BMW M3 Coupe (E36)
Car comparison
BMW M3 Coupe (E36) GT 3.0vsBMW M3 Convertible (E30) 2.3
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M3 Convertible (E30)
2.3
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M3 Coupe (E36) GT 3.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful295 hp220 kW
- Highest torque323 Nm238 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight205 hp/t153 kW/t4.9 kg/hp
- Largest trunk405 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score63/100
- Best practicality score51/100
BMW M3 Convertible (E30) 2.3
- Lightest1,360 kg2,998 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.0 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.5 L/100 km18.8 mpg US22.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range775 km482 mi
- Best economy score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM3 Coupe (E36)GT 3.0 | BMWM3 Convertible (E30)2.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 295hp220kW | 215hp160kW |
| Torque | 323Nm238lb-ft | 230Nm170lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,440kg3,175lb | 1,360kg2,998lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,720kg3,792lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 239 km/h 149 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.7s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 92.7s99% target: 237 km/h / 147 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.3s Calculated | 30.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK | 12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.9s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 205hp/t153kW/t93hp/1000 lb Calculated | 158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 224Nm/t150lb-ft/ton Calculated | 169Nm/t113lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 714km444mi Calculated | 775km482mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,990cc182cu in | 2,302cc140cu in |
| Length | 4,433mm175in | 4,345mm171in |
| Width | 1,710mm67in | 1,680mm66in |
| Height | 1,335mm53in | 1,370mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,700mm106in | 2,565mm101in |
| Front track | 1,422mm56in | 1,414mm56in |
| Rear track | 1,444mm57in | 1,435mm56in |
| Ground clearance | 110mm4in | - |
| Trunk volume | 405L | 303L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 62L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW M3 Coupe (E36) GT 3.0: Power / Torque
- BMW M3 Convertible (E30) 2.3: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)GT 3.0 | 7,000 rpm | 3,900 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E30)2.3 | 6,750 rpm | 4,600 rpm | 7,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM3 Coupe (E36)GT 3.0 | BMWM3 Convertible (E30)2.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.3 s | 30.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 239 km/h 149 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.9 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 169 km/h 105 mph | 152 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)GT 3.0 | 295 hp 220 kW |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E30)2.3 | 215 hp 160 kW |
BMW M3 Coupe (E36) GT 3.0 has 80 hp more than BMW M3 Convertible (E30) 2.3.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M3 Convertible (E30) 2.3 and BMW M3 Coupe (E36) GT 3.0: 80 hp (60 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)GT 3.0 | 323 Nm 238 lb-ft |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E30)2.3 | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)GT 3.0 | 1,440 kg 3,175 lb |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E30)2.3 | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)GT 3.0 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E30)2.3 | 239 km/h 149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)GT 3.0 | 5.9 s |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E30)2.3 | 7.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M3 Coupe (E36) GT 3.0 and BMW M3 Convertible (E30) 2.3: 1.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)GT 3.0 | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E30)2.3 | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M3 Convertible (E30) 2.3 and BMW M3 Coupe (E36) GT 3.0: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)GT 3.0 | 205 hp/t 153 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E30)2.3 | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)GT 3.0 | 714 km 444 mi |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E30)2.3 | 775 km 482 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)GT 3.0 | 295 hp 220 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E30)2.3 | 215 hp 160 kW | 7.3 s | 239 km/h 149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)GT 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM3 Convertible (E30)2.3 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)GT 3.0 |
| 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWM3 Convertible (E30)2.3 |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW M3 Coupe (E36) GT 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)GT 3.0 | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E30)2.3 | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)GT 3.0 | 205 hp/t 153 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E30)2.3 | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM3 Coupe (E36)GT 3.0 | BMWM3 Convertible (E30)2.3 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 295 hp 220 kW | 215 hp 160 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 323 Nm 238 lb-ft | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 239 km/h 149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,440 kg 3,175 lb | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 714 km 444 mi | 775 km 482 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 405 L 14.3 cu ft | 303 L 10.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 205 hp/t 153 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M3 Coupe (E36) GT 3.0 | BMW M3 Convertible (E30) 2.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.92 LC100 km | 14.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.63 LC100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,389 LC/year | 2,100 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M3 Coupe (E36) GT 3.0
- Has 80 hp more
- Has 93 Nm more
- Is 1.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 26 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
- Has 47 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 102 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
BMW M3 Convertible (E30) 2.3
- Is 80 kg lighter
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 61 km (38 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























