BMW M3 Coupe (E36)
Car comparison
BMW M3 Coupe (E36) 3.0ivsChevrolet Camaro IV Z28 5.7 i V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonChevrolet Camaro IV
Z28 5.7 i V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M3 Coupe (E36) 3.0i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.0 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful286 hp213 kW
- Lightest1,460 kg3,219 lb
- Best power-to-weight196 hp/t146 kW/t5.1 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption13.0 L/100 km18.1 mpg US21.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
- Largest trunk405 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score63/100
- Best economy score82/100
- Best practicality score55/100
Chevrolet Camaro IV Z28 5.7 i V8
- Highest torque441 Nm325 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.0i | ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 286hp213kW | 285hp213kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 441Nm325lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,460kg3,219lb | 1,644kg3,624lb |
| Gross weight | 1,930kg4,255lb | 1,922kg4,237lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 254 km/h 158 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.8s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 85.8s99% target: 251 km/h / 156 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.0s | 6.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.8s Calculated | 23.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.7s Calculated | 5.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK | 19.8L/100 km11.9mpg US14.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.0s Calculated | 14.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 196hp/t146kW/t89hp/1000 lb Calculated | 173hp/t129kW/t79hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 219Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated | 268Nm/t179lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 714km444mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,990cc182cu in | 5,737cc350cu in |
| Length | 4,433mm175in | 4,907mm193in |
| Width | 1,710mm67in | 1,882mm74in |
| Height | 1,335mm53in | 1,303mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,700mm106in | 2,568mm101in |
| Front track | 1,422mm56in | 1,542mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,444mm57in | 1,539mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 110mm4in | - |
| Trunk volume | 405L | 365L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 930L |
| Doors | 2 | 3 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 59L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW M3 Coupe (E36) 3.0i: Power / Torque
- Chevrolet Camaro IV Z28 5.7 i V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.0i | 7,000 rpm | 3,600 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 | 5,000 rpm | 2,400 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.0i | ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.7 s | 5.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.0 s | 6.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.8 s | 23.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 254 km/h 158 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.9 s | 11.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.0 s | 14.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 167 km/h 104 mph | 163 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.0i | 286 hp 213 kW |
| ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 | 285 hp 213 kW |
BMW M3 Coupe (E36) 3.0i has 1 hp more than Chevrolet Camaro IV Z28 5.7 i V8.
The biggest power difference is between Chevrolet Camaro IV Z28 5.7 i V8 and BMW M3 Coupe (E36) 3.0i: 1 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.0i | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 | 441 Nm 325 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.0i | 1,460 kg 3,219 lb |
| ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 | 1,644 kg 3,624 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.0i | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 | 254 km/h 158 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.0i | 6.0 s |
| ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 | 6.0 s |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.0i | 196 hp/t 146 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp |
| ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 | 173 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.0i | 286 hp 213 kW | 6.0 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 | 285 hp 213 kW | 6.0 s | 254 km/h 158 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.0i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.0i | ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 286 hp 213 kW | 285 hp 213 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 441 Nm 325 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.0 s | 6.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 254 km/h 158 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,460 kg 3,219 lb | 1,644 kg 3,624 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 714 km 444 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 405 L 14.3 cu ft | 365 L 12.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 196 hp/t 146 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 173 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M3 Coupe (E36) 3.0i |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.63 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,389 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M3 Coupe (E36) 3.0i
- Has 1 hp more
- Is 184 kg lighter
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 23 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 40 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Chevrolet Camaro IV Z28 5.7 i V8
- Has 121 Nm more
Pros
- Highest torque
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























