BMW 6 Series (E24)
Car comparison
BMW 6 Series (E24) 633CSivsBMW E9 3.0CS
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW E9
3.0CS
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 6 Series (E24) 633CSi
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.9 s
- Fastest top speed215 km/h134 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque284 Nm209 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight136 hp/t101 kW/t7.4 kg/hp
- Best overall score48/100
- Best performance score46/100
BMW E9 3.0CS
- Lightest1,400 kg3,086 lb
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best economy score77/100
- Best practicality score53/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW6 Series (E24)633CSi | BMWE93.0CS |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 284Nm209lb-ft | 260Nm192lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,470kg3,241lb | 1,400kg3,086lb |
| Gross weight | 1,830kg4,034lb | 1,790kg3,946lb |
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 213 km/h 132 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 94.4s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated | 95.4s99% target: 211 km/h / 131 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.9s | 8.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 47.8s Calculated | 51.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 136hp/t101kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated | 129hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 193Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated | 186Nm/t124lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 643km399mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,210cc196cu in | 2,985cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,755mm187in | 4,660mm183in |
| Width | 1,725mm68in | 1,670mm66in |
| Height | 1,365mm54in | 1,370mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,626mm103in | 2,625mm103in |
| Front track | 1,422mm56in | 1,446mm57in |
| Rear track | 1,487mm59in | 1,402mm55in |
| Trunk volume | 415L | 450L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 72L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 6 Series (E24) 633CSi: Power / Torque
- BMW E9 3.0CS: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW6 Series (E24)633CSi | 5,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| BMWE93.0CS | 6,000 rpm | 3,700 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW6 Series (E24)633CSi | BMWE93.0CS |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.9 s | 8.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 47.8 s | 51.5 s |
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 213 km/h 132 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 143 km/h 89 mph | 141 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series (E24)633CSi | 200 hp 149 kW |
| BMWE93.0CS | 180 hp 134 kW |
BMW 6 Series (E24) 633CSi has 20 hp more than BMW E9 3.0CS.
The biggest power difference is between BMW E9 3.0CS and BMW 6 Series (E24) 633CSi: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series (E24)633CSi | 284 Nm 209 lb-ft |
| BMWE93.0CS | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series (E24)633CSi | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb |
| BMWE93.0CS | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series (E24)633CSi | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| BMWE93.0CS | 213 km/h 132 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series (E24)633CSi | 7.9 s |
| BMWE93.0CS | 8.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 6 Series (E24) 633CSi and BMW E9 3.0CS: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series (E24)633CSi | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
| BMWE93.0CS | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW6 Series (E24)633CSi | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.9 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| BMWE93.0CS | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.2 s | 213 km/h 132 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW6 Series (E24)633CSi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWE93.0CS |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW6 Series (E24)633CSi | BMWE93.0CS | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 284 Nm 209 lb-ft | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.9 s | 8.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 213 km/h 132 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 643 km 399 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 415 L 14.7 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW E9 3.0CS |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.2 L/100 km21 mpg US25.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.60 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.54 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,680 L444 US gal370 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,940 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 6 Series (E24) 633CSi
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 24 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
BMW E9 3.0CS
- Is 70 kg lighter
- Has 35 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























