BMW M4 (G82)
Car comparison
BMW M4 (G82) Competition 3.0vsPolestar 4 102 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPolestar 4
102 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M4 (G82) Competition 3.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.5 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,775 kg3,913 lb
- Best power-to-weight287 hp/t214 kW/t3.5 kg/hp
- Best performance score85/100
- Best economy score80/100
Polestar 4 102 kWh
- Most powerful544 hp406 kW
- Highest torque686 Nm506 lb-ft
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best overall score76/100
- Best practicality score70/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 | Polestar4102 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 510hp380kW | 544hp406kW |
| Torque | 650Nm479lb-ft | 686Nm506lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,775kg3,913lb | 2,351kg5,183lb |
| Gross weight | 2,205kg4,861lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 46.3s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 41.3s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.5s | 3.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.0s Calculated | 21.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.3s Calculated | 3.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 11.5s Calculated | 12.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 287hp/t214kW/t130hp/1000 lb Calculated | 231hp/t173kW/t105hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 366Nm/t245lb-ft/ton Calculated | 292Nm/t195lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 584km363mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | - |
| Length | 4,794mm189in | 4,839mm191in |
| Width | 1,887mm74in | 2,139mm84in |
| Height | 1,394mm55in | 1,544mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,857mm112in | 2,999mm118in |
| Front track | 1,617mm64in | - |
| Rear track | 1,605mm63in | - |
| Ground clearance | 121mm5in | 166mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 440L | 500L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,536L |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 59L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 | Polestar4102 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.3 s | 3.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.5 s | 3.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.0 s | 21.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 1.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.9 s | 5.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.5 s | 7.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.6 s | 10.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.5 s | 12.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 196 km/h 122 mph | 174 km/h 108 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 | 510 hp 380 kW |
| Polestar4102 kWh | 544 hp 406 kW |
Polestar 4 102 kWh has 34 hp more than BMW M4 (G82) Competition 3.0.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M4 (G82) Competition 3.0 and Polestar 4 102 kWh: 34 hp (25 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
| Polestar4102 kWh | 686 Nm 506 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 | 1,775 kg 3,913 lb |
| Polestar4102 kWh | 2,351 kg 5,183 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Polestar4102 kWh | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 | 3.5 s |
| Polestar4102 kWh | 3.8 s |
Although Polestar 4 102 kWh has more power, BMW M4 (G82) Competition 3.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M4 (G82) Competition 3.0 and Polestar 4 102 kWh: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 | 287 hp/t 214 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
| Polestar4102 kWh | 231 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 | 510 hp 380 kW | 3.5 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Polestar4102 kWh | 544 hp 406 kW | 3.8 s | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Polestar4102 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 | Polestar4102 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 510 hp 380 kW | 544 hp 406 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | 686 Nm 506 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.5 s | 3.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,775 kg 3,913 lb | 2,351 kg 5,183 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 584 km 363 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 440 L 15.5 cu ft | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 287 hp/t 214 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 231 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M4 (G82) Competition 3.0 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.68 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.45 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,515 L400 US gal333 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,651 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M4 (G82) Competition 3.0
- Is 576 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 50 km/h (31 mph) higher top speed
- Has 56 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Polestar 4 102 kWh
- Has 34 hp more
- Has 36 Nm more
- Has 60 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























