BMW M4 (G82)
Car comparison
BMW M4 (G82) 3.0vsBMW M2 coupe (F87) Competition 3.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M2 coupe (F87)
Competition 3.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M4 (G82) 3.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.2 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful480 hp358 kW
- Highest torque550 Nm406 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight282 hp/t211 kW/t3.5 kg/hp
- Best estimated range546 km339 mi
- Largest trunk440 L
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score81/100
- Best practicality score53/100
BMW M2 coupe (F87) Competition 3.0
- Lightest1,550 kg3,417 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.0 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK
- Best economy score80/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 480hp358kW | 410hp306kW |
| Torque | 550Nm406lb-ft | 550Nm406lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,700kg3,748lb | 1,550kg3,417lb |
| Gross weight | 2,155kg4,751lb | 2,010kg4,431lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 55.5s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 60.4s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.2s | 4.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.4s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.0s Calculated | 4.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16L/100 km14.7mpg US17.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 12.3s Calculated | 12.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 282hp/t211kW/t128hp/1000 lb Calculated | 265hp/t197kW/t120hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 324Nm/t216lb-ft/ton Calculated | 355Nm/t237lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 546km339mi Calculated | 520km323mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | 2,979cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,794mm189in | 4,461mm176in |
| Width | 1,887mm74in | 1,854mm73in |
| Height | 1,393mm55in | 1,410mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,857mm112in | 2,693mm106in |
| Front track | 1,617mm64in | 1,579mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,605mm63in | 1,601mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 120mm5in | 118mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 440L | 390L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 59L | 52L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 228g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW M4 (G82) 3.0: Power / Torque
- BMW M2 coupe (F87) Competition 3.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | 6,250 rpm | 2,650-6,130 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | 5,250-7,000 rpm | 2,350-5,200 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.0 s | 4.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.2 s | 4.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.4 s | 15.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 5.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.0 s | 8.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.3 s | 10.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.3 s | 12.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 187 km/h 116 mph | 183 km/h 114 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | 480 hp 358 kW |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | 410 hp 306 kW |
BMW M4 (G82) 3.0 has 70 hp more than BMW M2 coupe (F87) Competition 3.0.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M2 coupe (F87) Competition 3.0 and BMW M4 (G82) 3.0: 70 hp (52 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | 1,700 kg 3,748 lb |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | 1,550 kg 3,417 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | 4.2 s |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | 4.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M4 (G82) 3.0 and BMW M2 coupe (F87) Competition 3.0: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M2 coupe (F87) Competition 3.0 and BMW M4 (G82) 3.0: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | 282 hp/t 211 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | 265 hp/t 197 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | 546 km 339 mi |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | 520 km 323 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | 480 hp 358 kW | 4.2 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | 410 hp 306 kW | 4.4 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 |
| 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 |
| 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW M4 (G82) 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | 4.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | 282 hp/t 211 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | 265 hp/t 197 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 480 hp 358 kW | 410 hp 306 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.2 s | 4.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,700 kg 3,748 lb | 1,550 kg 3,417 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 546 km 339 mi | 520 km 323 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 228 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 440 L 15.5 cu ft | 390 L 13.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 282 hp/t 211 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 265 hp/t 197 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M4 (G82) 3.0 | BMW M2 coupe (F87) Competition 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK | 10 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.90 LC100 km | 17.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.42 LC100 mi | 28.16 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,620 L428 US gal356 UK gal | 1,500 L396 US gal330 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,835 LC/year | 2,625 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M4 (G82) 3.0
- Has 70 hp more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 26 km (16 mi) more estimated range
- Has 50 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
BMW M2 coupe (F87) Competition 3.0
- Is 150 kg lighter
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























