Bentley Arnage T
Car comparison
Bentley Arnage T 6.8i V8 BiturbovsMaybach 57 (W240) 5.5 V12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMaybach 57 (W240)
5.5 V12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Maybach 57 (W240) 5.5 V12
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.2 s
- Most powerful550 hp410 kW
- Best power-to-weight207 hp/t154 kW/t4.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption15.9 L/100 km14.8 mpg US17.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption24.5 L/100 km9.6 mpg US11.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption11.0 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range692 km430 mi
- Largest trunk605 L
- Best economy score64/100
Bentley Arnage T 6.8i V8 Biturbo
- Fastest top speed288 km/h179 mph
- Highest torque1,000 Nm738 lb-ft
- Lightest2,585 kg5,699 lb
- Best overall score80/100
- Best performance score81/100
- Best practicality score79/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo | Maybach57 (W240)5.5 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 507hp378kW | 550hp410kW |
| Torque | 1,000Nm738lb-ft | 900Nm664lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,585kg5,699lb | 2,660kg5,864lb |
| Gross weight | 3,065kg6,757lb | 3,260kg7,187lb |
| Top speed | 288 km/h 179 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 67.5s99% target: 285 km/h / 177 mph Calculated | 58.3s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.5s | 5.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.2s Calculated | 16.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.3s Calculated | 5.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 19.5L/100 km12.1mpg US14.5mpg UK | 15.9L/100 km14.8mpg US17.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 28.8L/100 km8.2mpg US9.8mpg UK | 24.5L/100 km9.6mpg US11.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.4s Calculated | 13.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 196hp/t146kW/t89hp/1000 lb Calculated | 207hp/t154kW/t94hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 387Nm/t259lb-ft/ton Calculated | 338Nm/t226lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 492km306mi Calculated | 692km430mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 6,761cc413cu in | 5,513cc336cu in |
| Length | 5,400mm213in | 5,728mm226in |
| Width | 1,900mm75in | 1,980mm78in |
| Height | 1,515mm60in | 1,572mm62in |
| Wheelbase | 3,116mm123in | 3,390mm133in |
| Front track | 1,602mm63in | 1,675mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,602mm63in | 1,695mm67in |
| Trunk volume | - | 605L |
| Max trunk volume | 374L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 96L | 110L |
| CO2 emissions | 465g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Arnage T 6.8i V8 Biturbo: Power / Torque
- Maybach 57 (W240) 5.5 V12: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo | 4,200 rpm | 3,200 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| Maybach57 (W240)5.5 V12 | 5,250 rpm | 2,300-3,000 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo | Maybach57 (W240)5.5 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.3 s | 5.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.5 s | 5.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.2 s | 16.5 s |
| Top speed | 288 km/h 179 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.0 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.4 s | 11.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.4 s | 13.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 181 km/h 113 mph | 180 km/h 112 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo | 507 hp 378 kW |
| Maybach57 (W240)5.5 V12 | 550 hp 410 kW |
Maybach 57 (W240) 5.5 V12 has 43 hp more than Bentley Arnage T 6.8i V8 Biturbo.
The biggest power difference is between Bentley Arnage T 6.8i V8 Biturbo and Maybach 57 (W240) 5.5 V12: 43 hp (32 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo | 1,000 Nm 738 lb-ft |
| Maybach57 (W240)5.5 V12 | 900 Nm 664 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo | 2,585 kg 5,699 lb |
| Maybach57 (W240)5.5 V12 | 2,660 kg 5,864 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo | 288 km/h 179 mph |
| Maybach57 (W240)5.5 V12 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo | 5.5 s |
| Maybach57 (W240)5.5 V12 | 5.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Maybach 57 (W240) 5.5 V12 and Bentley Arnage T 6.8i V8 Biturbo: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo | 19.5 L/100 km 12.1 mpg US 14.5 mpg UK |
| Maybach57 (W240)5.5 V12 | 15.9 L/100 km 14.8 mpg US 17.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Maybach 57 (W240) 5.5 V12 and Bentley Arnage T 6.8i V8 Biturbo: 3.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo | 196 hp/t 146 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp |
| Maybach57 (W240)5.5 V12 | 207 hp/t 154 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo | 492 km 306 mi |
| Maybach57 (W240)5.5 V12 | 692 km 430 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo | 507 hp 378 kW | 5.5 s | 288 km/h 179 mph |
| Maybach57 (W240)5.5 V12 | 550 hp 410 kW | 5.2 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Maybach57 (W240)5.5 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo |
| 19.5 L/100 km 12.1 mpg US 14.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| Maybach57 (W240)5.5 V12 |
| 15.9 L/100 km 14.8 mpg US 17.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Maybach 57 (W240) 5.5 V12 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo | 19.5 L/100 km 12.1 mpg US 14.5 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
| Maybach57 (W240)5.5 V12 | 15.9 L/100 km 14.8 mpg US 17.8 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo | 196 hp/t 146 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 19.5 L/100 km 12.1 mpg US 14.5 mpg UK |
| Maybach57 (W240)5.5 V12 | 207 hp/t 154 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | 15.9 L/100 km 14.8 mpg US 17.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo | Maybach57 (W240)5.5 V12 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 507 hp 378 kW | 550 hp 410 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 1,000 Nm 738 lb-ft | 900 Nm 664 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.5 s | 5.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 288 km/h 179 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,585 kg 5,699 lb | 2,660 kg 5,864 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 19.5 L/100 km 12.1 mpg US 14.5 mpg UK | 15.9 L/100 km 14.8 mpg US 17.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 492 km 306 mi | 692 km 430 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 465 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 374 L 13.2 cu ft | 605 L 21.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 196 hp/t 146 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 207 hp/t 154 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Arnage T 6.8i V8 Biturbo | Maybach 57 (W240) 5.5 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 19.5 L/100 km12.1 mpg US14.5 mpg UK | 15.9 L/100 km14.8 mpg US17.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 34.13 LC100 km | 27.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 54.92 LC100 mi | 44.78 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,925 L773 US gal643 UK gal | 2,385 L630 US gal525 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 5,119 LC/year | 4,174 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Arnage T 6.8i V8 Biturbo
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 75 kg lighter
- Has 23 km/h (14 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Maybach 57 (W240) 5.5 V12
- Has 43 hp more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 3.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 200 km (124 mi) more estimated range
- Has 231 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























