BMW M5 (E28)
Car comparison
BMW M5 (E28) 3.5vsMaserati Quattroporte III 4.9
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMaserati Quattroporte III
4.9
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M5 (E28) 3.5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph
- Most powerful286 hp213 kW
- Lightest1,430 kg3,153 lb
- Best power-to-weight200 hp/t149 kW/t5.0 kg/hp
- Largest trunk640 L
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score60/100
- Best practicality score80/100
Maserati Quattroporte III 4.9
- Highest torque393 Nm290 lb-ft
- Best economy score55/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM5 (E28)3.5 | MaseratiQuattroporte III4.9 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 286hp213kW | 280hp209kW |
| Torque | 340Nm251lb-ft | 393Nm290lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,430kg3,153lb | 1,900kg4,189lb |
| Gross weight | 1,900kg4,189lb | 2,325kg5,126lb |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 57.2s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 66.1s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 7.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.0s Calculated | 23.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 6.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 19.5L/100 km12.1mpg US14.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.5L/100 km14.3mpg US17.1mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.4s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 200hp/t149kW/t91hp/1000 lb Calculated | 147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 238Nm/t159lb-ft/ton Calculated | 207Nm/t138lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,453cc211cu in | 4,930cc301cu in |
| Length | 4,620mm182in | 4,980mm196in |
| Width | 1,700mm67in | 1,790mm70in |
| Height | 1,400mm55in | 1,350mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,625mm103in | 2,800mm110in |
| Front track | 1,430mm56in | 1,525mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,465mm58in | 1,525mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 640L | 600L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW M5 (E28) 3.5: Power / Torque
- Maserati Quattroporte III 4.9: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E28)3.5 | 6,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| MaseratiQuattroporte III4.9 | 5,600 rpm | 3,200 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM5 (E28)3.5 | MaseratiQuattroporte III4.9 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 6.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 7.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.0 s | 23.5 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.4 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 168 km/h 105 mph | 163 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E28)3.5 | 286 hp 213 kW |
| MaseratiQuattroporte III4.9 | 280 hp 209 kW |
BMW M5 (E28) 3.5 has 6 hp more than Maserati Quattroporte III 4.9.
The biggest power difference is between Maserati Quattroporte III 4.9 and BMW M5 (E28) 3.5: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E28)3.5 | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
| MaseratiQuattroporte III4.9 | 393 Nm 290 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E28)3.5 | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb |
| MaseratiQuattroporte III4.9 | 1,900 kg 4,189 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E28)3.5 | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| MaseratiQuattroporte III4.9 | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E28)3.5 | 6.5 s |
| MaseratiQuattroporte III4.9 | 7.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M5 (E28) 3.5 and Maserati Quattroporte III 4.9: 0.5 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E28)3.5 | 200 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
| MaseratiQuattroporte III4.9 | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E28)3.5 | 286 hp 213 kW | 6.5 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| MaseratiQuattroporte III4.9 | 280 hp 209 kW | 7.0 s | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E28)3.5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MaseratiQuattroporte III4.9 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM5 (E28)3.5 | MaseratiQuattroporte III4.9 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 286 hp 213 kW | 280 hp 209 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | 393 Nm 290 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 7.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb | 1,900 kg 4,189 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 19.5 L/100 km 12.1 mpg US 14.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 640 L 22.6 cu ft | 600 L 21.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 200 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Maserati Quattroporte III 4.9 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 19.5 L/100 km12.1 mpg US14.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 34.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 54.92 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,925 L773 US gal643 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 5,119 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M5 (E28) 3.5
- Has 6 hp more
- Is 470 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 53 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 40 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Maserati Quattroporte III 4.9
- Has 53 Nm more
Pros
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























