Porsche 911 Coupe (F)
Car comparison
Porsche 911 Coupe (F) 2.3 SvsBMW E9 3.0CS
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW E9
3.0CS
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche 911 Coupe (F) 2.3 S
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.0 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Lightest1,075 kg2,370 lb
- Best power-to-weight177 hp/t132 kW/t5.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK
- Best overall score51/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score79/100
BMW E9 3.0CS
- Highest torque260 Nm192 lb-ft
- Best estimated range643 km399 mi
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best practicality score53/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Porsche911 Coupe (F)2.3 S | BMWE93.0CS |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 209Nm154lb-ft | 260Nm192lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,075kg2,370lb | 1,400kg3,086lb |
| Gross weight | 1,400kg3,086lb | 1,790kg3,946lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 213 km/h 132 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.4s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 95.4s99% target: 211 km/h / 131 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.0s | 8.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.9s Calculated | 51.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7s Calculated | 7.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.0s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 177hp/t132kW/t80hp/1000 lb Calculated | 129hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 194Nm/t130lb-ft/ton Calculated | 186Nm/t124lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 608km378mi Calculated | 643km399mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,341cc143cu in | 2,985cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,147mm163in | 4,660mm183in |
| Width | 1,610mm63in | 1,670mm66in |
| Height | 1,320mm52in | 1,370mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,271mm89in | 2,625mm103in |
| Front track | 1,372mm54in | 1,446mm57in |
| Rear track | 1,354mm53in | 1,402mm55in |
| Ground clearance | 150mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | - | 450L |
| Max trunk volume | 200L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 72L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche 911 Coupe (F) 2.3 S: Power / Torque
- BMW E9 3.0CS: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 Coupe (F)2.3 S | 6,500 rpm | 5,200 rpm | 7,300 rpm |
| BMWE93.0CS | 6,000 rpm | 3,700 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Porsche911 Coupe (F)2.3 S | BMWE93.0CS |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.7 s | 7.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.0 s | 8.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.9 s | 51.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | 213 km/h 132 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.0 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 98 mph | 141 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Coupe (F)2.3 S | 190 hp 142 kW |
| BMWE93.0CS | 180 hp 134 kW |
Porsche 911 Coupe (F) 2.3 S has 10 hp more than BMW E9 3.0CS.
The biggest power difference is between BMW E9 3.0CS and Porsche 911 Coupe (F) 2.3 S: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Coupe (F)2.3 S | 209 Nm 154 lb-ft |
| BMWE93.0CS | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Coupe (F)2.3 S | 1,075 kg 2,370 lb |
| BMWE93.0CS | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Coupe (F)2.3 S | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| BMWE93.0CS | 213 km/h 132 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Coupe (F)2.3 S | 7.0 s |
| BMWE93.0CS | 8.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche 911 Coupe (F) 2.3 S and BMW E9 3.0CS: 1.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Coupe (F)2.3 S | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
| BMWE93.0CS | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche 911 Coupe (F) 2.3 S and BMW E9 3.0CS: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Coupe (F)2.3 S | 177 hp/t 132 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp |
| BMWE93.0CS | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Coupe (F)2.3 S | 608 km 378 mi |
| BMWE93.0CS | 643 km 399 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 Coupe (F)2.3 S | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.0 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| BMWE93.0CS | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.2 s | 213 km/h 132 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 Coupe (F)2.3 S |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWE93.0CS |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 Coupe (F)2.3 S |
| 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWE93.0CS |
| 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche 911 Coupe (F) 2.3 S is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 Coupe (F)2.3 S | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
| BMWE93.0CS | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 Coupe (F)2.3 S | 177 hp/t 132 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
| BMWE93.0CS | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Porsche911 Coupe (F)2.3 S | BMWE93.0CS | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 209 Nm 154 lb-ft | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.0 s | 8.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 213 km/h 132 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,075 kg 2,370 lb | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 608 km 378 mi | 643 km 399 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 200 L 7.1 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 177 hp/t 132 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche 911 Coupe (F) 2.3 S | BMW E9 3.0CS |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK | 11.2 L/100 km21 mpg US25.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.85 LC100 km | 19.60 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.73 LC100 mi | 31.54 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,530 L404 US gal337 UK gal | 1,680 L444 US gal370 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,678 LC/year | 2,940 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche 911 Coupe (F) 2.3 S
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 325 kg lighter
- Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 27 km/h (17 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 48 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
BMW E9 3.0CS
- Has 51 Nm more
- Has 35 km (22 mi) more estimated range
- Has 250 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























