BMW M2 coupe (F87)
Car comparison
BMW M2 coupe (F87) Competition 3.0vsQiantu K50 78.84 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonQiantu K50
78.84 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M2 coupe (F87) Competition 3.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.4 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,550 kg3,417 lb
- Best power-to-weight265 hp/t197 kW/t3.8 kg/hp
- Largest trunk390 L
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score77/100
- Best economy score80/100
- Best practicality score51/100
Qiantu K50 78.84 kWh
- Most powerful430 hp321 kW
- Highest torque680 Nm502 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | QiantuK5078.84 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 410hp306kW | 430hp321kW |
| Torque | 550Nm406lb-ft | 680Nm502lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,550kg3,417lb | 1,960kg4,321lb |
| Gross weight | 2,010kg4,431lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 60.9s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 46.7s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.4s | 4.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.5s Calculated | 24.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.2s Calculated | 4.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 12.5s Calculated | 13.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 265hp/t197kW/t120hp/1000 lb Calculated | 219hp/t164kW/t100hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 355Nm/t237lb-ft/ton Calculated | 347Nm/t232lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 520km323mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,979cc182cu in | - |
| Length | 4,461mm176in | 4,634mm182in |
| Width | 1,854mm73in | 2,069mm81in |
| Height | 1,410mm56in | 1,253mm49in |
| Wheelbase | 2,693mm106in | 2,650mm104in |
| Front track | 1,579mm62in | 1,798mm71in |
| Rear track | 1,601mm63in | 1,791mm71in |
| Ground clearance | 118mm5in | 103mm4in |
| Trunk volume | 390L | 65L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 52L | - |
| CO2 emissions | 228g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | QiantuK5078.84 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.2 s | 4.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.4 s | 4.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.5 s | 24.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.2 s | 8.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.5 s | 10.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.5 s | 13.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 183 km/h 114 mph | 168 km/h 105 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | 410 hp 306 kW |
| QiantuK5078.84 kWh | 430 hp 321 kW |
Qiantu K50 78.84 kWh has 20 hp more than BMW M2 coupe (F87) Competition 3.0.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M2 coupe (F87) Competition 3.0 and Qiantu K50 78.84 kWh: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
| QiantuK5078.84 kWh | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | 1,550 kg 3,417 lb |
| QiantuK5078.84 kWh | 1,960 kg 4,321 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| QiantuK5078.84 kWh | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | 4.4 s |
| QiantuK5078.84 kWh | 4.6 s |
Although Qiantu K50 78.84 kWh has more power, BMW M2 coupe (F87) Competition 3.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M2 coupe (F87) Competition 3.0 and Qiantu K50 78.84 kWh: 0.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | 265 hp/t 197 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
| QiantuK5078.84 kWh | 219 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | 410 hp 306 kW | 4.4 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| QiantuK5078.84 kWh | 430 hp 321 kW | 4.6 s | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| QiantuK5078.84 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | QiantuK5078.84 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 410 hp 306 kW | 430 hp 321 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.4 s | 4.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,550 kg 3,417 lb | 1,960 kg 4,321 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 520 km 323 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 228 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 390 L 13.8 cu ft | 65 L 2.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 265 hp/t 197 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 219 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M2 coupe (F87) Competition 3.0 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 10 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.16 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,500 L396 US gal330 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,625 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M2 coupe (F87) Competition 3.0
- Is 410 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 50 km/h (31 mph) higher top speed
- Has 45 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 325 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Qiantu K50 78.84 kWh
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 130 Nm more
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























