BMW M3 Coupe (E92)
Car comparison
BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8vsBMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M6 (E63)
5.0 V10
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,600 kg3,527 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.9 L/100 km19.8 mpg US23.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption17.0 L/100 km13.8 mpg US16.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.0 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range529 km329 mi
- Best economy score75/100
BMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10
- Most powerful507 hp378 kW
- Highest torque520 Nm384 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight296 hp/t221 kW/t3.4 kg/hp
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best overall score71/100
- Best performance score80/100
- Best practicality score53/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 420hp313kW | 507hp378kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 520Nm384lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,600kg3,527lb | 1,710kg3,770lb |
| Gross weight | 2,080kg4,586lb | 2,200kg4,850lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 53.7s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 57.3s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.6s | 4.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.9s | 15.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4s Calculated | 4.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK | 14.8L/100 km15.9mpg US19.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK | 22.8L/100 km10.3mpg US12.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.6s Calculated | 12.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 263hp/t196kW/t119hp/1000 lb Calculated | 296hp/t221kW/t134hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 250Nm/t167lb-ft/ton Calculated | 304Nm/t203lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 529km329mi Calculated | 473km294mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,999cc244cu in | 4,999cc305cu in |
| Length | 4,615mm182in | 4,871mm192in |
| Width | 1,804mm71in | 1,855mm73in |
| Height | 1,418mm56in | 1,372mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,761mm109in | 2,781mm109in |
| Front track | 1,540mm61in | 1,567mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,539mm61in | 1,584mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 430L | 450L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
- BMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 8,300 rpm | 3,900 rpm | 8,550 rpm |
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | 7,750 rpm | 6,100 rpm | 8,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.4 s | 4.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.6 s | 4.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.9 s | 15.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.3 s | 8.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.7 s | 10.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.6 s | 12.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 186 km/h 115 mph | 184 km/h 114 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 420 hp 313 kW |
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | 507 hp 378 kW |
BMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10 has 87 hp more than BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8 and BMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10: 87 hp (65 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | 520 Nm 384 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb |
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 4.6 s |
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | 4.6 s |
Although BMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10 has more power, BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK |
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | 14.8 L/100 km 15.9 mpg US 19.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8 and BMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10: 2.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 263 hp/t 196 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | 296 hp/t 221 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 529 km 329 mi |
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | 473 km 294 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 420 hp 313 kW | 4.6 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | 507 hp 378 kW | 4.6 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 |
| 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 |
| 14.8 L/100 km 15.9 mpg US 19.1 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | 14.8 L/100 km 15.9 mpg US 19.1 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 263 hp/t 196 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK |
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | 296 hp/t 221 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 14.8 L/100 km 15.9 mpg US 19.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 420 hp 313 kW | 507 hp 378 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 520 Nm 384 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.6 s | 4.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | 14.8 L/100 km 15.9 mpg US 19.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 529 km 329 mi | 473 km 294 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 263 hp/t 196 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 296 hp/t 221 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8 | BMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.9 L/100 km19.8 mpg US23.7 mpg UK | 14.8 L/100 km15.9 mpg US19.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.83 LC100 km | 25.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.51 LC100 mi | 41.68 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,785 L472 US gal393 UK gal | 2,220 L586 US gal488 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,124 LC/year | 3,885 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8
- Is 110 kg lighter
- Uses 2.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 56 km (35 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
BMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10
- Has 87 hp more
- Has 120 Nm more
- Has 34 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 20 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























