V10.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M5 (E60) 5.0 V10 and BMW M5 (F90 LCI) Facelift 2020 4.4 V8: 93 hp (69 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 20204.4 V8 | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft |
| BMWM5 (E60)5.0 V10 | 520 Nm 384 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 20204.4 V8 | 1,895 kg 4,178 lb |
| BMWM5 (E60)5.0 V10 | 1,780 kg 3,924 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 20204.4 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWM5 (E60)5.0 V10 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 20204.4 V8 | 3.4 s |
| BMWM5 (E60)5.0 V10 | 4.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M5 (F90 LCI) Facelift 2020 4.4 V8 and BMW M5 (E60) 5.0 V10: 1.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 20204.4 V8 | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
| BMWM5 (E60)5.0 V10 | 14.8 L/100 km 15.9 mpg US 19.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M5 (F90 LCI) Facelift 2020 4.4 V8 and BMW M5 (E60) 5.0 V10: 4.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 20204.4 V8 | 317 hp/t 236 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp |
| BMWM5 (E60)5.0 V10 | 285 hp/t 212 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 20204.4 V8 | 642 km 399 mi |
| BMWM5 (E60)5.0 V10 | 473 km 294 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 20204.4 V8 | 600 hp 447 kW | 3.4 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWM5 (E60)5.0 V10 | 507 hp 378 kW | 4.7 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 20204.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM5 (E60)5.0 V10 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 20204.4 V8 |
| 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWM5 (E60)5.0 V10 |
| 14.8 L/100 km 15.9 mpg US 19.1 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW M5 (F90 LCI) Facelift 2020 4.4 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 20204.4 V8 | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | 3.4 s |
| BMWM5 (E60)5.0 V10 | 14.8 L/100 km 15.9 mpg US 19.1 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 20204.4 V8 | 317 hp/t 236 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
| BMWM5 (E60)5.0 V10 | 285 hp/t 212 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 14.8 L/100 km 15.9 mpg US 19.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 20204.4 V8 | BMWM5 (E60)5.0 V10 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 600 hp 447 kW | 507 hp 378 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft | 520 Nm 384 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.4 s | 4.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,895 kg 4,178 lb | 1,780 kg 3,924 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | 14.8 L/100 km 15.9 mpg US 19.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 642 km 399 mi | 473 km 294 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 242 g/km | 357 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 530 L 18.7 cu ft | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 317 hp/t 236 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 285 hp/t 212 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M5 (F90 LCI) Facelift 2020 4.4 V8 | BMW M5 (E60) 5.0 V10 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK | 14.8 L/100 km15.9 mpg US19.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.55 LC100 km | 25.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 29.85 LC100 mi | 41.68 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,590 L420 US gal350 UK gal | 2,220 L586 US gal488 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,783 LC/year | 3,885 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M5 (F90 LCI) Facelift 2020 4.4 V8
- Has 93 hp more
- Has 230 Nm more
- Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 4.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 32 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 169 km (105 mi) more estimated range
- Has 30 L more trunk volume
- Emits 115 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
BMW M5 (E60) 5.0 V10
- Is 115 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























