BMW M3 Coupe (E92)
Car comparison
BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8vsBMW M3 Coupe (E36) GT 3.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M3 Coupe (E36)
GT 3.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.8 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful420 hp313 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight266 hp/t198 kW/t3.8 kg/hp
- Largest trunk430 L
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score74/100
- Best practicality score53/100
BMW M3 Coupe (E36) GT 3.0
- Lightest1,440 kg3,175 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31.0 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.0 L/100 km18.1 mpg US21.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range714 km444 mi
- Best economy score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | BMWM3 Coupe (E36)GT 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 420hp313kW | 295hp220kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 323Nm238lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,580kg3,483lb | 1,440kg3,175lb |
| Gross weight | 2,080kg4,586lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 58.0s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 77.7s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.8s | 5.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.8s | 20.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.6s Calculated | 5.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.9L/100 km13.1mpg US15.8mpg UK | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.8s Calculated | 13.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 266hp/t198kW/t121hp/1000 lb Calculated | 205hp/t153kW/t93hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 253Nm/t169lb-ft/ton Calculated | 224Nm/t150lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 508km316mi Calculated | 714km444mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,999cc244cu in | 2,990cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,615mm182in | 4,433mm175in |
| Width | 1,804mm71in | 1,710mm67in |
| Height | 1,424mm56in | 1,335mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,761mm109in | 2,700mm106in |
| Front track | 1,540mm61in | 1,422mm56in |
| Rear track | 1,539mm61in | 1,444mm57in |
| Ground clearance | - | 110mm4in |
| Trunk volume | 430L | 405L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 65L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
- BMW M3 Coupe (E36) GT 3.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 8,300 rpm | 3,900 rpm | 8,550 rpm |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)GT 3.0 | 7,000 rpm | 3,900 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | BMWM3 Coupe (E36)GT 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.6 s | 5.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.8 s | 5.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.8 s | 20.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 9.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.8 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.8 s | 13.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 182 km/h 113 mph | 169 km/h 105 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 420 hp 313 kW |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)GT 3.0 | 295 hp 220 kW |
BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8 has 125 hp more than BMW M3 Coupe (E36) GT 3.0.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M3 Coupe (E36) GT 3.0 and BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8: 125 hp (93 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)GT 3.0 | 323 Nm 238 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)GT 3.0 | 1,440 kg 3,175 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)GT 3.0 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 4.8 s |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)GT 3.0 | 5.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8 and BMW M3 Coupe (E36) GT 3.0: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)GT 3.0 | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M3 Coupe (E36) GT 3.0 and BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8: 3.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 266 hp/t 198 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)GT 3.0 | 205 hp/t 153 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 508 km 316 mi |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)GT 3.0 | 714 km 444 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 420 hp 313 kW | 4.8 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)GT 3.0 | 295 hp 220 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)GT 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 |
| 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)GT 3.0 |
| 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | 4.8 s |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)GT 3.0 | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 266 hp/t 198 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)GT 3.0 | 205 hp/t 153 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | BMWM3 Coupe (E36)GT 3.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 420 hp 313 kW | 295 hp 220 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 323 Nm 238 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.8 s | 5.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb | 1,440 kg 3,175 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 508 km 316 mi | 714 km 444 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | 405 L 14.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 266 hp/t 198 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 205 hp/t 153 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8 | BMW M3 Coupe (E36) GT 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK | 9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.70 LC100 km | 15.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.92 LC100 mi | 25.63 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal | 1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,255 LC/year | 2,389 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8
- Has 125 hp more
- Has 77 Nm more
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 61 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 25 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
BMW M3 Coupe (E36) GT 3.0
- Is 140 kg lighter
- Uses 3.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 206 km (128 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























